Trump Pulls Out Of Climate Agreement

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

The administration of President Donald Trump has pulled out of an international agreement that is meant to combat climate change.

This agreement has been in place for 34 years, and all of the other countries in the world are members of the treaty.


President Trump posted on social media that he signed a presidential memorandum that would pull the United States out of the agreement -- formally called the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change -- along with 65 other pacts and international organizations. Around half are U.N. organizations.

Trump claimed that these treaties and international organizations "no longer serve American interests."

From a statement by Secretary of State Marco Rubio:

“As this list begins to demonstrate, what started as a pragmatic framework of international organizations for peace and cooperation has morphed into a sprawling architecture of global governance, often dominated by progressive ideology and detached from national interests.”

The climate treaty was created in 1992 and formed the legal basis for the Paris Agreement, which is a voluntary pact among countries to keep global temperatures below certain levels. Trump has already pulled the U.S. out of the Paris agreement, with that becoming official later this month on January 20th.

Additionally, Trump is pulling the U.S. out of several other climate agreements. From The New York Times:

The administration said it was also pulling the United States from the top United Nations climate science body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as well as a host of other major international environmental organizations. They include the International Renewable Energy Association, which represents global clean energy interests, the International Solar Alliance and the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

The Times points out that this move comes as rival China is working to be in a dominant position when it comes to clean-energy tech. Meanwhile, American allies like Australia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also working to reduce emissions from greenhouse gasses while simultaneously attempting to improve renewable-energy technology.

It will take about a year for the withdrawal to become official after the U.S. files a formal withdrawal notice with the U.N. Once it's in effect, the U.S. will have to sit out annual negotiations taking place between 200 nations -- negotiations that aim to cut the amount greenhouse gas expelled into the atmosphere.

It's unclear how, if all, this move will affect the automotive industry -- Trump has already rolled back fuel-economy regs. What is clear is that for whatever reason -- an attempt to please the oil lobby, ignorance, or a rejection of wind energy because windmills change the view from golf courses he owns -- Trump and his administration are going to ignore scientific consensus about the dangers of climate change, as well as evidence-based policies that could lead to a cleaner planet.

Even the New York Times, which tends to avoid editorializing in news articles, didn't mince words:

The moves cement the United States’ isolation from the rest of the world when it comes to fighting climate change.
The decision is not only an indicator of America’s rejection from global diplomacy, it’s a finger in the eye to the billions of people, including Americans, suffering through intensifying wildfires, storms and droughts, threats to the food supply and to biodiversity, and other dangerous and costly effects of a warming planet.

Taking off my reporter hat and putting on my pundit hat, I tend to agree with Times. A cleaner atmosphere is better for all of us, and as is the case with the fuel-economy regulation decision, Trump is moving us backwards. I say this not as a liberal or anti-Trumper, but someone who likes to breathe easy -- a desire that should be bipartisan.

We'll be monitoring this development to see how it affects the automotive industry.

[Image: mark reinstein/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 321 comments
  • Peeryog Everytime I see one I am reminded of the current Santa Fe. And vice versa.
  • Original Guy I watched that Moscow parade thing. (With the Cyrillic captions because my Russian is a little rough.) I won't give the whole thing away, but it started off with a couple of dudes riding around in stupid useless convertibles, standing up like Hitler, who I'm pretty sure was an actual Nazi. They drove around in circles and kept stopping to ask if anyone had seen all the missing military equipment, and all the guys kept moaning back, that no, they hadn't, ask the next section of guys.They looked around for someone shorter and sicker-looking than Putin but they were unsuccessful so they let him speak.The North Korean military was there, I guess the invasion has begun. The North Korean guys were skinny but their rifles were nicely polished, I guess they have plenty of time on their hands between meals.Some of the Russian military guys carried little white flags, I assume they keep those handy in case they run across any U.S. Marines.
  • Marc J Rauch EBFlexing on ur mom - Ethanol is compatible with more types of rubber, plastic, and metal than gasoline and aromatics. This means that ethanol is less corrosive. The bottom line is that long before ethanol could have any damaging effect on any engine component, gasoline and aromatics would have already damaged the components. And the addition of ethanol doesn't exacerbate the problems caused by gasoline and aromatics; it actually helps mitigate them.
  • Original Guy Today I learned that a reverse brake bleeder (and a long borescope) can be helpful if you are autistic and don't have any friends and no one wants to work with you to bleed your brakes. Also it is quick, once you figure out the process.When Canada assembled my truck back in circa 1995, they apparently used a different clip to attach the brake pedal (and switch) to the brake booster than what is technically called for. It is tough to realize this when the spring steel clip flies off to who knows where. Of course I ordered the wrong clip trying to match the style that I saw buried up in the dash before it flew away. My truck now has the 'correct' clip, everyone can relax.I ordered some more brake fluid (DOT 3, nothing fancy) but it turns out I still have two fresh bottles (my shelves aren't empty, I just have too many shelves).Went to install my fancy new Optima YellowTop battery and it turns out I need a new side post terminal bolt. (Yet another order placed, bring on THE TARIFFS.) It would be a shame to strip out the threads on a nice new battery, no?Good news: The longer it takes me to get my truck started again, the more I save on fuel. 😁
  • Normie Weekends here would be a great time for everyone to join in praise of dog dish hubcaps on body-color matched steelies!
Next