Lincoln Rumored To Build Bronco-Based G-Wagon Rival
Ford is allegedly working on something for the Lincoln brand that will rival the Mercedes-Benz G-Class and other high-zoot SUVs with legitimate off-road chops. Rumored to launch right around 2030, the model is supposed to ride on the same body-on-frame platform leveraged by the Bronco.
News comes by way of Autoweek, which cited unnamed internal sources claiming that Blue Oval already has the model in development. The company is targeting something for the 2029 or 2030 model year, suggesting that the process is still in the early stages.
The T6.2 architecture that underpins the Bronco of today is likewise used by the current Volkswagen Amarok, Ford Ranger, and Ford Everest — the latter of which is unavailable in North America. However, the proposed timeline doesn’t necessarily mean that’ll be the platform this new Lincoln adopts.
From Autoweek:
Imagine a Lincoln-style grille on a Bronco likely with softer sheetmetal edges — say, updated Navigator styling on the Bronco’s 116.1-inch wheelbase. The Ford Bronco has an overall length of 189.5 inches, so it’s closest to the Lincoln Nautilus in size, at 193.2 inches overall on a 114.2-inch wheelbase.
A next-generation Ford Bronco is expected in the 2031 model year, so it’s possible the earlier Lincoln version will share more parts and components with the new model than with the current model, which launched in the 2021 model year. There is more flexibility in tweaking and updating, and what constitutes “all-new” in body-on-frame platforms than in unibody platforms.
The Lincoln Bronco’s launch in three to four years also could affect the future of the unibody Nautilus. Ford already has cancelled the Lincoln Corsair compact unibody sport/utility and the Escape it is based on, after having produced a sufficient number of each to finish up as 2026 models. Their Louisville, Kentucky, assembly plant is being converted to production of Ford’s next-generation electric vehicles, with its first new EV model a pickup truck tipped to be roughly Maverick-size that launches in 2027. The Bronco Sport carries on as Ford’s entry in the popular compact SUV segment, competing with the Toyota RAV4 and the like.
With Ford stressing a need to push EVs downmarket by focusing on more-affordable models, Autoweek believes that any new electrics wearing a Lincoln badge are unlikely. That seems plausible. Many automakers have looked at their sales figures and decided that the market for high-end EVs has reached its limit.
About a third of Lincoln dealerships also opted out of Ford’s electric vehicle certification program at a time where the number of dealerships was also shrinking. We’ve seen this phenomenon across numerous luxury brands in recent years.
The trend has been for these companies to increase pricing as they attempt to drive vehicles further upmarket. Selling fewer cars is fine when you’re able to affix exorbitant MSRPs and juicy subscription plans. But that’s something we’ve also been seeing from mainstream brands, leaving luxury nameplates to lean heavily upon technology features to set themselves apart. But additional screens and advanced driving assistance packages have lost their novelty, with many North American drivers now snubbing them.
Globally, the issue is even worse. A lot of the changes luxury brands have made in recent years was to better cater to the massive Chinese market. Due to the fact that vehicle ownership is a relatively new concept in China, buyers have unique tastes and have gravitated toward massive screens, AI-powered vehicle operating systems, spacious interiors, and electrified powertrains.
However, domestic brands have proven capable of implementing those features for significantly less money — making foreign brands a tougher sell.
This has left Western brands with a gaggle of vehicles with luxury features aimed squarely at the Chinese that they desperately need us to purchase. But North American buyers are starting to identify touch screens as a cost-cutting measure and have begun to lose their appetite for automobiles with six-figure MSRPs.
One wonders how Lincoln’s forthcoming Bronco-based SUV will cope with the above. Vehicles boasting off-road capabilities do seem better at roping in customers willing to spend more, even if the owner never takes it off the pavement. Toyota has had great success with its pricy TRD models and Ford’s own Bronco exists in a similar space. Perhaps a luxed-out Bronco is exactly what Lincoln needs in its lineup.
Ford’s luxury division could market it as a rugged and outdoorsy premium SUV to help rationalize its price. But it would still need to undercut the Mercedes-Benz G-Wagon’s $150,000 starting MSRP to have a real chance. Meanwhile, Land Rover offers several models in a similar size range that all start between $65,000 and $116,000.
Obviously those prices will be subject to change before the Lincoln in question is launched and we don’t know where exactly the automaker sees the model fitting into the bigger picture. Considering that Ford will basically let you double the price of the current Bronco as you climb the trim ladder, Lincoln may attempt something similar.
We’d recommend waiting on confirmation from Ford before making even causal assumptions about the SUV. Development programs are cancelled all the time. Plenty of other automakers are likewise targeting rivals for the Mercedes G-Class (e.g. Audi) and there are growing concerns about oversaturation. Keep in mind that only about 9,500 G-Wagons are sold inside the United States during a particularly good year. While sales have grown steadily to achieve that volume, sales declined after cresting 10,988 units in 2024. Lincoln could be diving into a luxury segment where several brands are fighting over very small pieces of pie.
We should have a better picture of the segment, and what automakers like Ford plan on doing with it, in a couple of years.
[Images: Ford Motor Co; Mercedes-Benz]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
- Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Comments
Join the conversation
It's true that not all luxury SUVs and trucks have been successful, but a fair number of them have been (Escalade, Navigator). It shouldn't cost too much to develop a fancier Lincoln version of the Bronco for posers and people with more money than sense. Throw it on the wall and see if it sticks.
Lincoln customers are some of the most successful people on the planet.