Dodge May Deliver Hi-Po SRT Hurricane Motors

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While many are excited that Stellantis has resumed production of the 5.7-liter Hemi V8, it sounds as though the company has no plans to abandon development of the 3.0-liter Hurricane I6.


With the exception of the electrified variants, that are seeing their production being heavily scaled back, the Dodge Charger is presently available with Hurricane motors featuring either 420 horsepower and 468 lb-ft of torque (R/T model) or 550 hp and 531 lb-ft of torque (Scat Pack). But it sounds as though even spicier variants are in the works.

News comes by way of The Drive, which recently discussed the future of the Dodge Charger with the people responsible. Formerly synonymous with the Hemi motors, author Andrew Collins asked what might be next for the model.


“We’ve got a lot in the works for SRT, that’s for sure,” responded Matt McAlear, Dodge CEO and head of Chrysler and Alfa Romeo North America. “The SRT’s gonna continue to be the biggest, baddest, boldest, best thing we do, and it’ll be fun.”

That’s a pretty clear admission that hi-po SRT models are forthcoming — and likely not just for the Charger. But he dropped some hints that the performance donation might not necessarily be limited to the returning V8 motors.


“V8’s not a bad word, but performance is performance,” McAlear noted. “We’re gonna continue to push the limits of this engine [the Hurricane I6] and see what it can do.”


This reportedly included mentions that the SRT division was already working on performance upgrades for the Hurricane, with the CEO adding that the twin turbos provided a lot of tuning potential.

That’s certainly true. But fans have still been clamoring to see the V8 return to what many previously viewed as the last true American muscle car ever since the current-generation Charger was revealed.


In terms of performance, it doesn’t really matter how the cylinders are oriented. I’ve driven Hemi and Hurricane-equipped pickups, with the only glaring difference being the sound. While the 3.0-liter I6 sounds nice, the turbos mute the soundtrack a little and most Americans just feel more secure with the rumble of a V8.

Obviously, there are other differences. The 5.7-liter V8 does offer a tad more towing capacity than the Hurricane-equipped trucks. Some would likewise prefer the mechanical simplicity of the older V8 relative to the twin-turbo Hurricane. But this might not matter to quite so many people on something like an extra-spicy Dodge Charger.


It may also be supremely difficult to install the Hemi into that particular model. The current Charger was originally developed as an EV with the ability to field the 3.0-liter twin turbo. While there’s likely enough room to cram the Hemi into the engine bay, the cost of developing such a vehicle could prove prohibitively expensive.

Stellantis may not be in a huge rush to design such a car just because U.S. emission regulations have suddenly eased up and customers claim to want one.


The current gasoline-powered Dodge Charger also weighs quite a bit more than the older models due to the addition of an all-wheel drive system and structural changes designed to accommodate battery packs for the EV variant. Considering that the Hemi V8s are likewise heavier than the Hurricane motors, Stellantis may be hesitant to put more weight over the front axle.

Dodge has even tuned the new car’s exhaust to have a deep rumble, rather than the trumpety note that I6 motors are typically known for. R/T models are also a bit faster than the predecessors on paper. It’s very clear that the company is keen to deliver what customers have said they wanted, even if a V8 option is still off the table.


Will some people still be waiting until Dodge installs a V8 and dumps the touchscreen-focused interior before they’re ready to buy? Almost certainly. But their ranks may be smaller than we think and could even come down a bit further after we see what the — presumably forthcoming — SRT-tuned version of the 3.0-liter Hurricane has to offer.

[Images: Stellantis]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Rog168939691 Rog168939691 on Mar 12, 2026

    It depends an the frequency and weight of your right foot and your driving ability.

  • D D on Mar 13, 2026

    Turbo and super chargers alone do NOT increase gas mileage, in fact they can decrease mileage because all they do is pump more air, which allows for increased power from..... burning more gasoline. The weight savings from going from a larger engine to a smaller/lighter engine is what increases miles per gallon, but only when you are not accelerating hard and using the turbo. T/S charging allows that tiny engine to burn more gas and air with every stroke, increasing power to that of a larger engine, at the cost of over stressing it.


    In a diesel truck T/S charging makes sense. A diesel engine must already withstand high compression and is built with far more strength than any gas engine has to be engineered for. And when you try to convert a gas engine to diesel its going to be a fail, for the same reasons.

  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next