Fisker EMotion: On Four Wings and a Battery Prayer

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Auto executive and hypeman extraordinaire Henrik Fisker has trickled out details and images of his upcoming electric supercar, the EMotion, but the details simply raise more questions about the vehicle and its technological feasibility.

Eye-rolling name and marketing buzzwords aside, the CEO of the newly formed Fisker Inc. has laid bare the basic abilities of the vehicle, which is expected to debut next year. Boasting a predicted range of 400 miles, the EMotion’s long legs and claimed top speed of 161 miles per hour all depend on a cutting edge technology that some experts say is flawed — at least for use in electric cars.

Fisker, always the optimist, claims this isn’t a problem.

The EMotion sports scissor-style doors that make for a great teaser photo and possesses what Fisker claims is top-notch rear seat room, accomplished by moving the cabin forward. Sure, it looks somewhat like a compressed Fisker Karma, but with hints of Star Wars and the AMC Javelin up front.

Aluminum, composite materials and carbon fiber make up the vehicle’s body, so you know this thing won’t come with a low sticker price.

Assuming the doors don’t go Maximum Overdrive on the vehicle’s occupants — a nasty trait that plagued early Tesla Model X buyers — the number one potential weakness for Fisker, besides the financial risk of building a high-end car from scratch, is his EV’s stored energy. An electric car is only as good as its battery allows, and this battery needs to fulfill a big promise.

The EMotion will have the “longest electric range of any production car previously developed,” Fisker claims. How does he plan to pull it off? With graphene. Forget lithium-ion batteries, or even the word “battery” — the Fisker EMotion draws its energy from a graphene supercapacitor.

Graphene, the world’s thinnest and strongest substance, conducts electricity much faster than any other material. It’s a superhighway for electrons, promising incredibly fast charging times. There’s two major problems with a graphene supercapacitor: scarcity of the material, which drives up costs, and the low energy density of a supercapacitor.

Speaking to Business Insider, Lucia Gauchia, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering and energy storage systems at Michigan Technological University, said that graphene hasn’t caught on in the marketplace.

“The reason we are not using it yet, even though the material is not a new one, is that there is no mass production for it yet that can show reasonable cost and scalability,” said Gauchia.

Fisker to the rescue! Jack Kavanaugh, head of Fisker Nanotech, the automaker’s battery supplier, claims that’s not a problem. He told Business Insider that his company is patenting a machine that could “feasibly” produce 1,000 kilograms (2,205 pounds) of graphene at a cost of 10 cents per kilo. And that pesky energy storage problem? Also solved, Kavanaugh claims.

“The challenge with using graphene in a supercapacitor in the past has been that you don’t have the same density and ability to store as much energy,” Kavanaugh said. “Well we have solved that issue with technology we are working on.”

Kavanaugh wouldn’t explain his team’s breakthrough, only saying that altering the structure of graphene would improve the supercapacitor’s energy density.

Suffice it to say there’s still plenty of question marks surrounding the feasibility of this vehicle. If Fisker Inc. really does solve the energy storage problem, then future kudos are deserved. Such a breakthrough could impact the entire automotive industry, but until the vehicle is shown to travel 400 miles on a charge, its “game-changing” abilities exist solely in the realm of the theoretical.

The EMotion will be produced in an existing factory in the U.S., Fisker claims, possibly at specialty car company VLF Automotive’s plant in Auburn Hills, Michigan. Fisker, of course, knows all about that place.

[Sources: Digital Trends, Business Insider] [Image: Fisker Inc.]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 25 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Nov 01, 2016

    Graphene supercaps.... This is a moon shot. Tesla wisely used 18650 cells in the Roadster, S, and X, because there was great risk in developing a new technology - risk that could sink the company before it got going. Packaging ~7000 cells has proven to be challenging enough, not to mention building actual cars. Even now, Tesla's big stretch is going with the new 21700 form factor for the Model 3. Likewise, other EV mfrs have all stuck with lithium ion, with incremental, low-risk advances in energy density. I'm all for bold risk-taking, but reality tells me that we'll never see that rendered car subjected to a road test.

  • NeilM NeilM on Nov 01, 2016

    Hey, I"ve got an electric lawnmower called an E•Go, so surely Fisker can have a car called the EMotion. (F-ing autocorrect keeps wanting to change that mid-cap.)

    • See 1 previous
    • NeilM NeilM on Nov 03, 2016

      @SCE to AUX This is my third year of using the E•Go mower, and I love it. It's not suited for, say, half acre lawns, but for anything normal it's terrific. To give you an idea, my lawn takes 20 minutes or so to mow, and that uses up no more than half of the 56V lithium battery's charge.

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next