Rare Rides: The 1954 Woodill Wildfire-Buick, Fiberglass and Fun-sized

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today’s Rare Ride was formerly unknown to your author. A brief boutique brand in the Fifties, Woodill went away long before most of you were even born. Let’s see if we can learn a bit more about this American take on the classic British roadster formula.

In the early Fifties, fiberglass started its spread across America as an easily workable, affordable material for use in the construction of sporty car bodies. The first of this new kind of sports car to enter production was the Glasspar G2, produced by Bill Tritt (a yacht maker) in 1949. In those days such roadsters were not offered by the major OEMs in Detroit, which opened a path for smaller shed-built, or “boutique” if you prefer, cars.

In short order, car dealers entered into small-scale production of their own takes on the idea created by the G2. That’s where Woodill entered the picture: A successful dealer of Willys trucks in California, he imagined his own G2-type vehicle. The roadster would of course be driven by Willys parts underneath. Woodill commissioned a Glasspar-built body from Tritt, then took his idea to Willys HQ, where he was quickly shot down. At the time Willys was in merger talks with Kaiser, and the Kaiser-Darrin roadster was already well into its development.

“I’ll do it myself then,” said Woodill. Shortly thereafter, the new Woodill Wildfire was ready for sale. Available at his dealership, the Wildfire used Willys mechanicals as planned; a low-power inline-six and manual transmission. Starting in 1952, the car was available in kit form, or as a complete car built by Woodill.

The Wildfire dumped the mostly unsuitable Willys engine for a Ford V8 at some point, but by then a little fiberglass competition had arrived – the Corvette. Corvette spelled the beginning of the end for piecemeal fiberglass cars from car dealers when it was introduced in 1953, as consumers eagerly threw their dollars at General Motors. The Wildfire remained on offer through 1958, with roughly 300 produced. Of that figure, 15 were sold as complete cars, and 285 as kits.

But today’s Rare Ride is an even rarer subset of those kit cars. In 1954 a few kits were purchased by a Buick dealer in California, Harry Clark. Clark put his own (fairly extensive) Buickification on the Wildfire. The front featured ’53 Buick lamps, and a modified form of a Chevy grille from the same year. He used a more curved windshield than the standard Wildfire. Clark also grabbed the rear fender molds from a ’53 Buick, and made them in fiberglass for his roadster. And perhaps most notably to add an upscale Buick vibe, a continental kit was attached at the rear. Chrome bumpers front and rear were donated by Ford, for some reason.

Power for these few examples was GM as well, in the form of the new 322 cubic inch Nailhead V8 from Buick. It was luxuriously matched with a Dynaflow automatic transmission, with floor-mount lever.

The extensive changes turned the Wildfire into a Wildfire-Buick, its only badging the Buick crest on the steering wheel. Perhaps the only one left today, this fully restored roadster asks $67,500. The joy of explaining what it is every time you park is thrown in for free.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 14 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on Oct 01, 2020

    Looks bad from the rear but still an interesting car . To bad about the DynaSquish box, you have to suffer driving one to fully grasp how awful they are . -Nate

    • See 2 previous
    • Mcs Mcs on Oct 04, 2020

      @-Nate "No, the Dynaflow slush box had three ‘turbines’ in it " The triple turbine was only for 1958 and 1959.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Oct 01, 2020

    The tail lights look like those on a 53 Buick. Looks like they reached into the parts bin for 53 Buicks.

  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next