Buy/Drive/Burn: H-body Hotness in 1999 - the Final-year Showdown

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

As we were rustling up commentary in the last edition of Buy/Drive/Burn, conversation naturally turned to other front-drive sedans available that same year. The discussion sparked the idea for another General Motors same-body showdown, like we saw previously with the luxurious C-body.

Today we’re talking H-body 3800 fun from Oldsmobile, Buick, and Pontiac.

By 1999, the long-lived H-body had run its course. Underpinning larger sedans since the 1986 model year, General Motors was ready to wrap it up. What we have here are the final, ultimate versions of H-body sedans.

Oldsmobile LSS

We start off today with the least remembered of our trio. The 10th-generation Eighty Eight model debuted for the 1992 model year, in what would be its last iteration. Various trim shuffling happened throughout the years, as the Eighty Eight took over luxury duties for the Ninety Eight (which departed in 1996). The LSS maintained significance as the sporty Eighty Eight offering throughout the run. For the 1996 model year, the LSS switched to the supercharged Series II Buick 3800 V6, providing the sedan with 240 horsepower. LSS featured Aurora-inspired seating, shared similar wheels to the Aurora, and had a more modern overall interior look compared to the other trims. Unlike the luxury-oriented versions, the LSS had a center console. It was subtle sport from Oldsmobile.

Pontiac Bonneville SSEi

Pontiac’s long-lived Bonneville name entered its ninth generation with the other two H-bodies for the 1992 model year. Along with Buick’s LeSabre, it was granted a stay of execution, and would see its 10th generation fade from view after 2005. This ninth generation received more aggressive lower cladding, relocated fog lamps, and reshaped front and rear lighting for 1996. Like the LSS, the Series II 3800 was supercharged in the SSEi trim, and an option on the lower SSE version. The volume of buttons and the sculpted leather seats set the SSEi apart from any other H-body.

Buick LeSabre Limited

Last but not least, the least sporty of our H-body trio. Unlike the LSS, LeSabre would live on past its seventh generation, closing out the 2005 model year as Buick ushered in the Lucerne. The upscale Limited trim level netted buyers better alloys and a trunk pass-through from the rear seat. Like the other two, an engine upgrade for the ’96 model year switched the Buick 3800 from Series I to Series II. LeSabre gained 35 horsepower, for a new total of 210. No supercharger option on either LeSabre trim; Buick forced the upgrade to the larger, much more expensive Park Avenue Ultra. Subsequent cosmetic upgrades like a revised grille and gauge cluster waited until 1997. This is the H-body most likely seen in 2018, still puttering around town.

Firm, frantic, or floaty? Which final H-body sedan is for you?

[Images: GM]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 65 comments
  • JohnTaurus JohnTaurus on Jul 27, 2018

    Look at what just popped up on craigslist (I search a several hundred mile radius from me): https://jackson.craigslist.org/cto/d/1995-pontiac-bonneville/6655300042.html She's so purdy. Someone needs to make her a member of the B&B's fleet.

    • See 2 previous
    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Jul 27, 2018

      @JohnTaurus Haha, oh no - I'm being good and keeping to my two car limit. I plan on upgrading M -> GS soon, and that will keep the car boredom at bay.

  • Lesabrefire Lesabrefire on Aug 10, 2019

    MRF 95 TBird T-Type indeed, had 3 LeSabre T's, very impressive handling, great aerodynamics, 3.8 engine lacked power though and an unreliable transmission for the late eighties, it was, though, fairly easy to work on, seen a few with a 3800 SC swaps and one with a 4.9 Cadillac. Were only made for 3 years though.

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next