GM Firing Hundreds While Bringing In Foreign Workers
General Motors is gearing up for several hundred layoffs, with the brunt of the culled positions pertaining to information technology (IT). This is interesting because the cuts come shortly after CEO Mary Barra touted the company’s pivot to allowing artificial intelligence to handle software development. However, we also know that the automaker is still hiring in the same fields that are seeing layoffs, often bringing in foreign workers from outside the country.
News of the layoffs circulated on forums before being covered by Bloomberg, which estimated that the automaker planned on eliminating 500-600 jobs starting this week. Most of these positions were located in Warren, Michigan, or Austin, Texas. Many pertain to vehicle software development, coding, telematics, cybersecurity, and other careers related to information technology.
“GM is transforming its Information Technology organization to better position the company for the future. As part of that work, we have made the difficult decision to eliminate certain roles globally. We are grateful for the contributions of the employees affected and are committed to supporting them through this transition,” the automaker stated.
However, we know that the company still has nearly 100 open positions related to software development and artificial intelligence. Perhaps more concerning is the prospect that some of these layoffs may have been done to help make way for cheap imported labor.
GM has numerous H1B applications still on the books for 2026, most of which look to be seeing software and engineering specialists to come to the exact same parts of the country that are seeing layoffs. In fact, GM is often considered one of the largest importers of visaed workers.
If we examine the company’s Labor Condition Applications (LCAs), we can clearly see that GM recently brought on countless employees to fill the very same positions that are now seeing hundreds of layoffs. It also looks keen to continue this trend through 2026.
We can clearly see that GM has at least 44 applications for Warren, Michigan, alone for this year. The listed jobs frequently pertain to software development, software testing, programming, engineering, and vehicle design. Another five H1Bs were slated for Austin, Texas.
All told, we know of the company having made at least 132 separate H1B Labor Condition Applications between January and June of 2026. Most of these are mostly six-figure positions located in Michigan and would assuredly have contributed to the current layoffs to some degree.
A spokesperson from the automaker indicated that they were not authorized to speak publicly about the layoffs. But why would they even want to when the most truthful answer would presumably require them to discuss laying off the native workforce to bring in cheaper foreign labor?
We expect companies to reevaluate their existing workforce. It’s something GM seems to do on an almost annual basis, typically focusing on individual departments. However, without some much-needed transparency and some rational explanations, this is still likely to end up being an incredibly bad look for General Motors.
Automakers have just spent the last several years raking in record-breaking profits while their customers have been stressing about the cost of living and swelling vehicle pricing. It’d be surprising to learn that customers would be hunky dory with the premise that one of America’s largest employers is using artificial intelligence and imported foreign labor to eliminate domestic jobs. These are already contentious issues and have only become more so over time.
[Images: General Motors; Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
- Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
- Pwrwrench IIRC the most efficient version of the CRX was not sold in California, due to the "tune" of the 50+ mpg engine not meeting the emissions standards. The ones sold in California were rated in the upper 40s.Also, nearly all of these that I saw in SoCal were red, except for a few white ones.
Comments
Join the conversation
My very first car was a 10 year old Pontiac convertible - $350 cash. I married into a ‘68 Camaro RS. My first brand new car was a ‘79 Buick Regal Limited 2 door hardtop, G- Body, a real stunner in midnight metallic blue with tan velour interior (no half vinyl top). Ordered it from the factory at the local dealership. $5200 cash. Picked it up 6 weeks later when l was deathly-ill w/the flu. I was SO excited! That car rattled itself to death w/less than 50,000 miles inside of 4 years. That was the last GM car I ever owned. My current vehicle is an ‘11 Nissan Frontier SV 4x4, made in TN, purchased used, still solid. I’m happy with it.
aliens Roswell builder burg nicotine Flint