Report: GM Allegedly Pumping The Brakes On Full-Size EVs

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

General Motors is reportedly suspending development of its next-generation electric vehicles, specifically the full-size trucks. This comes after nearly twelve months of production stalls at the automaker’s dedicated electrified truck plant, supporting claims that GM would want to move away from EVs. However, the automaker suggested that things aren’t that cut and dried.


News that the company was indefinitely delaying development on models like the GMC Hummer EV and Chevrolet Silverado EV stems from Automotive News. The outlet cited numerous insider sources who claimed that suppliers had been told the program was being postponed. This would presumably impact updated versions of the fully electric GMC Hummer, GMC Sierra, Cadillac Escalade IQ, and Chevy Silverado.


But GM has since moved to clarify that nothing has been cancelled or indefinitely delayed — at least not officially. The automaker stated that the company remains committed to all-electric vehicles as part of its end game strategy.

While we don’t necessarily love some of the “advanced technologies” General Motors has been running with of late, the company has been fairly upfront about what it’s been doing. It was one of the first automakers to publicly confirm its own profit motivations for introducing in-car marketplaces and connectivity features. It’s also one of the few manufacturers who offer a diverse array of EVs, including entry level models (e.g. Chevrolet Bolt).


That said, it’s hard to imagine that leadership wouldn’t have at least considered revisiting plans for some electric vehicles. As previously mentioned, Factory Zero has been idled repeatedly due to lackluster demand on the automaker’s largest EVs. Most of those models are secluded to be refreshed for 2028. But that effort may be wasted if there aren’t customers interested in purchasing them.


Automotive News suggested that any updated versions of GM’s full-size electrics probably wouldn’t manifest until 2030. This would place those models a couple of years behind new gasoline variants, instead of the original timeline of releasing the EVs six-to-twelve months later. Some were also supposed to receive plug-in hybrid versions (e.g. Chevy Silverado), which are assumed to be sticking with their original development schedules.


Considering how much downtime Factory Zero has experienced over the last twelve months, it seems reasonable to assume that the involved models may not have much of a future. However, automakers seem oddly devoted to fielding expensive electric models. Perhaps the company thinks that Trump era deregulation efforts will be replaced by more stringent emissions targets by the next election cycle.

The industry also sees electrification as a potential cash cow as they collectively pivot to software-defined vehicles. While combustion models are also becoming “software defined,” they are likewise seeing more electrification and digitization so that manufacturers can take full advantage of the scheme. The more analog a vehicle happens to be, the easier it is for customers to get around manufacturer gatekeeping — which includes things like affixing features to subscriptions, extensive data harvesting, and preventing anyone but the dealership from conducting maintenance or repairs.


Despite electrification often being promoted as a way to support environmentalism, the truth of the matter is that these 9,000-pound EVs coming from GM are extremely rough on roads, are quite expensive, and still consume a staggering amount of energy. They’re rather extravagant vehicles and, without purchasing subsidies from the government, we’ve seen their volumes decline in the United States.


Small and midsize electrics tend to see significantly higher take rates, often serving as a household’s main commuter vehicle or secondary runabout. But Tesla models still see anywhere between 100,000 and 300,000 more units sold annually than the nearest equivalent from Hyundai, Ford, or General Motors.


Only the full-size Cybertruck breaks from that trend, with just 29,000 examples estimated to have been sold in the United States through 2025. But it still managed to beat the Chevrolet Silverado EV, which moved 27,307 units in the same timeframe and serves as GM’s best selling full-size electric model. Meanwhile, the Cadillac Escalade IQ saw 8,115 deliveries in the U.S. during 2025 whereas the Hummer EV (both SUV and pickup) enjoyed an estimated 15,000 sales.

[Images: General Motors]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • Leonard Ostrander Leonard Ostrander on Apr 30, 2026

    Exactly.

  • Ric170339614 Ric170339614 on May 10, 2026

    I have bought or leased 21 Cadillacs since 1980 and currently own a 2023 CT5 and a 2024 XT6. When shopping for my XT6 I considered a Lyriq. I drove it and was very impressed but decided on the XT6, Premium Luxury, Platinum Edition. primarily because I wanted 3 row seating with Captain's chairs in the 2nd row. Recently Cadillac introduced the Vistiq 3 row EV. A top-of-the-line Vistiq, equivalent to my XT6 carries an MSRP of roughly $98,000, which is approximately $24,000 more than the MSRP on my XT6. I could buy a lot of 87 octane gasoline with that $24,000. In fact, it would take me 14-16 years to spend $24,000 on gas, at current prices. Based on my simple calculations, I don't think EVs are a good value, especially when you consider that I didn't factor in the cost of Charging the EV.

  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
  • Pwrwrench IIRC the most efficient version of the CRX was not sold in California, due to the "tune" of the 50+ mpg engine not meeting the emissions standards. The ones sold in California were rated in the upper 40s.Also, nearly all of these that I saw in SoCal were red, except for a few white ones.
Next