Canada Rezones Brampton To Sway Stellantis On Vehicle Production

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

It’s no secret that Canada is worried about automotive jobs and is doing what it can to guarantee there'll be more in the future. This now includes rezoning the land where the currently idle Brampton Assembly Plant is located.


Production at the site has been suspended since 2023 without any clear plan regarding what will be next for the facility. Stellantis had originally planned to use the site to manufacture the updated Jeep Compass. But plans were changed and domestic assembly (slated to commence in 2027) was shifted to Belvidere, Illinois, while production had already kicked off in Italy.


Brampton was formerly responsible for building the Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger and Dodge Challenger. But it has almost 40 years of history putting together automobiles in the rear window — with almost the entire timeframe being dedicated to Chrysler legacy brands.


Exactly why Stellantis didn’t stick with Brampton is up for debate. Officially, Stellantis said it was concerned about tariffs. But it had already been dragging its feet on retooling Brampton prior to Trump taking office. Still, we know the site was making some amount of progress before the plug was finally pulled in 2025.

Regardless, the local government is worried about there being 3,000 fewer jobs in Ontario and has opted to try and force Stellantis to make use of the facility. According to Automotive News, the Brampton city council voted unanimously to rezone the land exclusively for automotive assembly and parts production.


"If Stellantis thinks they can go and build condos there, they can fly a kite. This is for auto jobs," Brampton mayor Patrick Brown said during the council meeting.


The obvious intent of the rezoning plan is to encourage the automaker to utilize the facility and discourage it from selling the land to developers. Unifor (Canada’s auto union) has praised the action.


“Our members in Brampton have demanded that all levels of government take action to protect the future of their plant and their jobs and we are pleased to see this concrete action by the city,” said Unifor National President Lana Payne. “Permanently designating Canada’s existing auto footprint for vehicle manufacturing only is smart industrial policy and I commend Mayor Brown and all Brampton City Councillors for working with our union to get this done.”


But Stellantis hasn’t said much on the matter. Officially, the company has stated that it’s likewise interested in utilizing Brampton Assembly for the purposes of vehicle manufacturing. It just hasn’t gotten around to determining what that will entail. However, a spokesperson said that protecting jobs was among the company’s "top priorities" and that Stellantis was actively evaluating what to do with the site in a way that would guarantee a long-term, sustainable commitment to suppliers, employees, and the community.


That certainly sounds like the automaker is taking the matter very seriously. But it also lacks any firm commitments. Still, allocating production isn’t something that a smart business should take lightly and Brampton would be best served by a higher-volume product. That’s likely of little consolation to the 3,000 out-of-work autoworkers, however.


While Canada hasn’t been the world’s second-largest producer of automobiles in decades, the industry remains important. It often comes up in political discussions, especially those pertaining to the retention of domestic jobs in Ontario. Canada remains an essential component of North American vehicle production.


However, the country currently finds itself in a complicated situation. Manufacturing jobs have steadily declined since their peak in 1999. Layoffs were initially attributed to advancements in automation. But it gradually became clear that automakers were shifting production to Mexico in an effort to lower production costs. This accelerated in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.


Since then, Canadian officials have managed to secure investments from numerous automakers to pivot factories toward building all-electric vehicles. Driven strongly by the Canadian government trying to tempt the industry with incentives, the first big commitment came from Stellantis in 2023. This was followed by similar commitments from other brands (e.g. Honda), with the focus often being on electrification.


But there are growing concerns that the estimated employment figures will be much lower than originally assumed. Stagnating EV sales, accompanied by the United States walking back stringent emission controls and automakers revising investment promises, have resulted in real questions about how much business Canada’s forthcoming EV production will actually yield.


Canada has even walked back some of its own electrification targets. The nation previously had an EV mandate requiring 20 percent of new vehicles sold in the country to be entirely electric by 2026 and 60 percent by 2030. Total electrification was supposed to occur by 2035. But it has become abundantly clear that those metrics aren’t remotely achievable, especially in a region that’s subject to cold climates that can sap the maximum range of EVs.


This has placed real pressure on labor unions and politicians promising jobs stemming from electric vehicle production. However, sales targets have only been walked back slightly. Canadian leadership still has a mandate to see majority EV sales well before 2035 and has even freed itself up to bring in Chinese brands to make sure that happens.


[Images: JHVEPhoto/Shutterstock; Stellantis]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 61 comments
  • InCogKneeToe InCogKneeToe on Mar 02, 2026

    Expropriate it. Dead Land right now, Government Grants to Stellantis, not supplying any Jobs.


    So simple fact. Repay the Grants, or lose the Property. Stellantis, would wind up Saving Money, on Environmental Clean Up.


    China could then have a Starting Point for Manufacturing Autos in Canada.



  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Mar 02, 2026

    To clarify some errors and present more perspective.


    The Canadian government/Canada did not rezone anything. Zoning is municipal so only the City of Brampton would rezone. However the provincial government can use its powers to overule municipal zoning, if a petition is made to it.


    American Motors originally established a manufacturing facility in Brampton in 1961. It operated until 1992 and produced just under 1.3 million vehicles.


    The current Brampton facility was opened in 1986 by AMC/Renault, primarily to produce the Eagle Premier. When Chrysler purchased AMC in 1987 there were 3 primary reasons for doing so. These were i) Jeep brand, ii) the LH platform and iii) the new Brampton manufacturing facility. which was 'state of the art' and superior to any facilities that Chrysler owned/operated at that time.


    Between its opening and 2023 the new Brampton facility manufacturedd approximately 7,150,00 vehicles.

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next