Rare Rides Icons: The Jeep Wagoneer, the First Luxury SUV Ever (Part II)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We return to the Jeep Wagoneer (here’s Part I) this week for a dive into its chassis, running gear, and other particulars. From the get-go the Wagoneer was designed with families in mind: It was slightly smaller than competition from Suburban and Travelall, lower to the ground, easier to get in and out of, and better equipped as standard. Jeep built the Wagoneer as an advancement of its Station Wagon product from the Forties, but was a clean sheet design with some very innovative thinking behind it.


As mentioned last time, the Wagoneer shared its SJ platform with the Jeep Gladiator pickup that also debuted in 1963. The Gladiator was available in several wheelbase lengths as was expected at the time, though all versions had only two doors as the extra length went right into bed capacity. The smallest Gladiator had a 120-inch wheelbase, while the midsize version had a wheelbase of 126 inches. The longest Gladiator (J300) used a 132-inch wheelbase. There was also a specialty 165-inch option used as a basis for campers.

Aiming to be smaller than full-size competitors, the Wagoneer chopped a full 10 inches off the shortest Gladiator and used a 110-inch wheelbase. Overall length was a tidy 186.4 inches, with a width of 74.8 inches, and overall height of 66.4”. Curb weight would balloon over time as engines grew larger and luxuries were layered on, but Wagoneer began in 1963 at 3,701 pounds.


Comparatively, the fifth generation Suburban (1960-1966) was available only as a two-door in all markets except Brazil. It rode on a 115-inch wheelbase, and had an overall length of 199.5 inches, with a substantial 79.5-inch width. The third generation IH Travelall (1961-1968) was available only as a four-door wagon. But it had an even longer wheelbase than the Suburban, at 119 inches. Travelall’s length spanned 203.9 inches, with a width of 77.6”.

With its tidy dimensions making it much more maneuverable than the competition, the Wagoneer also had them beat on body styles. Two-door versions were available as a wagon or panel truck, while all four-door versions were wagons. These three body style options would persist through 1968. Afterward, Wagoneer became a dedicated four-door model. Worth noting, the wagon model was designed as a wagon from its inception in contrast to Suburban and Travelall, which were a capped roof design applied to a four-door truck. 


All body styles of Wagoneer used an independent front suspension in rear-wheel drive configuration, and it was an optional extra on four-wheel drive examples at a cost of $135 ($1,439 adj.). The suspension was a new design for Jeep, and different to the Station Wagon’s Palandyne-type suspension. The Palandyne design used a transverse semi-elliptic leaf spring setup, with double-action hydraulic shock absorbers. 


Wagoneer’s independent front suspension implemented swing axles and torsion bar springs. Combined with short upper A-arms, the torsion bars were tied at their inner pivot points. This meant the swing axles functioned as the lower control arms. Four-wheel drive Wagoneers without independent front suspension used an axle up front: a Dana 27AF with a center-pivot.

The Jeep’s four-wheel drive system was a notably convenient feature at the time. Unlike trucks that had complicated four-wheel drive systems, the Wagoneer’s was activated by a single lever. Operated by a hydraulic clutch, the system was paired with manual Warn Industries hubs that required the driver to exit the Wagoneer to activate the four-wheel drive. 


Crucially, both two- and four-wheel drive Wagoneers were available with manual and automatic transmissions. The Wagoneer was the first mass production four-wheel drive vehicle to offer an automatic from the factory. The manual option was a three-speed from Borg-Warner (T-90J) in use from 1945. The automatic used in early Wagoneers was from Borg-Warner and was also a three-speed.

All Wagoneers had drum brakes at each corner that were 11 inches in diameter. For Wagoneers that would be put to work for duties other than people hauling, there were power take-off (PTO) options available from the factory. These implements were cataloged as Jeep’s Approved Special Equipment that could be powered by the Wagoneer’s engine. 


The engine in question was an all new inline-six called the Tornado. The development project was for a “new vehicle” at Jeep, and was assigned to chief engineer Sammy Sampietro. Work on the engine began in the late Fifties and took place in Europe. The focus of engine development was to improve power output via better air intake and management. 

The engine that resulted was an inline-six of 230 cubic inches (3.8L), and was a hemi, with hemispheric combustion chambers. It was the first post-WWII overhead cam engine that was mass-produced and designed by a United States firm. In addition to overhead cam innovation, the engine also used a crankshaft that was hardened by ferritic nitrocarburizing. In layman’s terms, it was bathed in a saline solution for two hours at 1,025 degrees Fahrenheit.  


Tornado also used a silent Morse timing chain that was covered in cast iron and designed for longevity. Aluminum construction was also used for many key components of the engine, like the valve cover, water pump, and intake manifold. That made for weight savings of about 40 pounds over the outgoing Super Hurricane engine, as Tornado’s total weight was 575 pounds. 


There were two different versions available: The standard had an 8:5:1 compression ratio, while the “high-efficiency” low compression version had 7:5:1. Power was 140 horses at high compression, or 133 horsepower at low compression. Torque figures were 210 lb-ft and 199 lb-ft, respectively. 

Unfortunately, the complex Tornado engine was a short-lived advancement. Engine failures occurred quickly and were down to a design fault. Front engine mounts bolted to an engine cover instead of to the engine block. The cover also sealed the timing chain. The cover mounting was too harsh for the timing chain gasket, and they quickly failed which caused oil loss and a seized engine. 


This only affected passenger vehicles with Tornado engines, as the military version used block-mounted motor mounts and had no such failure. The engine was used in Wagoneer in 1963 and 1964 only, before being replaced with two different AMC engine options in 1965. In our next installment we’ll take a look at the exterior details of the earliest Wagoneer, and see what made Jeep’s offering so special.


[Images: Jeep, GM, International]


Become a TTAC insider. the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 13 comments
  • Sundance Sundance on Feb 18, 2026

    "Suburban (1960-1966)" I believe this was the sixth generation.

  • FreedMike FreedMike on Feb 18, 2026

    "The cover also sealed the timing chain. The cover mounting was too harsh for the timing chain gasket, and they quickly failed which caused oil loss and a seized engine. "


    I was wondering where GM recruited all those engineers who worked on the Vega engine, Northstar and 3800...they poached them from Jeep.

    • Jeff Jeff on Feb 18, 2026

      FreedMike--The Vega engine was aluminum alloy with sleeveless cylinders and iron coated aluminum pistons. The engine block was iron. Ed Cole, President of GM at the time was insistent on using aluminum for the engine. The radiator on the Vega was 12 x 12 inches woefully undersized leading to frequent overheating, warped engine blocks, and blown head gaskets. Early Vegas had no coolant recovery tank, causing lost coolant to drain onto the road, while low radiator placement hindered circulation. There were many other cost cuts on the Vega that the engineers knew would affect the quality of the Vega. Rare Classic Cars and Automotive History has a good video on the development of the Vega. Could have been a good car if it weren't for GM management the same for the X cars.


  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next