Michigan Dealership In Legal Battle Over What Defines A New Car

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

A car dealership has had its license suspended by the Michigan Department of State over a legal disagreement on what technically constitutes a new vehicle.


LaFontaine Chevrolet Buick GMC of St. Clair, Inc. has allegedly violated probationary measures imposed by the state by way of selling automobiles previously used as loaner cars. While that’s not illegal, registering them as new models violates the Michigan Vehicle Code. However, the dealership is arguing that this shouldn’t be the case — and likely wouldn’t be if the business was based in another state.


While you’ll never convince me that a car with more than a dozen miles on the odometer could ever be a brand-new automobile, this is standard practice for plenty of dealers. That’s why you’ll sometimes see discontinued models granting a handful of sales years later. They’re often vehicles that were used as a loaner by the dealership. But, since they were never officially sold to a customer and registered, they can technically qualify as new.


The business is making the argument that rental or service loaner programs should be considered as such, noting that statutes in other states “reflect this reality.” It’s making the claim that Michigan’s titling laws are outdated, even though they should technically meet all qualifications for the relevant incentives and warranties provided to new vehicles.


“LaFontaine Automotive Group has always operated in full compliance with automaker programs and remains dedicated to maintaining complete alignment with state regulations,” LaFontaine Automotive Group was quoted as stating by MLive. “Unfortunately, a long-standing disconnect between automaker program definitions and state titling requirements has created widespread confusion among dealers across Michigan.”


While the Michigan Department of State (MDOS) announced its decision on Tuesday, LaFontaine has been under the microscope for quite some time. According to the MDOS, the state originally believed it had discovered an illegal sales scheme during a general compliance inspection conducted in September of 2024.

From MLive:


In December 2024, MDOS imposed an alternative penalty agreement for the dealer that included a $3,000 financial penalty and 18-month probation period, according to the release.
Also, dealership staff members attended an MDOS training session about violations of the Michigan Vehicle Code.
During a follow-up in Sept. 2025, MDOS regulatory staff found more than 24 instances of the dealership continuing to sell used vehicles as new, according to the release. One of the “new” vehicles had 6,000 miles, according to the release.


With the dealership’s license now suspended, it’s prohibited from selling automobiles.


“Upon notification of the temporary suspension, LaFontaine immediately began working closely with state officials to review internal processes, correct documentation, and ensure full compliance moving forward,” wrote the dealership. “As a family-owned organization, LaFontaine Automotive Group takes great pride in its long-standing reputation for honesty, integrity, and guest satisfaction. We remain deeply committed to maintaining the trust of our valued guests and the communities we serve while working diligently with the State of Michigan toward a swift and fair resolution.”


On the one hand, selling a car with over 6,000 miles on the clock as “new” seems insane. But we don’t have the details of that transaction. If it was simply a clerical error and the vehicle sold to a customer paying a fraction of the original MSRP, then this less of a scandal than it first appears. LaFontaine is also correct in noting that plenty of other states wouldn’t have taken issue with the aforementioned transactions.


We don’t know exactly how the deals took place. Was the dealership selling these cars to people who had no idea what an odometer was or is this legal conflict a bit more nuanced than it first appears?


The dealer group has mixed reviews online. Individuals have also taken to forums (e.g. Reddit) to badmouth several of LaFontaine’s showrooms. However, that’s hardly abnormal and I don’t know many people that have had a stellar experience at any non-premium dealership. My personal experience has similarly resulted in catching most automotive sales representatives being dishonest — either intentionally or because they simply didn’t want to appear ill-informed on the product in question. But that doesn’t mean they’re intentionally breaking the law.


Interestingly, the reviews for the GM-focused showroom that’s taking all the heat in St. Clair actually has some of the best user reviews you’re likely to come across. While that could be a matter of paying for positive feedback, something loads of businesses do on a regular basis, one wonders why the St. Clair site did so much better than LaFontaine’s other Michigan storefronts.


The company has said it’s going to urge the state to modernize the laws while seeking support from OEMs and other dealerships. That $3,000 fine isn’t likely to ruin the showroom but being placed under an extended probation while being disallowed to conduct business is a more-serious issue.


[Images: Gretchen Gunda Enger/Shutterstock; RYO Alexandre/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Since adding automotive writing to his repertoire, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, discussed the status of the automotive sector on national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone should ever have to. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. Alleged to be contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 72 comments
  • Forward Observer The last time I had a door off my truck I hung it from my Little Giant ladder. But I was only replacing the hinge pins.I'm sorry if this sounds smarmy or smug, I am working on my people skills. (My therapist says I have a long way to go to catch up with some of you.) Would smarmy and smug come in handy if I worked for an automotive dealership? (I wonder.)
  • Arthur Dailey Auto 'journalists' should stop referencing the average new car purchase price and instead report on the mean price. We all understand that the glue of luxury vehicles and full size pickups inflate the average price.For me, 'affordable' hovers around the $35k mark.Under current N.A. standards, hatchbacks, stations wagons and non-luxury coupes are basically a lost cause.Personally I would like to see Canada convert to accepting vehicles that have passed the European standards, rather than adhering only to N.A. standards. That would allow for the importation of vehicles such as Dacias, Skodas, and yes more Fiats. Also some models for Japanese and Korean manufacturers that currently are not sold in North America. It may even help Mitsubishi in the Canadian market and allow for the return of Suzuki. Having more small, affordable vehicles available is not a bad thing.
  • The original ToolGuy™ Doubt we will see any new vehicle in the low 20s unless it is an EV and Chinese but wouldn't count on that happening. Not against more affordable vehicles but don't foresee that happening in the immediate future.Jeffs do you do any research before making ignorant comments? We have brand new vehicles sold today in the low 20s including the Hyundai Venue that starts at $20,550.
  • KwikShiftPro4X That ship has sailed. The new overvalued cheap/base car will be $30G.
  • The original ToolGuy™ We have inexpensive cars already
Next