Abandoned History: Cadillac's Northstar V8, Head Bolts and Gaskets Aplenty (Part III)
In our last installment of the Cadillac Northstar story, we reviewed the engineering decisions made early in the engine’s development. From the sensible choice of 4.5 liters of displacement (4.6 in production) to the hubris of consumer focus groups filled with aging current owners, the project rolled forward but faced many engineering challenges. The development was daunting as Cadillac’s first dual overhead cam V8 engine after decades of overhead valve power plants. The difficulty of pairing a cast aluminum block to iron cylinder liners was complete, but engineers opened up a new can of worms with the induction system.
In brief, a car’s induction system is responsible for sending fuel and air into the combustion chamber. Major components of an engine’s induction system include the intake manifold, injectors, throttle body, valves, and the air filter assembly. In the forefront of engineers’ minds was the “high technology” phrase that kept being repeated. Top management said it, the customer said it, and Cadillac’s flop of a 4.1 said it right on the engine block. High technology!
To that end, there were many prototype designs for the induction system which dragged on for some time. It would prove to be the most difficult part of the engine’s development, and indeed problematic when it hit production as well. Cadillac’s engineers decided to go with an intake manifold made of magnesium.
General Motors had little experience with magnesium in any of its engines, but decided Northstar was the time to step it up. Many automotive applications are not suitable for magnesium components: Magnesium alloys have a low strength at high temperatures, and have poor resistance to corrosion. Magnesium is subject to all main types of corrosion, which includes galvanic, uniform, pitting, and stress corrosion.
Engineers proceeded anyway, as they heard the siren call of magnesium’s lightweight properties. Visions of the heavy small block V8s of the past filled their heads, and they wanted no part of that for the all-Northstar future. The manifold had to be tested extensively to ensure it was strong enough to last through extended high-stress engine usage without developing cracks.
Strength wasn’t the only concern, as during development there were issues with its design that caused backfiring. If the valves were stopped in a certain position upon engine shut down, unburned fuel was left in the intake manifold. Starting the engine again, the leftovers caused a backfire.
Engineers were not prepared to cut their losses with “the magnesium bucket,” as they called it, and had to rework the ignition to prevent the backfiring. This required a separate ignition coil system (more on that later). But at last the bucket was ready for production.
The induction system used a magnesium plenum housing, with glass-filled thermoplastic induction tubes. A magnesium design did cut down on machining requirements, as it was a more precise casting. The fuel rail assembly was made of nylon. PVC and EGR systems were both implemented in the design as well, for lower emissions.
All first-year Northstar engines featured a magnesium intake manifold. Immediately after development GM knew it wasn’t the best long-term course of action, and started another induction system program on Northstar. Engineers worked quickly to develop a composite (plastic) intake manifold instead. After the first year of engines, the manifold was switched to the composite version and customers were none the wiser.
A more successful engineering development for Northstar was its unique cooling system. The engine’s coolant pump was placed at the rear of the engine, and driven by the left side intake camshaft. This design allowed external coolant plumbing to be simpler. Included in the system was its party piece: four-cylinder operation after a complete loss of coolant.
The engine control module (ECM) included alternative programming upon a loss of coolant. After loss was detected, the ECM ran its overheating protection operation and changed the Northstar to run on four cylinders instead of eight. When those four cylinders got too hot, it would activate the other four. This allowed travel to a service location upon coolant loss, and prevented a driver being stranded.
To prevent backfiring, the aforementioned ignition coil system used four coils and one control module. Working in tandem with a camshaft position sensor, two crankshaft position sensors, and a wheel on the crankshaft, all were designed to make engine synchronization as fast as possible on startup. It was managed through a powertrain control module (PCM), which controlled spark and injection, reading and diagnostics. If any of the above failed, the engine was programmed not to start.
The PCM was also the overseer of the engine and transmission, ensuring all information on the powertrain converged in a single place. This advanced processor had an impressive 128 kilobytes of memory, or the same as a 1983 Apple IIe. With this power the PCM was able to manage monitoring, fuel economy, engine performance, and control the transmission based on acceleration inputs and whether the traction control system was intervening.
All the engines whiz-bang new features were well and good, but they needed a bit of marketing and packaging as they extended beyond the Northstar engine itself. Cadillac trademarked a name for this suite of performance and technology features, set to debut on the 1993 Cadillac Allanté (the brand’s halo car). A Northstar System was created.
Do we even use it? Cadillac was ready for the Nineties with a discontinuation of its old staid product, and the arrival of a new lineup of Northstar System-equipped front-drive performance luxury coupes and sedans. The time for Brougham had run its course. We’ll pick up there next week.
[Images: GM]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.
More by Corey Lewis
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
Two aspects of this article stand out for me.
I once knew someone years ago who swapped a Northstar V8 into a...Ferrari 348!!! I asked him then (about 3-4 years or so ago), if he knew about the Northstar reputation, and he replied that he did after the swap...