Killing Me Softly: The Slow Death Of Opel

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Opels head shop steward Klaus Franz is mightily mad at Opel’s CEO Nick Reilly. Reilly told the London Times that the Ampera, Opel’s counterpart to the Volt, may be built in the Ellesmere Port plant in the UK:“The chances are quite good that the Ampera will come to Ellesmere Port as it is close in production terms to the Astra and will share many components,” Reilly said. In the meantime, Berlin cues Roberta Flack’s “Killing me softly” as a prelude for Opel’s funeral.

It’s a minefield out there, and Riley steps right in: According to the Times, “any commitment by Vauxhall to bring the Ampera to the UK will come with heavy caveats and pleas for further state subsidy. It has already received £270 million of loan guarantees from the Government to increase Astra production.”

Reilly is holding out for more money. For the Ampera to come to Britain, “the conditions must be favourable”, Mr Reilly said to the Times “If there is no incentivisation, you would be more likely to go where the incentives might be, like Spain or elsewhere.”

The Commissars in Brussels listen intently and are taking notes. They need every cent to save Greece and other Euro-threatening states. Reilly’s loose lips will save unnecessary expenses: State support in return for job guarantees are strictly verboten in the EU. The talk in the UK sounds as if someone tries to attract flak from the EU.

Franz noted that the Ampera had already “been promised to Premier Jürgen Rüttgers for Bochum.” Franz also complained that the Astra Sports Tourer, which was to be built in Opel’s main plant in Rüsselsheim, has been moved to Ellesmere Port. Franz reminds Reilly that the €300m of state aid from the U.K. is dependent on state aid from other countries, the most notable being Germany.

Today, it became clear that Germany won’t be spending any money anytime soon. The “Credit Guarantee Committee” (“Bürgschaftsausschuss”) of the German government convened today as planned. As previously leaked, the committee decided to decide nothing.

Most alarmingly (for Reilly,) the committee leaked today that there will be no decision before the election in North Rhine-Westphalia in early May, heard Das Autohaus. North Rhine-Westphalia is home to Opel’s Bochum plant, and with the elections gone, gone will be the last reason to spend any German tax payer money. We’ve said it before, we say it again: Everybody knows that Europe has overcapacity in cars. European car sales are back at carmageddon levels. With subsidies running out, it is a bloodbath in the making. Everybody knows it, nobody wants to be caught saying it: Any subsidized car that Opel sells is missing from the sales of other European car manufacturers, notably Volkswagen. Something, someone has to go. The most likely candidate? U.S. government owned, rattlesnake-killer led GM’s Opel.

Ho to get rid of Opel? Slowly. “I prayed that he would finish, but he just kept right on.”

Dow Jones Germany reports that the German government has many “open questions about the Opel restructuring plan. As long as these ambiguities are not eliminated, there will be no government aid from Germany.”

The ambiguities are the old standbys: Inflated license fees, the possibility that German government money will seep in the direction of Detroit, the lack of concessions from the Opel employees, and GM’s financial contribution. While they are at it, the German government is accusing GM of creative accounting: The bridge loan that was extended by the German government and paid back last November is listed as GM’s restructuring contribution.

In other words, the answer from Berlin is: Nein.

But nobody will give a clear “Nein” before the elections. Maybe not even after the elections. The German government simply has to play for time. Time is money. Eventually, Opel will run out of time and money and has to throw in the towel. Berlin would rather see GM give up. Driving someone to suicide is much more socially acceptable than outright murder.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 8 comments
  • Jimboy Jimboy on Mar 25, 2010

    Keep Opel as a design/engineering lead for GM europe, cut production back to reflect the real market. Opel becomes more of a specialty market product that feeds Europe, UK, and the US, maybe some Asian markets as well, something like Lotus is now. The UK could certainly handle both lhd and rhd models with reduced production numbers. Altho I do agree Bertel, the Brit's reputation for shoddy workmanship would have to be addressed.

  • Tricky Dicky Tricky Dicky on Mar 25, 2010

    The UK gov't have played clever on this one. With a General Election less than 6 weeks away, they've created the impression that they are willing to fight to guarantee UK jobs and attract new technology into the UK, but without spending a penny. By making their aid conditional, they've got a huge get out of jail card. Also, if anyone's noticed, in the last few weeks Ford and Nissan have announced significant new manufacturing projects in the UK. Previously it looked like the manufacturing side of the auto-industry was doomed there. Now it seems that people have taken a view on the long term strength of the Pound versus the Euro and have concluded that the UK is now one of the cheaper places to make cars in western europe. However, this is no way will compensate for the lack of oxygen being granted to Opel. The WSJ reported on 26th Feb that Opel have liquidity to get them through 1st half of 2010. So if there is no decision prior to the North Rhine-Westphalia election in early May, that gives a window of a few weeks to rescue Opel. GM are going to have to make their minds up PDQ if they think this business is worth saving because right now, they are headed for the plug hole in the bath.

    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Mar 25, 2010

      Except that you don't want to produce in a country with a strong currency. You want a weak currency. Compared to 2007, the Pound is still relatively weak against the EUR. Recent Greece-induced fluctuations of the EUR haven't done much, in the grand scheme of things. If you want to produce in Europe for Europe, you want to produce in a Euro zone country to completely eliminate the vagaries of exchange rates, and you want to produce in a low wage country. Eastern Europe currently best for new setups. If you think the pound will remain weak against the EUR (it looks like it could get weaker once the Club Med troubles are addressed, and the EUR goes up again,) then the UK is not a bad place to produce. But it remains a currency bet. Never good for the long term.

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next