2025 Nissan Kicks SR AWD Review -- Second Time Better Than The First

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

2025 Nissan Kicks SR AWD Fast Facts

Powertrain

2.0-liter four-cylinder (141 horsepower @ 6,000 RPM, 140lb-ft @ 4,000 RPM)

Transmission/Drive Wheels

Continously-variable automatic, all-wheel drive

Fuel Economy, MPG

27 city / 34 highway / 30 combined (EPA Rating)

Fuel Economy, L/100km

8.4 city / 6.9 highway / 7.7 combined (NRCan Rating)

Base Price

$27,680 (U.S.) / $37,691 (Canada)

As-Tested Price

$32,485 (U.S.) / $38,566 (Canada)

Disclaimer: Prices include $1,390 destination charge in the United States and $2,130 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Nissan's first Kicks was, unique styling aside, was a bit of a letdown. The 2025 Nissan Kicks addresses what needed to be addressed -- it's a much better effort in the inexpensive compact-crossover class.


Regular TTAC readers will know that the Kicks underwent a thorough redesign for 2025, growing longer, wider, and taller. Passenger and cargo volume increase, as well.

It added ground clearance, got a new skin, a reworked cabin, and all-wheel drive finally became available.

Nissan also changed out the engine, swapping a 2.0-liter naturally-aspirated four-cylinder in place of a 1.6-liter four. The 2.0-liter pumps out 141 horsepower and 140 lb-ft of torque. Unfortunately, the sole available transmission remains a continuously-variable automatic.

During our first drive in Southern California, I complained about the Kicks needing more grunt for hilly two-lanes. That's not an issue in urban Chicago -- and the Kicks is primarily setup as a city car. That lack of torque is still annoying when it comes to freeway merging or passing, but for the stoplight-to-stoplight dash, it's fine.

It's a similar story with handling. Nissan's tuning for this model is much, much better than what was seen in the first-gen Kicks, and while this is no sports hatch, you'll be just fine in regular urban and suburban driving.

The ride is slightly stiff but acceptable even on Chicago's crappy streets, and the all-wheel drive system doesn't make the car feel especially heavy. As an urban runabout, this Kicks is better than the previous -- it's more engaging and even flirts with fun, without sacrificing utility or commuter comfort.

The new cabin is screen-heavy and uses haptic touch for the climate controls -- but as apprehensive as we can be about the latter, it works well enough in daily use. I don't recall having any difficulty getting the proper setting just right.

There's legroom and headroom aplenty up front, even for taller humans, but the roofline cuts into rear-seat headroom. At least legroom in back is acceptable, and the "Zero Gravity" seats in the front are very comfortable for long stints. I also dug the available Bose in-seat speakers.

There are downsides -- the lack of factory nav on top trims is an understandable cost-saver in a day and age when we all use smart-phone mirroring, but it will still annoy those few who don't use Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. As mentioned, acceleration is a bit lacking when the right foot goes to the floor. And at times, certain materials or noises remind you that you're not playing in high finance.

Speaking of pricing, the Kicks isn't cheap in SR trim with AWD, but it is reasonable. The base price for this top trim car is $27,680 and that number includes standard features like the all-wheel-drive system, automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-departure warning, intelligent lane intervention, blind-spot warning, blind-spot intervention, high-beam assist, hill-start assist, ProPilot Assist, 360-degree camera, traffic-sign recognition, intersection assist, front parking sensors, keyless entry and starting, leatherette seats, USB-C ports, wireless Apple CarPlay, wireless Android Auto, and LED exterior lighting.

Options included the $1,950 AWD Premium Package, which included the Bose audio, panoramic moonroof, heated mirrors, heated steering wheel, heated front seats, remote start, and rain-sensing wipers. Other options included splash guards ($250), crossbars ($355), 19-inch alloy wheels, spare tire ($180), and two-tone paint. Total price, including the $1,390 destination fee, was $32,485.

The second-gen Kicks is most of what the first-gen should've been. A pinch more sport and/or power wouldn't hurt, and you can tell where Nissan sought to cut costs if you look closely. But this generation is better-looking, more engaging to drive, and more comfortable inside. As a bonus for Snow Belters, you can get all-wheel drive.

Nissan set out to replace the Juke and Cube with the first-gen Kicks. It wasn't a total flop, but it didn't fully hit the mark.

That's not the case with the new one -- it's pretty on-target for what it's mission is.

Sometimes, the second chance is necessary.

[Images © 2025 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Selena Taylor Selena Taylor 18 hours ago

    This really feels like Nissan listened this time. The extra space, AWD, and improved ride make it far more livable day to day, especially in city driving and winter conditions.


    Power is still the weak spot, but as a practical urban crossover, it finally makes sense. Would you trade a bit more fuel use for a stronger engine option?

  • Big Oil Big Oil 6 hours ago

    There's nothing wrong with this vehicle that an old fashioned V8 couldn't fix.

  • Bookish So some lawyer comes up with a scam to shake down the auto industry and the NYT makes it an ethical crusade against Ford. And you repeat it moralistically and uncritically.
  • Normie "Big Oil"From OZ?
  • AZFelix This generation of Cadillac articles also shows consistent placement of photos relative to the corresponding text.
  • Biff Finally the chickens have come home to roost. I have been saying this for three years: just wait until the EV’ers have to pay the road tax. Lets not forget that it’s California we are talking about and they have never met a tax they didn’t like. Plus it’s “the rich” buying new cars so its a double “lets tax’em!” The solution is simple enough. Have EV’s go into emissions stations as part of license plate renewal. Except here record the milage and get a bill for the cost. The rate should be around 1.5X the comparable gas size vehicle due to added weight. Lets watch the progessive politics swallow this one!
  • Big Oil You could of had a V8.
Next