2017 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid's Price is the Latest Blow for Toyota's Prius

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Once upon a time, Toyota’s Prius was the only real choice for anyone looking to get into a futuristic “hybrid” car. The microscopic Honda Insight, looking like a tear dropped from a poet’s eye, held two seats — and that’s no good for taking your friends to book club.

As technology did what it has been known to do (advance), other automakers picked up the torch, outfitting conventional family sedans with battery packs and Atkinson-cycle engines. The segment soon became more diverse, just in time to see the public’s enthusiasm for hybrids taper off.

Now, from Japan’s neighbor, comes a new Hyundai model — offered as a hybrid or electric, and with a plug-in on the way — that undercuts the world’s most recognizable hybrid in price. Your move, Toyota.

As models roll out to dealer lots, Hyundai has announced pricing for both the hybrid and all-electric variant of its Ioniq family, all of which ride atop a dedicated electrified platform.

Selling a straight-up hybrid vehicle these days is tough, as buyers are either choosing to forgo cars in favor of big SUVs and crossovers, or opt for a plug-in variant that offers a measure of all-electric range. Both the Prius and Ioniq have plug-in models on the way.

Unfortunately for Toyota, the Ioniq Hybrid arrives with a lower entry price — $22,200, plus a $835 delivery charge, in base Blue trim. A mid-range SEL trim retails for $23,950, still lower than the base Prius price of $24,685 (plus delivery). Only the Ionic Hybrid’s top Limited trim goes higher with an MSRP of $27,500.

Hyundai, always the value pick, scores again on that front. When you’re a newcomer in a small and competitive market that isn’t exactly on fire, it’s best to do something to stand out. The Ioniq’s powertrain, which features a direct-injection 1.6-liter Atkinson-cycle four-cylinder mated to a 43-horsepower electric motor, makes a combined power rating of 138 hp, to the Prius’ 121.

While the Prius offers a continuously variable transmission for smooth efficiency, Hyundai has gone a different route, preferring the engaged feel of a six-speed dual-clutch automatic. For efficiency, Hyundai’s setup delivers more — an EPA-estimated 58 miles per gallon in combined driving, versus the Prius’s average of 52 mpg. (The Eco version is rated at 56 mpg.)

Coefficient of drag for both models is identical, at 0.24 Cd.

While it would seem the Ionic Hybrid excels in many areas, its electric counterpart arrives at a time when long-range, lower-cost EVs are beginning to hit the market. With 124 miles of range on tap, the Ioniq beats older models like the Ford Focus Electric and Nissan Leaf and matches the upgraded Volkswagen e-Golf. However, it falls far behind the Chevrolet Bolt’s 238 miles and upcoming Tesla Model 3’s 215.

One thing it does have going for it is price. The base Ioniq Electric carries a $29,500 MSRP before delivery, and before a federal tax credit that would push its price $7,500 lower. The Bolt, on the other hand, works out to about $30,000 after the credit.

After a radical redesign failed to result in a surge of new or returning buyers, Toyota’s Prius can only sit and chew its nails.

[Image: Hyundai Motor America]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 81 comments
  • Djsyndrome Djsyndrome on Feb 16, 2017

    Couple of things: "Both the Prius and Ioniq have plug-in models on the way." The Prius Prime has been out since December, but good luck finding one, as many dealerships are (wisely) selling them as order-only and not stocking any on the lots. The carbon fiber hatch that hindered early production isn't helping either. Regarding the Prius versus Ioniq: I bought a leftover '16 Prius full well knowing the Hyundai was imminent, mostly on the strength of our last three Toyotas all going well over 200k miles with minimal fuss. The Prius (Two model with the older NiMH battery) regularly gets over mpg without trying, which I expect to improve once we get off this awful winter gas and temperatures in the PNW warm back up. I'll believe the Ioniq's mpg figures after a year of Fuelly data.

  • Dmulyadi Dmulyadi on Feb 16, 2017

    Wow, Korean really want to beat Japanese in everything from electronic to cars to kpop vs jpop drama even if they come a bit later in the game. 80-90s Japanese made great midsize and compacts, then 10 years later Korean improved their midsize n compact, I only think cuz they hire a great designer. They did lie about the fuel economy few years ago. So no thanks fool me once shame on u fool me twice shame on me. I bought my 2nd gen 3 years ago for $2.9k it had 200k. It has 252k now not bad for a 2005. Still get 48-50mpg in NYC. Still drive good n low maintenance. Nothing rattle inside or outside. Typical Japanese made car. Why Korean go start selling hybrid now? Why don't they jump to long range electric? Even Toyota now put all her resources to catch up on long range electric car. Toyota tried to improve the hybrid very hard and they said it almost reached the maximum efficiency and here Korean claim they can do better with less experience in building hybrid car. I just don't buy it. Sorry I don't believe in new untested products. Unlike Toyota hybrids that have been in the market for so long they must have learn their mistake n improved it further. That's why Korean try to beat Japanese using the I sell u cheaper than them aka dumping. As long they win something.

    • See 1 previous
    • Bd2 Bd2 on Feb 20, 2017

      Um, Hyundai (and Kia) have been doing hybrids for some time now. The Ioniq (and Niro) in its hybrid format is basically the 3rd gen hybrid powertrain for H/K. And H/K were committed to EVs before Toyota (Toyota had long shunned EVs in favor of the hybrid, but just recently reversed course; as they had also done with turbo-charging) - which is why they developed the platform underpinning the Ioniq and Niro to be compatible with a hybrid, PHEV and EV powertrains from the start.

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next