3.1K Views
Junkyard Find: 1984 Pontiac 6000 STE
by
Murilee Martin
(IC: employee)
Published: February 21st, 2022
Share
The General built cars based on the front-wheel-drive A platform (no, not that other GM A platform) for the 1982 through 1996 model years, with the profoundly unmemorable Chevy Celebrity as the most numerous type. Of all the millions of these A-Bodies that roamed American roads, the most interesting was the Pontiac 6000 Special Touring Edition, a sporty sedan version made to compete with the growing menace of speedy German and technology-stuffed Japanese machines. I managed to find an extremely rare early 6000 STE in a California boneyard in December, so let’s take a look.
The Pontiac Division was on a roll by the middle 1980s, reacquiring some of the old youthful-performance luster it enjoyed during the heyday of John DeLorean’s rule in the 1960s. This was a time when a Ypsilanti transmission assembler could become a Knight Rider star and then feature in a cheesecakey Pontiac calendar, and it seemed possible that Pontiac would soon strike fear into corporate hearts from Yokohama to Munich.
Of course, that all fell apart soon enough and the Pontiac Division spent the 1990s becoming decreasingly relevant, finally getting stuffed into The Crusher in 2010 after a long downward spiral. But the 6000 STE, for all its weaknesses, was one fascinating machine. Its dash bristled with dozens and dozens of bewilderingly tiny buttons and switches, and the instrument cluster looked like a video game. Take that, Nissan Maxima and Mitsubishi Tredia! Best of all, Pontiac ignored complaints from befuddled customers who couldn’t figure out the controls in the early 6000 STEs and doubled down by installing even more buttons to the later models. Even the very weird Subaru XT couldn’t out-science-fiction the late-80s 6000 STE!
The interiors appeared to have come from futuristic orbiting palaces built by a superior intergalactic civilization… that is, a superior intergalactic civilization that prized Michigan petro-velour and a tan-to-burgundy color palette above all other considerations. This one features lovely gold-and-plum upholstery and trim, which has held up very well after 37 years of California sun. Naturally, the 6000 STE came standard with air conditioning, power everything, a nice audio system, all the stuff that cost extra in most Detroit sedans of the time.
While it had the gadgetry and econo-plush interior to compete with Nissan, Subaru, and Mitsubishi, the 6000 STE’s true rivals hailed from Europe. To beat BMW and Audi, the 6000 STE needed power and plenty of it. For 1984, that meant the high-output version of the 2.8-liter V6 engine, rated at a pretty decent 130 horsepower. The BMW 528e had a mere 121 horses that year, while the Audi 5000 Turbo got the same 130. Sure, The General’s 60° V6 had pushrods and— for the 135 horsepower 2.8— a carburetor, but horsepower is horsepower (to be fair, the 528e annihilated the 6000 STE on torque, with 170 versus 145 pound-feet). The 6000 STE got a stiff suspension, quick steering ratio, and sticky 195/75R14 radials as well, and I’m just sad that Audi 5000-versus-Pontiac 6000 STE chase scenes didn’t become a staple of cop TV shows (the 5000 did become a staple of the TV news, however).
Unfortunately, lots of BMW and Audi buyers insisted on three pedals in those days, and the only transmission available on the ’84 6000 STE was a decidedly antiquated three-speed automatic. Later on, the 6000 STE got an optional four-speed automatic and even optional all-wheel-drive, but the primitive powertrains hurt sales just as much as they did with the Buick Reatta, Oldsmobile Troféo, and Cadillac Allanté.
Of all the GM A-Body sedans of 1984, the 6000 STE was by far the most expensive. The Celebrity sedan listed at $7,881, the Olds Cutlass Ciera Brougham was $9,712, the Buick Century T-Type was $10,674… and the 6000 STE cost $14,428 (about $39,805 in 2022 dollars). Meanwhile, a new ’84 Nissan Maxima cost $11,399, an Audi 5000S was $16,480 ($22,250 with turbocharging), a BMW 528e had a $24,565 MSRP, and— if you were willing to live with two doors instead of four— a new Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe and its 145 overhead-cam horsepower listed at just $12,354.
These cars do have a small-but-maniacal following today, so I expect that this one will have been stripped clean of STE-specific goodies by the time you read this.For links to 2,200+ additional Junkyard Finds, please visit the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.
#1980s
#1984
#1984Pontiac6000
#AmericanSedan
#CompactLuxurySedan
#DownOnTheJunkyard
#GMAPlatform
#Junk
#Junkyard
#JunkyardFind
#Pontiac
#Sedan
#Technology
#Sedans
#LuxurySedan
#Pontiac6000
#Pontiac6000STE
Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Hagerty and The Truth About Cars.
More by Murilee Martin
Published February 21st, 2022 9:00 AM
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
We sold quite a few of these when we had our used dealership back in the 90's and early 00's. I remember only one that had a carburetor and believe it to have been a 1984. The rest were 85-87's. The 87's switched over to the gen II 2.8 V6's which were great little engines that could pack on 200-300K with no sweat and the 3 speed, although low tech, was also a very sturdy unit with the main fault being the lockup torque converter solenoid. These cars also had 4 wheel disk brakes and had far better/sharper handling and braking than normal A-body cars of the time. The only issues I recall having with a few of them were the typical A-body morning steering sickness on left turns which we remedied with Trans X and fresh fluid and a few minor interior items. They seemed to be overall pretty reliable otherwise according to the folks we sold them too and several actually came back to buy another for their college kids or as a second car. They were a success for us!
Still have a 1987 6000 STE with only 87000 miles on it. Drive it about 100 per year.