Tax the Rich (Person's Car): Luxury Auto Dealers in One Canadian Province Aren't Happy About Their Customers Getting Soaked

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After hitting it big with the Fab Four, George Harrison wrote the scathing song Taxman in protest of the British government’s “Super Tax” on high-income earners. At the time, the boys faced a 95 percent tax on their earnings (“There’s one for you, nineteen for me”), and Harrison reportedly did everything he could to offshore his wealth.

Britain’s dismal weather wasn’t the only reason rock musicians fled the country during this period.

In beautiful British Columbia, a mountain- and wine-filled area north of Seattle, the provincial government’s recent budget has some auto dealers steaming mad and worried their customers will hit the road in search of deal. The province’s New Democratic Party government, elected last year, plans to levy a 25 percent tax on the purchase of very high-end vehicles, with lesser models facing a 20-percent markup. However, many dealers wonder where the law of diminishing returns comes into play.

To those unfamiliar with Canadian politics, the NDP is the equivalent of Bernie Sanders. Tax increases and boosted social spending is the party’s bread and butter. In this case, the government claims the extra revenue will go towards increased spending on child care and affordable housing — a popular platform in Vancouver, a city where home prices make San Francisco look low-rent.

The vehicle surtax breaks down like this: models retailing for $125,000 to $149,999 see the provincial sales tax (PST) rise from 10 to 15 percent on April 1st. Cars costing $150,00 or more will see that surcharge rise to 20 percent. Coupled with the 5 percent federal goods and services tax (GST) applied to all things, that means a 20 or 25 percent tax on big-ticket vehicles.

Private sales are also subject to the new PST ceiling.

“My phone has not stopped ringing,” Blair Qualey told CBC. Qualey, president and CEO of the New Car Dealers Association of B.C., said, “Our members who sell in the market are gravely concerned.”

Some 400 dealers and 36,000 employees fall under the association’s purview. While it’s hard to argue against many government-funded social initiatives, dealers don’t see the new taxes panning out. B.C. isn’t a captive market, and its neighboring province, Alberta, only levies a 5 percent tax on vehicle purchases. Sure, Vancouver is overflowing with wealthy people, but having to pay $75,000 in tax on top of the MSRP of a Ferrari or Bentley is no small thing.

Sales of luxury vehicles rose 9 percent in B.C. last year, making up roughly a third of the province’s auto sales. Obviously, a ripe target for lawmakers armed with calculators.

“The automotive sector is incredibly competitive. Where a consumer can go to another jurisdiction to save money, they will,” Qualey said.

At one Vancouver Ferrari-Maserati dealer, general manager Mark Edmonds said he expects would-be buyers will consult their wallets before buying a new vehicle locally.

“It’s a psychological thing for people. [25 percent] is a big number,” he told CBC. “Maybe now they’ll buy a boat instead of a car, or maybe a vacation property. … Then the province will lose out on the sale completely.”

Depending on who you ask, the taxes are either too steep or not high enough. Dealers admit it will be hard for the public to feel sympathetic to the luxury car buyer’s plight — a six-figure car is no one’s idea of a necessity of life. One factor not helping the sympathy is the province’s troubled auto insurer (British Columbians get their coverage from the government) and its projected 1.8 billion-dollar loss this fiscal year.

As more and more British Columbians snap up mega-buck vehicles, the insurer faces an ever-higher number of claims not covered by the owner’s premiums. The province’s budget has to cover any shortfall. If it means avoiding a rate increase, many B.C.ers will sleep just fine knowing well-off drivers are being turned upside down and shaken at the dealer.

That could change if the government doesn’t get the haul it expected.

[Image: Bentley]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 130 comments
  • Pbx Pbx on Feb 26, 2018

    Time for a bit of levity? Singapore students come to Vancouver for various educational reasons. They ask the parents for money for a car. The parents, being unaware of car costs in Canada say OK but nothing more expensive than a Corolla, or similar. The kids agree. The parents send the money, the kids go out and buy a Nissan GT-R or similar. The price of a Corolla, after taxes, in Singapore is $125K USD.

    • Onyxtape Onyxtape on Feb 26, 2018

      I know a guy living in Hong Kong working as a CFO for a multi-national. He drives an ES300 because it's already quite expensive.

  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Feb 27, 2018

    Some who frequent this site will be delighted to know this luxury car tax has ensnared Tesla.

    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Feb 27, 2018

      Brodozers for everyone. 100k before taxes gets you an F450 ;)

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next