Stellantis Pledges to Build More Cars in the U.S.
In response to President Donald Trump's proposed 25 percent tariffs on products built in Canada and Mexico, Stellantis is promising to build more cars in the United States of America.
From Reuters:
"We share the President's objective to build more American cars and create lasting American jobs. We look forward to working with him and his team," Stellantis said in a statement.
Volvo has also suggested it might move some production to the States.
Right now, according to Reuters, Stellantis imports about 40 percent of the vehicles it sells from Canada and Mexico. The company has facilities in all three countries.
Here's the thing, though -- it's difficult for automakers to shift production plans quickly. Future production plans start years in advance -- it takes about three to five years for an OEM to design and test a new model or the next generation of an existing model. Not only that, but even if a car is built in the U.S., parts and components may be sourced from other countries. So a cynic might suggest that Stellantis is playing nice publicly with the president while trying to figure out how to best adjust to tariffs.
Again, from Reuters:
"The short-term problem for the automotive industry is that supply chains cannot be relocated domestically or new plants cannot be built in a month," said Commerzbank economists Bernd Weidensteiner and Christoph Balz in a note. "It's therefore foreseeable that the pain in the automotive industry will increase significantly in the coming months when many important preliminary products become more expensive. Consumers face the threat of significantly higher prices."
For example, there are reports that Honda might shift production of the next Civic Hybrid from Mexico to Indiana. But if that happens -- and Honda wouldn't confirm it -- it wouldn't happen until 2028. That obviously means that if Trump enacts the tariffs that are currently on pause, it would take three years for Honda to adjust production of that model. And Trump would be nearing the end of his second and final term as president -- his successor might not continue the tariffs.
This is why I'd hate to be involved in any sort of OEM product planning right now.
Back to Stellantis -- 25 percent tariffs could cost the company $17.5 billion this year.
We'll see what happens. As noted, the tariffs are on a one-month pause for automakers. I have a feeling the "T" word will be a part of our coverage on a near-daily basis for a while.
[Images: Stellantis, Honda]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
@ Mikey - No, not at all, and recommends taking the time to point out to Harley-Davidson owners that the charging system, suspension, instrumentation on the agricultural implements they bomb around are foreign sourced.
So Stellantis is planning to produce more autos domestically that are over-priced and don't sell. Good plan.