Trump Weakens Fuel Economy Regulations

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

President Donald Trump is set to weaken fuel economy regulations for cars and light trucks.


The Trump administration says such a move would save Americans $109 billion over five years and take $1,000 off of the cost of a new car.

This is the second move to undo the Biden administration's moves toward reducing emissions and greenhouse gasses. Biden had been encouraging a shift to electric cars. The Trump administration already killed the $7,500 federal tax credit offered to EV buyers.

This move isn't just about undoing what Biden did, or attempted to do. The federal government has, for fifty years and across Republican and Democratic administrations, worked to encourage reduced fuel consumption by tightening standards -- the idea being that tighter standards would lead to higher miles per gallon, and thus slower fuel consumption.

Tighter fuel-economy standards have lead automakers to find ways to build internal-combustion engines that maximize fuel economy, and have also helped drive automakers to build hybrids and electric vehicles.

From the New York Times:

The plan announced on Wednesday would require automakers to achieve an average of 34.5 miles per gallon for cars and light trucks in model year 2031, down from the standard of 50.4 miles per gallon set by the Biden administration.

The Times reports that automakers are publicly praising the move but privately are upset that Trump is making these changes after they invested years and billions of dollars in EVs and EV batteries. Not only that, but Trump's tariffs on steel and imported auto parts are raising their costs and negatively affecting their supply chains -- and inflation is making it harder for the average consumer to even buy a new car.

The Biden admin rules, which were finalized in June 2024, were based on the assumption that automakers would sell more EVs, since EVs don't burn gas at all. That would obviously boost fuel-economy averages across a brand, even factoring in the continued sale of ICE and hybrid vehicles.

From the Times:

Biden administration officials estimated that the rule would lower fuel costs by $23 billion while preventing more than 710 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere by 2050, the equivalent of taking 165 million cars off the roads for one year.

It's likely that these changes will lead to increased sales of trucks and SUVs, which tend to be more profitable to automakers -- and also tend to have fewer MPGs. Many automakers have already moved away from cars and towards SUVs -- more than a few product portfolios lack any inexpensive and fuel-saving compact-car offerings.

That could cause automakers a problem should the price of oil jump unexpectedly. Indeed, that was an issue for certain automakers during The Great Recession in 2007 and 2008.

These changes put the U.S. on a different path from the rest of the world. Other parts of the globe are seeing increased sales of electric vehicles, and if the EV market is growing in other parts of the globe but shrinking or stagnating here, that could make it a bit harder to design cars for global markets. Not impossible, of course, and consumer behavior will play as much a part as regulations, but it will be tougher.

Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, or CAFE, have been around since 1975. They came into being as a result of the oil shortages of the 1970s and remained relatively stagnant until the Obama administration, in which Biden served as vice president, sought to tighten them.

The Times says that most economists it polled suggest that Trump's proposed changes will reduce production costs, but only marginally, and there will be costs to public health and the environment. Those economists also say that over time, Americans will pay more in gas prices.

There is now a 45-day public comment period on the proposed changes -- with finalization happening some time in 2026.

[Image: K-FK/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 137 comments
  • Stellantis Guy Stellantis Guy on Dec 08, 2025

    Related. Apparently all the engine failures aren't due to one thing, they are due to all the things combined (tougher for anyone to anticipate). Also it isn't the big debris that is the problem, it is the microscopic stuff (much more difficult to deal with).


  • Stellantis Guy Stellantis Guy on Dec 11, 2025

    TG I don't think anyone has picked up on that plot twist you are rambling on about.

    • Stellantis Guy Stellantis Guy on Dec 12, 2025

      Well I have to believe that they might care a great deal, if they only realized...


  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next