VW’s EV Subsidiary May be Scouting for Public Offering in Future

Michael Strong
by Michael Strong

Volkswagen’s U.S.-based EV subsidiary, Scout Motors, was set up to become its own company in the future.


Scott Keogh, Scout’s CEO, told Handelsblatt the company was designed to be its own company from the get-go. The move to draw cash from investors was “an option that is on the table,” he told the German newspaper over the weekend.

He noted that despite the company’s delayed production schedule, spinning off from its German parent company is still a realistic possibility. He noted there are U.S. investor groups still bullish on the growth of electric vehicles and the country’s “industrial renaissance.” He didn’t offer specific firms.

Before there is a public offering, VW officials are hoping the Scout will fulfill its mission of expanding the German automaker’s market share in the U.S. However, the recent production delays has engendered some doubt in the mind of many top decision makers, Handelsblatt reported.

Keogh, who headed up VW of America before taking the lead role at Scout, ​noted the company’s robust trucks and SUVs paired with gasoline-powered range ​extenders have been the company’s most popular pre-ordered vehicles. In fact, ​87 percent ⁠of more than 170,000 pre-orders included range extenders.

Last month it was revealed Scout’s first vehicles will be delayed with the Traveler SUV not arriving until 2028 and the Terra pickup in 2030. AutoForecast Solutions, which produces a regular forecast of when vehicles will begin or change production,  said in a report that production of the Traveler SUV will begin Sept. 1, 2028. Meanwhile, the Terra pickup will start March 1, 2030. Both vehicles will be produced at the company’s new plant in Blythewood, South Carolina, just outside Columbia.

Both vehicles were initially slated to begin March 1, 2028, but the company is taking more time to shakedown the vehicles, the first for the newly formed company, which was created in 2022. Production was initially targeted for next year. 

Traveler orders came in at nearly a 3-to-1 ratio over the Terra pickup, Scout officials noted, adding there were more than 160,000 reservations for vehicles earlier this year. The Blythewood plant will be capable of producing 200,000 vehicles annually, and is expected to employ about 4,000 people when at full capacity. 


[Images: Scout Motors]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Michael Strong
Michael Strong

Michael Strong has spent more than 25 years writing about the automotive industry. A Detroit-area native, he’s written about everything from local car shows to product reviews to financial news. Currently he writes and edits for a variety of national and local publications. He’s also a longtime member of the Automotive Press Association and the International Motor Press Association, and a graduate of Georgia Southern University. Hail Southern! Despite a love for ’70s land yachts and BMWs from the late ’80s and early ’90s, his personal vehicle is neither of those.

More by Michael Strong

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 25 comments
  • Jrhmobile Jrhmobile on May 12, 2026

    This is subterfuge.


    And providing a rationalization to establish Scout "separate enough" to justify direct sales and bypass state dealership laws. These plans will dissipate once enough factory showrooms are established around the country.

    • Hummer Hummer on May 12, 2026

      It's a stopgap to see if the company is successful enough to become a real player in the industry.

      Basically two routes for new brands to get to the market.


      Tesla - Where they fight every state that does not allow direct sales until they're large enough and selling enough cars to justify dealerships just like all the other brands.

      Ineos - Where they don't have the money to fight for direct sales so they just get a couple bespoke hole in the walls to support them with varying degrees of success.



  • Program Program on May 12, 2026

    tbf, i thought all the ev kickstarter type startups from 10+ years ago were vaporware. a bunch of them now make cars ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • See 3 previous
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
  • Pwrwrench IIRC the most efficient version of the CRX was not sold in California, due to the "tune" of the 50+ mpg engine not meeting the emissions standards. The ones sold in California were rated in the upper 40s.Also, nearly all of these that I saw in SoCal were red, except for a few white ones.
Next