Volvo Abandons Lidar Technology After Dropping Supplier
Volvo looks to be abandoning lidar. Viewed by some as an essential technology for advanced driving features and so-called autonomous cars, some companies have managed to achieve promising results without lidar. After seeming wholly committed to the technology, Volvo will now be joining the ranks of those that go without.
However, the company’s reasoning seems to have more to do with supplier issues than technical concerns. The Swedish-Chinese automaker previously made lidar an optional item when it was formerly standard on its most-expensive models.
While our initial assumption was that it had everything to do with some owners simply not using the relevant features or the company wanting to upsell the hardware, it came out that Volvo Cars wasn’t getting along with Luminar — the company that supplies its lidar systems.
But, this week, it said it wouldn’t be offering it at all on new models.
“Volvo Cars has decided to remove the lidar sensor from its EX90 and ES90 cars and discontinue its relationship with supplier Luminar,” a Volvo Cars spokesperson explained to The Drive on Tuesday. “Volvo Cars has made this decision to limit the company’s supply chain risk exposure and it is a direct result of Luminar’s failure to meet its contractual obligations to Volvo Cars.
“To meet customer demand, be able to offer the Volvo EX90 and the ES90 cars to more customers as well as limit the company’s supply chain risk exposure, Volvo Cars had previously made the decision to make lidar optional on these vehicles starting 2026. The termination of the agreement with Luminar means lidar will no longer be offered on any EX90 or ES90 car from Model Year 2026 onwards.”
Luminar has been having financial issues. However, it is strange that Volvo seems to be moving away from the technology without an obvious backup plan.
Volvo could be opting to go without lidar henceforth, which is something Tesla has been doing for ages. This proves that you don’t need lidar to offer hands-free driving. But testing has indicated that using both provides the greatest benefit. Camera and lidar based systems both have — for lack of a better term — their own unique blindspots.
In addition to the obvious privacy concerns, camera systems sometimes have issues interpreting data when visibility is poor. Older systems showed clear problems being blinded by glare. But this has been dealt with by adding additional cameras and improving software.
Lidar also has some limitations. As useful as it is in digitally mapping the road ahead, it can be thrown off by heavy precipitation. Fog is even worse, as it both absorbs and scatters the lasers. This is why you might notice some of the more “advanced” features in your vehicle going offline whenever the weather begins to become uncooperative.
The Drive likewise noted that lidar can damage a camera lens by destroying the pixels on the relevant image sensors and provided video evidence of it happening. That’s something that could become an issue over time, especially since many modern cars also come with camera arrays that are tied to numerous features.
While those producing the technology have assured everyone that it is totally safe and required to meet a minimum safety standard, there have been lingering concerns that every modern vehicle on the road throwing out lasers could pose a long-term health risk to human eyes. The same goes for any cameras equipped to automobiles. However, the wide-angle most vehicular cameras tend to use could help minimize the risk.
Some automakers are clearly pivoting away from lidar-based technologies. While useful for mapping, they’re more expensive than camera-based alternatives. Concerns about recalibration have also raised questions about maintenance. A filthy car can similarly nullify their usefulness, though this also applies to camera-only systems.
We’ll be interested to see if Volvo opts to continue snubbing lidar, or runs back to the technology once it has found a more-agreeable supplier.
[Images: Volvo Cars]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Peeryog Everytime I see one I am reminded of the current Santa Fe. And vice versa.
- Original Guy I watched that Moscow parade thing. (With the Cyrillic captions because my Russian is a little rough.) I won't give the whole thing away, but it started off with a couple of dudes riding around in stupid useless convertibles, standing up like Hitler, who I'm pretty sure was an actual Nazi. They drove around in circles and kept stopping to ask if anyone had seen all the missing military equipment, and all the guys kept moaning back, that no, they hadn't, ask the next section of guys.They looked around for someone shorter and sicker-looking than Putin but they were unsuccessful so they let him speak.The North Korean military was there, I guess the invasion has begun. The North Korean guys were skinny but their rifles were nicely polished, I guess they have plenty of time on their hands between meals.Some of the Russian military guys carried little white flags, I assume they keep those handy in case they run across any U.S. Marines.
- Marc J Rauch EBFlexing on ur mom - Ethanol is compatible with more types of rubber, plastic, and metal than gasoline and aromatics. This means that ethanol is less corrosive. The bottom line is that long before ethanol could have any damaging effect on any engine component, gasoline and aromatics would have already damaged the components. And the addition of ethanol doesn't exacerbate the problems caused by gasoline and aromatics; it actually helps mitigate them.
- Original Guy Today I learned that a reverse brake bleeder (and a long borescope) can be helpful if you are autistic and don't have any friends and no one wants to work with you to bleed your brakes. Also it is quick, once you figure out the process.When Canada assembled my truck back in circa 1995, they apparently used a different clip to attach the brake pedal (and switch) to the brake booster than what is technically called for. It is tough to realize this when the spring steel clip flies off to who knows where. Of course I ordered the wrong clip trying to match the style that I saw buried up in the dash before it flew away. My truck now has the 'correct' clip, everyone can relax.I ordered some more brake fluid (DOT 3, nothing fancy) but it turns out I still have two fresh bottles (my shelves aren't empty, I just have too many shelves).Went to install my fancy new Optima YellowTop battery and it turns out I need a new side post terminal bolt. (Yet another order placed, bring on THE TARIFFS.) It would be a shame to strip out the threads on a nice new battery, no?Good news: The longer it takes me to get my truck started again, the more I save on fuel. 😁
- Normie Weekends here would be a great time for everyone to join in praise of dog dish hubcaps on body-color matched steelies!
Comments
Join the conversation
But it requires brain.
Q: What do you call a "Swedish-Chinese automaker"?
A: Chinese