Lamborghini Cancels EV Development

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Lamborghini’s CEO has confirmed that the company will not be building the Lanzador EV and has basically sworn off the concept of all-electric vehicles. Instead, the Italian brand stated that it’ll be prioritizing hybrid models to deliver both performance and emissions compliance.


The Lanzador, which was previewed in 2023 and delayed in 2024, won’t be scrapped entirely. CEO Stephan Winkelmann has simply confirmed that it won’t be an all-electric model — nor will any Lamborghini product for the foreseeable future.


According to The Sunday Times, Winkelmann suggested that continued development of EVs was running the risk of becoming “an expensive hobby” for the automaker. Considering how much of a money pit all-electric vehicles have become for some other brands, this is a legitimate concern.


While some automakers have had good luck with EVs, many others have poured the brunt of their development dollars into projects that haven’t yielded successful models. This not only created duds that weren’t selling, it also detracted from the development of other non-electric models that might have sold better.


One would think that this shouldn’t matter for a company like Lamborghini, however. All-electric hypercars already exist and have the capability to yield unparalleled levels of acceleration. Considering that the average Lambo customer can likewise afford to install high-capacity chargers in their garage, and undoubtedly has more practical vehicles on standby, an EV should make some amount of sense.


But Lamborghini trades largely on aesthetics and emotion. The cars need to be showy and interesting, while also offering excellent performance and enough usability to be taken out for the weekend. These are things that can be accomplished without a massive battery pack. EVs also frequently lack the same emotional appeal of something with an exhaust port, which is another big risk for a company like Lamborghini.

Hybrids split the difference and will allegedly represent the brand’s future, making it possible for the brand to keep combustion engines for “as long as possible.”


From The Sunday Times:


Winkelmann told The Sunday Times that the “acceptance curve” for battery-powered cars in Lamborghini’s target market was flattening and “close to zero”.
The company’s customers, he said, valued the “emotional experience” of their Lamborghinis — whether design, raw performance or, crucially, the distinctive sound and feedback of the internal combustion engine.
“EVs, in their current form, struggle to deliver this specific emotional connection,” he explained, confirming that noise — or lack of it, remains a crucial selling point in the luxury car market.


So the Lanzador will become a hybrid model, presumably in a similar vein to the likewise hybridized Porsche 918 Spyder, Ferrari LaFerrari, and McLaren P1. Those models successfully managed to showcase how far automakers could push hybrid powertrains in terms of adding performance. However, some of them do retain a few efficiency features in an attempt to drive home some lesson about sustainability.


It’s largely meaningless. For example, the McLaren P1 boasts an “e-Mode” that allows it to be driven extremely slowly on battery power alone. The feature isn’t particularly useful and the car remains a wildly expensive and impractical bauble for extremely rich households producing a larger environmental impact in a single weekend than you do all year. But this lets the manufacturer claim that “sustainability” is at the heart of the beast while improving its fuel economy beyond would never have been possible without a hybrid system.


Automakers have to comply with modern emissions regulations somehow and supercar brands have learned that hybrids can be a big help while boosting performance in the process. While purely eclectic vehicles could also do this, a lack of interest in EVs has made them a liability for numerous brands.


Like many companies, Lamborghini has been in the process of abandoning previous plans to pivot its lineup exclusively to battery only automobiles by 2029. Instead, the company now believes it can position its entire lineup to be hybrid models by 2030.


“The decision was made after over a year of continuous internal discussion, engaging with customers, dealers, market analysis and global data,” Winkelmann explained.

“Investing heavily in full-EV development when the market and customer base are not ready would be an expensive hobby, and financially irresponsible towards shareholders, customers [and] to our employees and their families,” he added.”


“Plug-in hybrids offer the best of both worlds, combining the agility and low-rev boost of electric battery technology with the emotion and power output of an internal combustion engine.”


Officially, Lamborghini has not ruled out building all-electric models further down the line. However, with so many automakers already reneging on past promises of all-electric lineups, statements like that aren’t particularly valuable. But that doesn’t mean the Italian company is making a mistake.


Winkelmann framed the decision as being purely financial. Running with EVs simply represented too great a risk for the continued wellbeing of the brand. But he also noted that emissions regulations, especially those in Europe, are becoming so stringent that it’s becoming difficult to plot out future development.


Shifting toward EVs was supposed to be a way to futureproof the brand as economy standards increased and many markets were plotting to ban everything other than purely electric vehicles. However, customers have not signaled they’re interested in buying them — creating a major rift between what regulators want and what people will actually purchase.


Lamborghini’s own market research suggested that customers wouldn’t have even bought the all-electric version of the Urus SUV it was planning, so its development was likewise cancelled before the car was ready for market.


“We couldn’t risk [a Urus EV]. The supercars are a very tiny segment,” Winkelmann noted. “Even if the margins of the supercars are higher than on Urus, it’s clear the Urus segment is bigger and more stable.”

[Images: Lamborghini]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 19 comments
  • Big Oil Big Oil on Feb 24, 2026

    We all know that automakers are sheep, and they all follow the sales leader: Lamborghini. This move alone will take literal dozens of EVs off the road. Great news!

  • Normie Normie on Feb 24, 2026

    EVs and gender reassignment will become sad memories like thalidomide.

    Then they'll come back again.

  • Andarris Here in the Toronto area I haven't seen a 2006-2012 with intact rocker pannels for over two years now. I presume everywhere around the Great Lakes is the same ? They were super cheap dhring the first two years of the pandemic - could get one with less than 85K for around $6500 certified or a little higher mileage for $5000. Glad I skipped it, even in 2021 some of the 10's &11's were displaying corosion like you'd see on a 7 year older Impala, Camry or Accord. Also the mid-model switch to EPS made me balk at the few clean ones I found.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I do not ever have delays. I only fly out of PDX or EUG to LAS or OAK and OGG then back .. have never been delayed in the last ?30-ish? trips to vegas/disneyland/maui/cruise ship vacations.... EUG has contract tsa so we never have any TSA delays. unsure which airports have PRIVATE contract TSA that is UNAFFECTED by the deadlock that i HOPE NEVER EVER END.
  • Big Al from Oz gidday mites how are yall feelin today? Want to have a barbie? We are right here gettin dee fire ready
  • Michael S6 The 3 Amigos better hope that the oil spike is short lived as 4-5 dollar a gallon gas would put a damper on their cash cows especially "Ford's strategic shift" of killing off the escape/Lincoln cousin. Most other automakers have a full line of vehicles with much better full economy. GM is sucking air and its Cadillac devision is mostly EV and geriatric line up of ICE cars and SUV's that were supposed to be phased out this year. The expensive gas may push shoppers toward EV but GM's horrible EV reliability is a barrier.
  • Tane94 I read the GM press release about first quarter sales 2026 vs 2025 and Buick is getting its butt kicked:Buick Total* 41,654 61,822 -32.6 The future is bleak for Buick.
Next