Report: GM Requiring Customers to Spend $1,500 for OnStar

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky


General Motors is reportedly making OnStar standard equipment for all new Buick, Cadillac, and GMC models. However, it's also been alleged that the company will be forcing customers of those brands into a three-year subscription for the "Connected Services Premium Plan" that'll cost roughly $1,500 and represent the latest example of how automakers are leveraging subscription fees to improve their overall profitability.


OnStar originated in 1996 as a collaboration between GM, Electronic Data Systems, and the Hughes Electronics Corporation. While primarily marketed as a way to notify police and rescue services in the event of an emergency, the system likewise featured vehicle tracking designed to locate car thieves in real-time. But it's gradually been built up to incorporate the ability to remotely slow vehicles that have been reported as stolen and offers an array of connected services tied to various subscription packages. These can include Wi-Fi hot spots, video/audio streaming services, additional keyless entry options (using a phone app), integration of Amazon's Alexa into the vehicle, enhanced GPS navigation, on-demand vehicle diagnostics, roadside assistance, automatic crash notifications when a driver has been incapacitated, and plenty more.


Customers even have the option to share their driving data with insurance agencies to get discounted rates. However, this has opened the service to some criticism as it's previously been reported that OnStar is likely susceptible to remote activation by malicious third parties or government agencies. The company also stated in 2011 that it would begin retaining all the data collected by the GPS and internal data logging systems so it could be sold off. While the information was said to be anonymized prior to being delivered to any third parties, privacy advocate groups questioned how that would be possible and bemoaned the fact that OnStar would even consider selling the private information of paying customers. The mounting pressure encouraged the business to change its mind on the issue. But testing has shown that the system still tracked the relevant data and a surprising amount of other information (e.g. calling history) as of 2019.


That last bit is of key relevance, as General Motors seems to have uncovered a new way of profiting off the service — forcing people to buy it.


Last year, GM told investors that software subscriptions would become an $80-billion industry in the near future and followed up in 2021 by suggesting some of its customers could soon be spending $135 a month for various subscriptions it planned on adding in addition to their monthly car payment.


But this isn't something that's exclusive to the American automaker. German manufacturers have been ahead of the curve when it comes to subscription fees (though Tesla and GM aren't far behind) and the whole industry has been on a quest to find the best ways to maximize margins using connected services for years now.


By forcing customers to pay for an OnStar system that's already been equipped to their cars, whether they use it or not, General Motors has effectively found a sly way to raise the price of all vehicles by $1,500 without announcing a sizable price hike for each individual model. Pricing increases have become brutally common due to supply chain disruptions and record levels of inflation. Though it's hard to feel any sympathy for most brands when the whole industry still can't seem to manage ongoing component problems, has been enjoying healthy profits despite the diminished output, and will be getting massive EV subsidies from the same governments that devalued currency via unfettered spending. Meanwhile, a lot of brands and suppliers are prepping for sizable layoffs as they won't need as many employees after transitioning to all-electric fleets.


It seems like a snake eating its own tail from my vantage. But nobody wants to report quarterly losses as the economy continues to curdle, so businesses are desperate to find ways of raising prices that won't totally enrage cash-strapped customers.


A GMC spokesperson told the Detroit Free Press, which first broke the story, that the company decided to make the connected services standard because it would be "more convenient for our customers and provides a more seamless on-boarding experience."


You may have already paid for the service without even realizing it. Since June 2nd, all new Buick and GMC vehicles sold in the U.S. have included three years of OnStar's Connected Services Premium Plan under options & pricing for $1,500. Though it's not actually an option since the subscription is baked into the MSRP. Cadillac similarly started including it on certain vehicles as of June 18th, starting with the Escalade.


So, what are customers getting for the money? Well, the formerly free items (e.g. vehicle diagnostics, dealer maintenance notifications, and GM's in-car marketplace) haven't gone anywhere and the Premium Plan adds Wi-Fi, automatic crash response, roadside assistance, turn-by-turn navigation, remote keyless features, and more.


If those things sound good to you, then there's probably little about the price hike that grinds your gears. But, if you like your vehicles to be a little less nosy or feel like your phone offers all the connectivity you need, then you might find the additional fees more than a little unsavory.


[Image: General Motors]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Raven65 Raven65 on Aug 15, 2022

    This is utter BS and people need to push back hard against it by refusing to buy the affected vehicles. I find it interesting that this only applies to Buick, Cadillac, and GMC... the "premium" GM brands. I guess they're betting that the people who buy these brands won't balk at a $1500 shakedown (and they may be right). I just read an article about the redesigned Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon twins that are about to start production. This will definitely push people away from the GMC toward the Chevy. Why does GMC still exist anyway? I can't believe they kept that division around back when they went bankrupt, reorganized and shed Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Saturn, and Hummer - given that GMCs are literally nothing more than rebadged Chevys. Nobody uses OnStar... and FORCING people to subscribe to it is not going to make it any more relevant. It just needs to go away.

  • Mikey Mikey on Aug 15, 2022

    I was pi$$ed when GM dumped Pontiac ..I had an on off affair with Ford .. Moving forward, its all "Bow Tie " for this guy.

  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next