Chrysler May See All-New SRT Performance Models
Chrysler is allegedly about to enjoy a major renaissance. Chrysler CEO Christine Feuell has made overt promises that things are about to change. She has issued statements that the brand will not only start seeing new models, with assurances that some of those will see performance-focused SRT variants, but also a renewed focus on building affordable luxury cars.
“I am so excited to bring back SRT,” she told Mopar Insiders late in November. “I can tell you after meeting with my counterparts Tim Kuniskis and Matt McAlear we got a really awesome plan for SRT. It’s a great opportunity for us to bring back the performance brands and products that have been so iconic in the past as we look to the future.”
“To cut to the chase, I think you can expect to see some SRT models under the Chrysler brand.”
At this point, a lot of automotive enthusiasts were just waiting around for Stellantis to eliminate the nameplate. When Fiat Chrysler Automobiles was bought out by France’s PSA Group, the newly formed management team (Stellantis) suggested that the struggling American brands would be given heavy support for a couple of years before any decisions about their fate were made.
But the level of actual support being offered has been highly questionable, particularly at Chrysler. Jeep looks to have been a priority from the start, as does Ram (albeit to a lesser extent). Dodge received an updated version of the Charger, including an electrified variant that was probably a mistake, and the admittedly decent Hornet crossover (pictured) that nobody bought. Dodge has since issued promises that V8 engines would return.
This is apparently due to consumer sentiment and a shift in management. Whereas former Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares seemed EV obsessed and not particularly interested in the American brands, new-CEO Antonio Filosa seems more welcoming of combustion and appears aware that customers in the United States have tastes that differ from Europe.
The new strategy is to pivot Stellantis’ American brands to refocus on their roots whilst maintaining a level of affordability. Dodge will be the practical performance brand, Ram will retain its focus on trucks, Jeep will keep being jeep, and Chrysler will support “blue-collar luxury.”
Considering Chrysler hasn’t received much help to speak of over the past decade, any action would be meaningful. Now limited to a few different versions of the same minivan (below), the brand isn’t even a shadow of its former self.
In its heyday, Chrysler sold cars that offered cutting-edge vehicle technologies, unparalleled luxury, and oodles of performance — a feat that lasted into the early 1970s. However, as the years rolled on, the company found itself in serious financial trouble and pivoted to innovative models with lower price tags. It also invented the minivan during this “turnaround era” under Lee Iacocca.
While Chrysler eventually attempted to reenter the luxury space by reintroducing the iconic 300 in 2005, the rest of its lineup continued to shrink as its flagship sedan developed a bit of a reputation. Your author always loved the model, as it offered a good balance of comfort and performance at a price that felt downright reasonable. But the company never really bothered updating the model, similar to the Dodge Charger/Challenger it shared its platform with.
That has only made the car more desirable to some drivers who bemoan the ways in which vehicles have been “modernized” and certainly helped keep pricing down. But it also arguably hurt the brand’s image and ensured the Chrysler lineup would continue to dwindle. No new models have come from the nameplate since 2017 and the previously stated plan was to gradually pivot the marque toward all-electric vehicles. But that never happened either.
With the Charger back in action, there’s certainly a chance the 300 sedan could return as an SRT model. However, it would presumably utilize the 3.0-liter Hurricane twin-turbo I6 found and not the old 6.1-liter or 6.4-liter HEMI V8 that went into the 300 SRT8. Due to the lack of interest, an all-electric powertrain seems unlikely. But Stellantis has expressed that it plans on building more V8 motors, now that emission laws are supposed to be relaxing.
And, let’s face it, Mopar fans tend to like more power and larger engines whenever possible.
Returning the V8 to Chrysler is speculative on our part. However, it does sound as though the brand will be doing some extensive sharing with Dodge and Alfa Romeo on their STLA platform cars, both of which will leverage the spicy Hurricane motor, moving forward. That said, electrification hasn't been removed from the conversation entirely.
“Our new STLA multi-energy platforms, as well as our existing platforms, are engineered to offer a variety of powertrain options, including internal combustion, hybrid, and electric,” stated Feuell.
“To better meet the needs of our customers and provide freedom of choice across our offerings, both Chrysler and Alfa Romeo are pursuing multi-energy powertrain strategies for our future product lineup.”
Beyond promises that Chrysler will be getting SRT models and a revised lineup, we don’t have much to go on. Still, leadership has offered some firm statements on the matter. Chrysler will apparently be getting new models with Stellantis’ new management indicating that nobody wants to see the brand being dropped.
“I want to put to rest any thoughts, rumors, or assumptions that it is being sold. It is not,” Feuell explained. “Like I said, Antonio Filosa is now at the helm of the company, he believes in Chrysler, he is rebuilding our portfolio, and he is doubling down his investment to grow in the North American market and reclaim leadership in all of our brands.”
Officially, we know Chrysler wants to offer an entry level model priced below $30,000, a couple of crossover vehicles, and a sedan (that we assume will be the returning 300). It also plans on offering a totally revised version of the Pacifica van — most of which is supposed to take place within the next year or two.
“One of the things that is very important for us to prioritize though is affordability… we are working on a small car or whether you call it a compact car, but something that can transact under $30,000… something that will be beautiful and fun to drive and aspirational, because you want people to feel proud… that it’s wearing a Chrysler badge,” noted the CEO.
It feels early to be super optimistic about Chrysler. But this is also the first time we’ve had reason to hold any real hope for the company in quite a while. Any automaker that’s willing to even consider performance-variants of a minivan is one that you kind of want to root for.
[Images: Stellantis]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
How 'bout this for an idea, Chrysler - instead of doing a new 300 as sedan only, why not do a 300 coupe as well, based on the Charger? The Charger is a total barge, which doesn't work for a sporty car, but as, say, a 21st century reinterpretation of an Imperial or a 300 letter car, the size is *chef's kiss*. Might just give the brand some shine.
Product! Product! Product!
A Chrysler 300 based on the Dodge Charger, but with its own sheet metal and suspension tuning, should have been a no-brainer. Similarly you'd think they'd come up with some crossovers for Dodge and Chrysler based on restyled versions of existing Jeep models and/or some of the crossovers they sell in Europe (Citroen, DS, Peugeot, Fiat, Opel, Vauxhall).
Finally, high-performance luxury models equipped with Hemi V-8s and 3.0-liter Hurricane twin-turbo I6s are all well and good, but let's not overlook smaller displacement and lower-performance bread and butter engines. Chrysler sold an awful lot of 300s equipped with the Pentastar V-6 which offered a balanced blend of performance, fuel economy and refinement.