Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part LXI)
In our last installment, we wrapped up the ninth generation Eldorado’s run in 1978. With expanded Custom Biarritz and Custom Biarritz Classic trims turning the coupe into a celebration of festoonery, change was in the wind at Cadillac. Let’s take a look at Cadillac’s impressive sales figures and model pricing between 1971 and 1978.
As Cadillac turned the page to the Seventies, it had a slow year. Down from a record high of 238,744 sales in 1970, the brand faltered to 188,537 sales in 1971. The lineup was new that year, and featured some gawky looking front ends with quad headlamps separated by Cadillac shield emblems.
At the base of the lineup was the Calais, available as a two-door hardtop for $5,934 ($47,928 adj.), or a four-door hardtop sedan that asked $6,110 ($49,350 adj.). Stepping up to the better trimmed two-door Coupe DeVille cost $6,299 ($50,877 adj.), and the Sedan DeVille asked $6,533 ($52,767 adj.).
Fleetwood models began with the Eldorado coupe, which asked $7,416 ($59,899 adj.), while the convertible was notably more expensive at $7,884 ($63,679 adj.). The Sixty Special, now confined to its more expensive Brougham trim cost $7,821 ($63,170 adj.). Finally, Fleetwood Seventy-Five was offered as a Sedan for $11,955 ($96,560 adj.), or as partitioned Limousine for $12,094 ($97,683 adj.).
Calais continued to be the least popular entry in the Cadillac lineup, and in 1971 just 3,360 coupes and 3,569 sedans were sold. The brand’s bread and butter remained the DeVille, which was accessible to more people than Fleetwood models and within the budget of most who might have considered a Calais. The Coupe DeVille managed 66,081 sales that year, while the Sedan DeVille was even more popular with 69,345 sales.
The Eldorado experienced its best sales ever in 1971 as 20,568 coupes and 6,800 convertibles were sold, besting 1970’s total of 23,842 cars. The Fleetwood Sixty Special saw a serious decline in demand at this time, falling from a sales total in 1970 of 18,651 to just 6,800 in 1971. Credit was perhaps due to the changing tastes of consumers, and the lesser desirability of the long-wheelbase formal sedan. Seventy-Five sales remained steady, with 848 Limousines and 752 Sedans sold in 1971.
Cadillac’s lineup was a carryover with minor edits from 1972 to 1976 so we’ll summarize only annual sales and Eldorado figures for brevity. Cadillac rebounded in 1972 to smash its sales record once more, with 267,787 sales. Of that figure, 40,074 were Fleetwood Eldorados with a base asking price of $7,360 ($57,566 adj.).
Sales soared to over 300,000 cars for the first time in 1973. The Eldorado (no longer a Fleetwood) was as popular as it had ever been too, racking up 51,451 sales. Eldorado coupe sales totaled 42,316 examples, while the convertible sold 9,315 times. The asking price that year started at $7,358 ($55,524 adj.).
As the lineup aged, sales fell in 1974 to a lesser 242,300 cars. The Eldorado was somewhat less popular, with 40,412 sales. Of that figure, 32,812 were coupes and 7,600 were convertibles. The asking price jumped notably in 1974, to $9,115 ($62,878 adj.).
Sales improved in 1975, though would not reach the 1973 high mark: 264,372. The Eldorado increased its sales to a total of 44,752. That year there were 35,802 coupes produced, and 8,950 convertibles. Eldorado’s asking price was $9,933 ($61,288 adj.).
In 1976, a last-of moment for much of Cadillac’s historical nomenclature, sales reached a new record of 309,139 cars. As Cadillac announced the convertible Eldorado was going extinct, it drove sales among speculators and collectors alike, who purchased an impressive 14,000 that year. The coupe’s sales were also improved, at 35,184 cars. Eldorado’s price crested the $10k mark for the first time, at $10,590 ($61,228 adj.).
It was a new model name world in 1977, as Cadillac removed traditional names, trimmed less successful models, and downsized its lineup. The Calais entry-level line was no more. It was replaced by the now entry-level C-body DeVille, and supplemented by the midsize flagship Seville for those who wanted a smaller vehicle.
Shifting away from its quality focus, Cadillac narrowed the Fleetwood designation of vehicles in 1977. The Sixty Special Brougham was replaced by the downsized Fleetwood Brougham. For reference, the Fleetwood Brougham had a foot shorter wheelbase than the Sixty Special, and was a foot shorter (221.2”) and over four inches narrower (75.3”). In 1972 Cadillac began shifting the focus from the Sixty Special name and transitioned to "Fleetwood Brougham" in 1973.
Fleetwood Brougham measurements matched those of the DeVille in 1977, as the Sixty Special’s replacement was no longer a stretched, larger full-size sedan. For this reason Fleetwood Brougham sales are lumped in with DeVille sales during this period, and it’s usually considered a trim of the DeVille. DeVille was available as two-door coupe or four-door sedan, while the Fleetwood Brougham was a four-door only until 1980. The hardtop period of Cadillac design was officially over.
Similarly downsized were new limousine models which were no longer called Seventy-Five. The long-wheelbase sedan was called Fleetwood Limousine, while the partitioned version intended for a chauffeur was the Fleetwood Formal Limousine. This smaller D-body Limousine would be the last rear-drive factory limousine produced by General Motors when it was eliminated after 1984. The only Cadillac not downsized was the Eldorado. As mentioned last time, the Eldorado soldiered on for two more years in 1977 and 1978.
Cadillac was rewarded for its downsizing to suit the times, with record breaking sales of 358,488 vehicles in 1977. DeVille and Fleetwood Brougham production made up the vast majority of Cadillac’s sales that year, as a total of 234,171 were produced. Coupe examples (138,750) handily outsold the sedans (95,421) in 1977. DeVille prices started at $9,650 ($53,027 adj.).
The Eldorado in its pre-downsized format experienced its best sales year yet in 1977, when 47,344 rolled out of showrooms. Its price had grown to $11,185 ($61,463 adj.) that year. No longer the halo vehicle it once was, the Eldorado was eclipsed in price by the Seville. A total of 45,060 Sevilles were sold in 1977, and each asked a high $13,360 ($73,414 adj.).
Limousine pricing is not available, however the math would work out to a total of 31,913 limo sales. Perhaps this figure was boosted by the lessening availability of domestic factory limousines, commercial sales, and coach firms that bought them to create stretch limos. The new Limousine was only 10 inches longer than the departed Sixty Special, so some of its former customers may have selected it as well.
Cadillac sales were slightly lower in 1978, but still reached 349,684. The Eldorado went strong as customers snapped up the coupe in its final full-size year, and 46,816 were sold. The coupe’s base price of $11,920 ($61,309 adj.) was often notably higher if equipped with a vinyl roof (Cabriolet) or fitted with either of the very expensive Biarritz trim packages.
The most expensive Cadillac in 1978 was the limited edition Gucci Seville, which was made into a fashion accessory complete with five-piece monogram luggage and gold interlocking G exterior emblems. Aldo Gucci himself said the special Seville gave “...the few fortunate owners a rare possession of distinction, beauty, and ultimate luxury.” It asked $19,900, or $102,354 today.
After a very successful disco run, the traditional full-size party was finished for Eldorado. The coupe would be reborn in 1979 as a much smaller vehicle with more modern amenities and some other tech features that had no problems whatsoever. We’ll pick up the tenth generation car next time.
[Images: General Motors]
Become a TTAC insider. the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.
More by Corey Lewis
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
- Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Comments
Join the conversation
Through downsizing and switching to FWD Cadillac alienated its traditional market, while not being able to attract those who were migrating to European (meaning primarily German) vehicles.
Some purchased European because they did not want to drive their father's/grandfather's car. Much like many now will not drive a minivan.
Others switched because the Europeans promoted their 'road handling' and 'performance'. Of course the European vehicles at the time were still primarily RWD, front engine vehicles. Unlike the domestic brands which were switching to FWD.
German styling also eventually won in that we now unfortunately have little, if any choice regarding interior instrument panel colours or type of upholstery.
Herb Tarlek's wet dream.
Those of you too young to remember the '70s, give thanks.