Third-Gen Mercury Cougar: The History, Features, & Options
For 1974, Cougar Mercury decided to drop the 3rd generation Cougar on the Torino/Montego platform, which was larger than its previous version. The move was meant to lean more on luxury than performance and the convertible model was to be dropped.
All of this was taking place with the 70’s Oil Crisis as the back drop. The question is: Would these decisions help raise the Cougar’s sale numbers? We will answer this question in the video below.
For more Ford related content subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/c/TonysFordsa...
The TTAC Creators Series tells stories and amplifies creators from all corners of the car world, including culture, dealerships, collections, modified builds and more.
A transcript, created by AI and edited by a staffer, is below.
[Image: Tony's Fords and Mustangs]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter
Transcript:
Mercury faced an issue in the early 1970s. Ford had the Mustang II in development, a downsized version of the Mustang. This created a problem for Mercury because the Cougar had always been based on the Mustang as an upscale variant. With the Mustang shrinking, Mercury didn’t have room in its lineup for another compact. They already had the imported Capri and the Bobcat.
For 1974, Mercury shifted the Cougar to the Montego/Torino platform, making it larger and leaning into its luxury character. But was this the right move? Would dropping the convertible hurt sales? And how would the oil crisis of the early 1970s play into it? Let’s take a closer look at the third-generation Cougar and try to answer those questions.
In September 1973, Mercury introduced the third-generation Cougar XR7 as a 1974 model. It gained two inches in wheelbase and 15 inches in overall length. This was the first Cougar to use body-on-frame construction. It shared much of its design with the Mercury Montego and Ford Torino but had a unique front fascia. The car featured a large waterfall grille flanked by quad headlights set in chrome bezels with black accents, along with wraparound turn signals. A 5-mph impact bumper with guards and a prowling cat hood ornament completed the look.
All Cougars had lower body side moldings that blended into the wheel lip guards, bright trim running along the fenders, a vinyl landau roof, and opera windows. At the rear, what looked like a full-width taillight setup was actually two wraparound housings with a reflective panel in the center that concealed the fuel cap. Vertical chrome bezels over the taillamps nodded to the first-generation Cougar. A 5-mph rear bumper with guards was standard.
Four engines were available. The base was a 165-horsepower 351 cubic-inch V8. Options included a 255-horsepower 351 Cobra Jet V8, a 170-horsepower 400 cubic-inch V8, and a 245-horsepower 460 cubic-inch V8. All were paired with a three-speed automatic.
Standard equipment included power steering, front disc brakes, steel-belted tires, bucket seats with a console, performance instrumentation, 25-ounce carpeting, and side marker lights. Options ranged from bench seating, leather upholstery, full vinyl roof, dual racing mirrors, automatic climate control, power windows and locks, tilt wheel, cruise control, illuminated visor mirrors, Traction-Lok rear axle, leather-wrapped steering wheel, AM/FM stereo or eight-track, and various wheel and tire packages.
The press responded positively, often comparing the Cougar to the Chevrolet Monte Carlo and Pontiac Grand Prix. Buyers agreed, with Mercury delivering 91,670 Cougars in 1974—an increase of about 30,000 over the previous year.
For 1975, engine options changed. The 351 Cleveland and 351 Cobra Jet were dropped, replaced by the 148-horsepower 351M. Styling updates included a revised front bumper with two oval air inlets, and a power moonroof was added to the options list. Sales dipped slightly to 62,987 units.
In 1976, changes were minor. A full-width bench seat became standard, with split-bench and bucket seats optional. Sales rebounded to 83,765 units.
Looking back, the third-generation Cougar was an important transition. Mercury needed to distance the Cougar from the Mustang, and moving it closer to the Thunderbird in size and positioning made sense. The Capri and Bobcat already filled the compact roles, so there wasn’t room for a smaller Cougar. The success of the fourth-generation Cougar further proves this was the right move.
The standout of this generation is the 1974 model equipped with the 351 Cobra Jet, although fewer than 3,000 were built, making them rare today.
If you enjoyed this breakdown, consider subscribing to the channel for more content like this. Thanks for watching, and until next time.
Tony has been a member of the car culture since the late 1970s, acquiring his first car at the age of 13 in a straight-up swap for a Schwinn 10-speed bicycle. He has personally owned well over 500 cars and trucks since that first car. He was employed as a jet engine Mechanic by the US Air Force for over 10 years and served in theater during Desert Storm. He has always wrenched on his own vehicles. In the Fall of 2021 he launched his own YouTube channel that focuses on Ford Motor Company products, both old and new, however other manufacturers product will appear from time to time. New content and videos are posted every Saturday Morning at 11 AM EST
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
The main reason for this generation Cougar's comparative sales success, and the best thing the car had going for it, were the ads featuring Farrah Fawcett.
Nice Torino.