Power Study Claims Technology Glitches Hurting Vehicle Dependability

Michael Strong
by Michael Strong

Advances in vehicle technology have resulted in improved safety while making cars rolling communications and entertainment hubs, but complexity invites problems, and that’s why J.D. Power’s 2026 U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study shows vehicle dependability declined at the highest rate since 2022. 


“(P)ersistent  problems with infotainment systems, spotty performance of over-the-air (OTA) software updates, and issues with vehicle exteriors have driven long-term dependability problems to new highs,” Power officials noted in a statement.

Going back more than a decade, regardless of the overall results, the biggest problem for automakers when it comes to dependability has been infotainment technology, and that was the case again in the current study. Power noted that of the nine categories measured, infotainment systems accounted for 56.7 of the problem per 100 cars (56.7 PP100). Exterior issues were next on the list at 27.5 PP100.

As owners hold onto their vehicles longer, the long-term ownership experience matters more than ever," said Jason Norton, director of auto benchmarking at J.D. Power. "Software updates and new technologies should enhance the ownership experience over time, yet many vehicle owners cite ongoing mobile phone integration problems and little to no benefit after an update is performed.”


Of the top five industry problems, four are directly related to owner integration of mobile phones to their vehicles, including the top issue in the industry for a third consecutive year — Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity (8.9 PP100). 

Coupled with built-in Bluetooth systems (5.5 PP100), wireless charging pads (5.1 PP100), and OEM app connectivity (4.7 PP100), these issues account for 24.2 PP100, nearly half of the infotainment category problems in total. Issues with the vehicle exterior, such as abnormal noises, also contribute to the overall increase in reported problems.

Overall, vehicles finished with an average of 204 PP100, which is an increase of 2 PP100 compared to 2025. The lower the number, the higher the dependability, Power notes. Mainstream brands have a better average than luxury models, in large measure due to the amount of infotainment technology in those vehicles. Mainstream models (200 PP100) outperformed luxury vehicles (217 PP100) in seven of the nine categories measured. 


Despite that, the brand with the best score was Lexus, a luxury brand, at 151 PP100. It marked the fourth straight year Toyota’s luxury unit has topped the study. For the second consecutive year, Buick topped the mainstream brands at 160 PP100, and it was second overall behind Lexus. The top three luxury brands were Lexus, Cadillac (175 PP100), and Porsche (182 PP100). Mini (168 PP100) and Chevrolet (178 PP100) were second and third respectively behind Buick on the mainstream rankings.

However, if you’re looking for a specific model and you want dependability, go for a Toyota or a Lexus as combined they were tops in eight model segments (Lexus IS, Lexus UX, Lexus GX, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Camry, Toyota Tacoma, Toyota Sienna, and Toyota 4Runner). General Motors was next best with four winners: Buick Enclave, Cadillac XT6, Chevrolet Equinox, and Chevy Tahoe.

The study also revealed that the push by some automakers to eliminate plug-in hybrids also might eliminate some headaches for owners. PHEVs were the most problematic vehicles in the study at 281 PP100, a 39-point increase year-over-year. Conversely, gas-powered vehicles improved by two points to 198 PP100.


[Images: Lexus, Buick, Mini, Chevrolet]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Michael Strong
Michael Strong

Michael Strong has spent more than 25 years writing about the automotive industry. A Detroit-area native, he’s written about everything from local car shows to product reviews to financial news. Currently he writes and edits for a variety of national and local publications. He’s also a longtime member of the Automotive Press Association and the International Motor Press Association, and a graduate of Georgia Southern University. Hail Southern! Despite a love for ’70s land yachts and BMWs from the late ’80s and early ’90s, his personal vehicle is neither of those.

More by Michael Strong

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 19 comments
  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Feb 16, 2026

    Software heavy products do not contain “glitches” or “bugs” or “odd behaviors”. Call them what they are….defects. Would you tolerate an engine or transmission that stops running correctly after a month of use?


    Software defects should be treated the same as mechanical defects.

  • Big Oil Big Oil on Feb 17, 2026

    Like Big Oil says, 'Rip out your infotainment system, and put in a V-12'

    • Lloyd Bonified Lloyd Bonified on Feb 18, 2026

      Why would I need to rip out my infotainment for that? How about just make it work right


  • Oberkanone Dacia makes product line of affordable vehicles. An entire product line. One vehicle is not the answer for all needs. Dacia does affordable well.
  • YaMoBeThere This is an egregiously bad AI generated article, the middle of the article is repeated twice... but yea go ahead and nitpick about my comment pointing that out
  • Slavuta Is this Ok if I use OEM all weather floor mats? Yes, the ones that came with 2011 Mazda3 were not good. But the ones in 2017 Mazda6 are excellent. BTW, in that picture, Grand Cherokee on Kumho tires. Is this also an advert or just coincidence?
  • Bar170111344 "GM was on track to spend $31.7 billion on compliance technology through 2031."I'll just mention, that expenditure would have gone into research and development, and that would have driven U.S. manufacturing innovation. On the industrial side, R&D is necessary for U.S. manufacturers to remain competitive in the world. It's absolutely no surprise China is running rings around us. The prospective $ savings GM is looking forward to hasn't impressed the stock market. Year-to-date return of -5.65%. -7.05% in the last month. PE 20:1, inflated by the falling share price. Not to be insulting by any stretch, but it has never been like Mary Barra to get out ahead of anything. She's not an innovator and not a risk taker. She's a good engineer.Honestly - in that industry, which I worked in for decades, being regulated is like having a security blanket. You can be mediocre, blame it on regulation, and still make a buck. And with the federal government now digging an even deeper moat around GM and Ford, it's clearly suppressing American innovation and excellence.
  • Jks168824641 Mercedes, 2023 GLC 300’s start/stop feature is so smooth and seamless that I hardly notice it. I really appreciate it in slow traffic or drive through lanes for fast food
Next