Rare Rides Icons: The Jeep Wagoneer, The First Luxury SUV Ever (Part XI)
We last left the Jeep Wagoneer at a branching point in 1984, where the SJ Wagoneer Limited was rebranded as the Grand Wagoneer, and the new XJ Cherokee donned some fancy trim and became the base trim Wagoneer and upmarket Wagoneer Limited. AMC’s desired outcome was for the XJ Cherokee to replace the SJ in all ways, and send the old Wagoneer off into the sunset. While that strategy worked for the Cherokee models, buyers were not keen on the expensive and compact XJ Wagoneer. Sales of the new Wagoneer never hit 25,000 in a year and dropped off quickly. Meanwhile, AMC was forced to continue selling the old and outdated but profitable Grand Wagoneer.
As mentioned previously, at the launch of the XJ Wagoneer the SJ lineup was consolidated from two trims into one. The base model Brougham was discontinued, and the Wagoneer Limited was renamed Grand Wagoneer.
Midway through 1984 the single-model lineup was interrupted when Jeep introduced a Wagoneer Custom, a short-lived and odd experiment. The Custom trim was last used in 1983 and was sold at that time as Custom Wagoneer. But this time the Custom was even more basic. It went without wood trim on the exterior, and used steelies with wheel covers.
There was much less standard equipment than the Grand Wagoneer, and it had part-time four-wheel drive instead of Selec-Trac. The Custom was priced at $15,995 ($51,832 adj.) in 1984, roughly $3,000 ($9,721 adj.) less costly than the luxurious Grand Wagoneer. Very few customers were interested in a bare bones Wagoneer Custom, and the trim was dropped after only a few months.
Incredibly rare, the Wagoneer Custom stood out as a visual oddity. Though it wore the updated Wagoneer fascia, it lacked any wood or script badging. With the base wheel covers, the bare bones look revealed the elderly lines underneath. There was a black trim strip down the side — an attempt to hide the very plain looking '60s sheet metal.
The interior wore less fancy trim as well, particularly where door panels were concerned. Reverting to an earlier style, the door panels lacked much padding or any carpet. The door panel design was simpler, and wore a large cloth panel insert.
Windows and seats were all manually operated. The seats themselves were of a more basic design than on Grand Wagoneer, with less padding. They also used cloth upholstery (houndstooth here) instead of leather.
After the half-year venture into the basic Custom trim, it was dropped and the Grand Wagoneer soldiered on alone in 1985. There were updates that year on the handling front, with edits to the sway bar at the front end. Shock absorbers were redesigned as well, and there were revised springs at the rear.
In 1986, the SJ Grand Wagoneer’s final visual refresh occurred, and the front clip was revised again. The grille that tiered outward was replaced with a flat horizontal design, with three rectangular horizontal sections of chrome. Inside them were thin horizontal slats. The top of the grille trim was also revised at the hood bulge, and gained some black inset detailing and a fluted design. Befitting its status as a luxury product, a Jeep hood ornament also arrived this year.
There were changes inside too, and the interior was revised to a great extent. The dash top was new, and so were the gauges. The previously round gauges from inception in 1963 were replaced with square ones. Seats were covered in a new leather style, and there were corduroy cloth inserts available. The headrests were separate from the seatback and were adjustable for the first time.
Door panels were revised, and carpet wasn’t quite as plush as in 1985. The old four-spoke steering wheel was replaced with a two-spoke one from the Cherokee. The climate control was new, and finally meant the AC switch was located in the same area as the rest of the climate control and not on a separate section of the dash. The dash layout looked more cohesive as the metal glovebox lid original to the SJ was replaced with a plastic one that wore the same woodtone as the rest of the interior.
Among the other improvements was an update to the drivetrain. Selec-Trac was updated with a new limited-slip differential called Trac-Lok. It sent power to the wheel with the most traction in any driving situation.
Change was once again in the wind for Jeep in 1987, its last year of ownership by AMC. The Wagoneer had its 25th anniversary and was updated again, though there was no special commemorative edition. New Michelin tires were made standard, and the stereo was upgraded again to include AM/FM with electronic tuning, cassette player, and a total of four(!) interior speakers by Jensen.
From 1987 onward there was a new look to the exterior wood paneling, which was now called “marine teak.” Badge scripts were revised on the exterior, too. Inside there were slightly different interior colors: tan and cordovan. They replaced the previous colors that were vaguely different, and called honey and garnet. The strap-style interior door pulls were removed, leaving only one grab spot within the arm rest.
By the end of ‘87 AMC and Jeep were under new ownership by Chrysler. Chrysler spent big bucks assuming the debt and assets of AMC, which was well under water by that time. The company had an aging and limited fleet of AMC-sourced vehicles, and Renault products that had proved unsuccessful on the U.S. market.
AMC and Renault were also saddled with a lot of debt, partly due to the costly development of the Eagle Premier, at $260 million ($800m adj.). It was a technically advanced sedan that required its own brand new factory. Renault wanted out, and Lee Iacocca wanted Jeep very badly.
Bad enough that Chrysler assumed a shocking $767 million ($2,277,638,228 adj.) of AMC’s debt in 1987. Once the transaction was made, Chrysler assumed Jeep product development and surprisingly made some more investment into the SJ Wagoneer. We’ll pick up there next time.
[Images: Jeep, YouTube, seller, seller]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.
More by Corey Lewis
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
- Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Comments
Join the conversation
See that sidewall to wheel rim ratio? That's righteous, copacetic, meet and just, absolutely dandy.
But my peasant soul blanches at soft leather seats, light-tone carpeting and puffy, complex door panels enfeebling such a capable vehicle.
That door panel is the lesser one? Man these things were nice in their time.