White House Vows to Investigate Security Risks Posed by Foreign-Connected Vehicle Tech
On Thursday, the Biden administration announced plans to investigate the potential national security risks being confronted by American automakers and any threats posed by connected vehicle technologies controlled by foreign adversaries — including China.
With the issue having been front-and-center in the minds of legislators and industry groups for months, the White House is reportedly taking action regarding China’s determination “to dominate the future of the auto market.”
The relevant press release from the Biden administration stipulates that China may rely on “unfair practices” and policies that could “flood our market with its vehicles, posing risks to our national security.”
Most cars these days are “connected” – they are like smart phones on wheels. These cars are connected to our phones, to navigation systems, to critical infrastructure, and to the companies that made them. Connected vehicles from China could collect sensitive data about our citizens and our infrastructure and send this data back to the People’s Republic of China. These vehicles could be remotely accessed or disabled.
China imposes restrictions on American autos and other foreign autos operating in China. Why should connected vehicles from China be allowed to operate in our country without safeguards?
So today, I am announcing unprecedented actions to ensure that cars on U.S. roads from countries of concern like China do not undermine our national security. I have directed my Secretary of Commerce to conduct an investigation into connected vehicles with technology from countries of concern and to take action to respond to the risks.
The Chinese government has conducted similar investigations into American brands. Tesla vehicles were once prohibited from parking at military bases after concerns were raised that their exterior cameras and permanent connectivity features allowed for data harvesting that could be used to help the United States spy.
As previously reported, China’s BYD is likewise plotting a course to establish a facility in Mexico that would build all-electric passenger vehicles. This has sent various legislators and industry groups into a tizzy, though the United States has been introducing prospective policy changes to bar the Chinese from getting too comfortable within the automotive and energy sectors — at least those operating within the confines of North America.
China has long taken similar efforts to do the same to American brands vying to operate within its borders. While foreign automotive brands are relatively common in the Asian country these days, the Chinese government has historically forced all outside entities into creating joint ventures with domestic brands in order to do business. Despite China and the United States having a massive trade relationship, there remains a massive trade deficit that advantages China.
In 2022, the U.S. goods and services trade deficit with China was over $367 billion. Though some would argue this is the result of the United States spending decades offshoring production and becoming dependent upon foreign entities to provide goods associated with entire business sectors (e.g. medicine, textiles, home electronics, etc). It’s worth noting that the industries that the U.S. government seems particularly concerned with are those that remain influential on the domestic market — most notably energy and automotive.
Biden promised that he would "do right by autoworkers and middle-class families" dependent upon the continued existence of domestic labor. He also said the government would take additional actions to ensure the future of the automotive industry would be made in America, adding that connected vehicles from China could collect sensitive data about U.S. citizens and infrastructure. However, nothing was said about the data harvesting used by domestic companies which many (including your author) have said are completely unacceptable invasions of privacy. The same seems to go for foreign-owned brands that have been deemed friendly by the U.S. government.
[Image: The White House]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
"White House Vows to Investigate Security Risks Posed by Foreign-Connected Vehicle Tech"LOL, dem furriners are stealing our information!!!! It's funny how implied bigotry can be deployed by the same people who decry it. Then again Biden is mostly celery, so who knows which of his handlers/night nurses typed this up and hit send.
Just once I want to see him type one of these releases with all of his infamous verbal diarrhea and rambling and have it end with just a pool of slobber at the bottom of the page. Like he left it on the kitchen counter and Dr. Jill Biden accidentally left a pile of potato chips on it.
Are you dumb enough to let the car connect ? .. well then you deserve it.
But then again your cell phone is way way way way WAY worse than your car trying to snoop other access points and devices near by. And of in reality The US intelligence agency literally kills people using data brokers soooo... china is not the only one in the room abusing mobile tech