Ford Econoline -- It Changed how Vans Were Built
The 1961 Econoline Van and Ford Club Wagon and Cab over pickup when introduced were going to change the way everyone in the industry built a van.
Development began in 1957 and it was to replace the F-series Panel delivery.
Click through on the video to see how the way Ford influenced change.
For more Ford related content subscribe here: https://www.youtube.com/c/TonysFordsa...
The TTAC Creators Series tells stories and amplifies creators from all corners of the car world, including culture, dealerships, collections, modified builds and more.
A transcript, created by AI and edited by a staffer, is below.
[Image: Tony's Fords and Mustangs/YouTube]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Transcript:
The 1961 Econoline van, Club Wagon, and cabover pickup changed how the industry approached van design. Development began in 1957, and the lineup was created to replace the Ford F-Series panel delivery. The Econoline entered the market against the VW Transporter and the soon-to-arrive Chevrolet Corvair 95.
On paper, Ford seemed to be at a disadvantage. Both the Chevy and VW used rear-mounted, air-cooled engines. The Corvair had near 50/50 weight distribution and independent rear suspension. By comparison, the Econoline used a mid-mounted—really more front-mounted—engine, resulting in a 60/40 weight split. That made traction in rain or snow more challenging. But the Econoline had one major advantage: a low, flat rear floor. Anyone who has loaded a cargo van knows how valuable that is. This video takes a closer look at the first-generation Econoline and answers how much that low floor really mattered.
Vintage Ford commercial audio
A new shape, a new design, with a new name: Ford Econoline.
The Econoline pickup offered four main advantages: a lower price—up to $239 less than standard half-ton trucks—better fuel economy with up to 30 mpg in certified tests, lower weight thanks to 1,050 pounds less chassis mass, and more load space with a 7-foot box and up to 23% more capacity in a truck that was three feet shorter.
The Econoline van shared the same economy features and offered 204 cubic feet of cargo space, with access from the rear or curb side. Ford also offered the Econoline Station Bus, which cost less than most compact wagons and had twice the interior space of the biggest full-size wagons. It could convert to a cargo hauler quickly.
Released in September 1960 as a 1961 model, the Econoline came as a cargo van, passenger wagon, Deluxe Club Wagon, or cab-forward pickup. It used the Falcon platform with a unibody design, a solid rear axle, an I-beam front axle, and variable-rate leaf springs front and rear. Drum brakes were fitted all around, and the vans rolled on 6.5x14-inch bias-ply tires.
The design was simple. A flat front end held the windshield and headlamps with aluminum bezels. Lower on the body were the engine air inlet and wraparound turn signals. The doors sat fully forward, their lower edges arched to clear the front wheel openings. Cargo and passenger vans had barn doors on the passenger side. Passenger vans also had three side windows plus a fixed triangular window behind the front seats. Rear barn doors had fixed windows and round recessed tail lamps. The cabover pickup used rolled beltline edges to form the bed, with rounded cab corners and a fixed rear window. All corners of the Econoline were rounded, including the roofline.
Power came from either an 85-hp 144-ci inline-six or an optional 101-hp 170-ci inline-six, which produced 156 lb-ft of torque. Both engines paired with a three-speed manual shifted from the steering column.
Standard equipment was minimal: electric wipers, a rearview mirror, bumpers, turn signals, and padded dual front seats on vans and pickups. The Station Bus added a full-length headliner, interior trim panels, chrome latches, coat hooks, a dome light, carpeting, a driver’s visor, and wheel caps. The Deluxe Club Wagon included additional exterior trim, a nicer interior, and the larger 170-ci engine as standard. Options included a heater, sun visors, emergency flashers, inside mirror, dual horns, cigarette lighter, hubcaps, chrome bumpers, a dome light, and a radio.
Ford advertised the Econoline as 1,050 pounds lighter than the outgoing panel van but capable of hauling up to 1,650 pounds. The pickup had a 7-foot bed; the van carried 204 cubic feet of cargo; and the Station Wagon seated up to eight people. The shorter overall length made parking and tight-space maneuvering much easier. Ford also claimed up to 30 mpg in certified testing.
Buyers responded well. Ford sold 61,135 Econolines for 1961. The 1962 models carried over unchanged, and sales rose to 76,938.
The 1963 models received a fully synchronized three-speed transmission, optional driver-side barn doors, a retractable step, and larger 7x14-inch wheels and tires that increased GVW to 4,350 pounds. Sales continued climbing, reaching 88,053.
For 1964, Ford introduced a lower-priced panel van without side doors, and added a four-speed manual and Cruise-O-Matic automatic to the options list. The pickup gained optional quarter windows. The Deluxe Club Wagon added available camping gear such as a compact kitchen with a folding shelf, stove, table, and storage, or a folding mattress for two. Ford remained the segment sales leader, delivering 83,079 units.
In 1965, the four-speed manual was dropped, and Ford introduced a new 150-hp 240-ci inline-six. The 170-ci engine became standard. The Super Van debuted, adding 18 inches of cargo length—enough to load 4x8 sheets of plywood or drywall with the doors closed. Ford sold 76,867 Econolines for 1965.
The 1966 lineup saw no meaningful changes, but sales rose again to 84,180. The 1967 models also carried over as Ford prepared for a redesigned van. A UAW strike delayed the launch, and the new Econoline didn’t appear until January 1968. Ford sold 81,752 units during the extended 1967 model year, which became the last for the cabover pickup.
Returning to the question at the beginning: that low rear floor made a significant difference. It made loading easier front to back and allowed a forklift to place a 40x48-inch skid inside—something neither the VW van nor the Corvair 95 could do. The Corvair 95 ended production after 1965, with only 1,500 units sold that year.
Ford originally expected the pickup to outsell the van, but the opposite happened. Vans outsold pickups 9 to 1, leading to the pickup’s cancellation. Chevrolet and Dodge released similar cabover vans in 1964—noticeable similarities to the Econoline. The second-generation 1969 Econoline moved the engine even farther forward and offered a V8 for the first time, but that’s another topic entirely.
If you enjoyed the video, consider liking and subscribing. The channel now has more than 250 videos covering Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury. Thanks for watching.
Tony has been a member of the car culture since the late 1970s, acquiring his first car at the age of 13 in a straight-up swap for a Schwinn 10-speed bicycle. He has personally owned well over 500 cars and trucks since that first car. He was employed as a jet engine Mechanic by the US Air Force for over 10 years and served in theater during Desert Storm. He has always wrenched on his own vehicles. In the Fall of 2021 he launched his own YouTube channel that focuses on Ford Motor Company products, both old and new, however other manufacturers product will appear from time to time. New content and videos are posted every Saturday Morning at 11 AM EST
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Peeryog Everytime I see one I am reminded of the current Santa Fe. And vice versa.
- Original Guy I watched that Moscow parade thing. (With the Cyrillic captions because my Russian is a little rough.) I won't give the whole thing away, but it started off with a couple of dudes riding around in stupid useless convertibles, standing up like Hitler, who I'm pretty sure was an actual Nazi. They drove around in circles and kept stopping to ask if anyone had seen all the missing military equipment, and all the guys kept moaning back, that no, they hadn't, ask the next section of guys.They looked around for someone shorter and sicker-looking than Putin but they were unsuccessful so they let him speak.The North Korean military was there, I guess the invasion has begun. The North Korean guys were skinny but their rifles were nicely polished, I guess they have plenty of time on their hands between meals.Some of the Russian military guys carried little white flags, I assume they keep those handy in case they run across any U.S. Marines.
- Marc J Rauch EBFlexing on ur mom - Ethanol is compatible with more types of rubber, plastic, and metal than gasoline and aromatics. This means that ethanol is less corrosive. The bottom line is that long before ethanol could have any damaging effect on any engine component, gasoline and aromatics would have already damaged the components. And the addition of ethanol doesn't exacerbate the problems caused by gasoline and aromatics; it actually helps mitigate them.
- Original Guy Today I learned that a reverse brake bleeder (and a long borescope) can be helpful if you are autistic and don't have any friends and no one wants to work with you to bleed your brakes. Also it is quick, once you figure out the process.When Canada assembled my truck back in circa 1995, they apparently used a different clip to attach the brake pedal (and switch) to the brake booster than what is technically called for. It is tough to realize this when the spring steel clip flies off to who knows where. Of course I ordered the wrong clip trying to match the style that I saw buried up in the dash before it flew away. My truck now has the 'correct' clip, everyone can relax.I ordered some more brake fluid (DOT 3, nothing fancy) but it turns out I still have two fresh bottles (my shelves aren't empty, I just have too many shelves).Went to install my fancy new Optima YellowTop battery and it turns out I need a new side post terminal bolt. (Yet another order placed, bring on THE TARIFFS.) It would be a shame to strip out the threads on a nice new battery, no?Good news: The longer it takes me to get my truck started again, the more I save on fuel. 😁
- Normie Weekends here would be a great time for everyone to join in praise of dog dish hubcaps on body-color matched steelies!
Comments
Join the conversation
The early Econolines were marketed as Falcon Club Wagons from 1961 thru 1967. It wasn't until the totally redesigned 2nd generation for 1968 MY that the Falcon name was dropped it was just the Ford Econoline. The first generation was built on a Falcon platform. The second generation bumped the front out giving the driver and front passenger more legroom.
In the early 1970s, the first generation was still being used by Pacific Bell, one of the Baby Bells before the breakup of AT&T. I recall hearing a couple Pac-Bell installers complaining about the ’’speed wobble’’ (at 50 mph on the freeway) on the early 1960s models they were stuck with. The late 1960s second generation with the 302 and cruise-o-matic was preferred.
When I was doing parts deliveries for GE technicians in the late 1970s, it was in a 1973 Dodge Tradesman short wheelbase with a 318 and Torqueflite. A great freeway vehicle and bulletproof, even at 180k miles. I was tempted to buy one and convert it to a passenger vehicle, but then I would pay for the gas at 14 mpg, and gas in some places was almost a dollar!
Funny that Ford, GM, and Chrysler all used the cab-over for just one generation and then switched to longer wheelbases with the driver behind the front axle by the early 1970s. Apparently the Ford model - the VW Bus - wasn’t that good an idea.