Washington State Introduces Bills to Legalize Direct-to-Consumer EV Sales
Following news that Florida-based Volkswagen dealerships would be suing Scout Motors over its direct-to-consumer sales, it was brought to our attention that Washington State was likewise coming to grips with non-traditional retail methods. The Pacific Northwest apparently wants to see more all-electric vehicles and is entertaining the prospect of giving them more leeway in order to improve sales volumes — something it has already done for Tesla.
Like much of the United States, Washington has legislation on the books that prohibits the direct sale of automobiles to retail customers. Tesla is the region’s one exception after having obtained an exception from the government a decade ago. This is because Washington has been on an EV kick for quite some time and Tesla was simply the first brand on the scene.
The state had numerous tax rebates available for individuals purchasing EVs and had at one point even made EVs and PHEVs tax-exempt. This was in addition to federal incentives and undoubtedly helped contribute toward making the region a hot spot for all-electric vehicles. Washington is also one of roughly a dozen states with leadership that has likewise vowed to adhere to Californian emission standards — which includes banning the sale of internal combustion vehicles by 2035.
However, a good portion of the local subsidies have dried up and Washington still seems keen to push consumers toward electric vehicles. To address the matter, a bipartisan proposal has suggested expanding direct-to-consumer sales exceptions to all EVs. This would put brands like Rivian on more equal footing with Tesla and could potentially open the door for legacy manufacturers to likewise sell their products directly, provided that the relevant models are electrified.
House Bill 1721 — and its companion Senate Bill 5592 — seek to re-establish what exactly constitutes “zero-emissions” and how to create a situation where companies are able to circumvent the dealer model. Additionally, SB 5377 was proposed to revoke Tesla’s existing exception in order to place it on equal footing with other brands selling within the state.
“We’re moving in this direction. I want to give consumers more options as we make this transition,” Rep. Beth Doglio (D-Olympia), was quoted as saying by the Washington State Standard.
Dealers within the region are predictably not thrilled with the premise of letting manufacturers take over sales, as it would presumably mean less business for them. But the Washington State Department of Commerce has an aggressive plan in place to boost the sale of all-electric vehicles via funding for charging infrastructure and changing laws to prioritize EVs. Direct-to-consumer sales have become another aspect of the broader strategy.
From the Washington State Standard:
The stated intent of the proposed legislation is to end the prohibition on direct sales “while ensuring that traditional auto dealers are supported in transitioning to a zero emissions vehicle-focused market.”
Under the bill, a carmaker could directly sell zero-emission vehicles if it has set up at least two service centers in the state and provides a mobile service too.
It also provides grants to auto dealerships to train their technicians on maintenance of zero-emission vehicles and charging systems. And dealerships can receive other incentives as they increase their sales of EVs.
That last item is undoubtedly there to appease dealerships who will undoubtedly come out in opposition to the scheme. Based on what we’ve seen in other states, lawsuits and lobbying are probably a guarantee. But Washington's main goal doesn’t appear to be eliminating dealerships. Based on the relevant proposals, showrooms that can prove themselves adept as selling EVs will be eligible for subsidization.
Readers interested in all the fine print (keep in mind the bills are all subject to change until they’re officially signed into law) can view HB 1721, SB 5592, and SB 5377 in their own time. Meanwhile, the Washington State Legislature plans on holding hearings on all of the above bills in the coming days.
[Image: Ian Dewar Photography/Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
I think I just accidentally ordered a Hyundai from Amazon. What year is this? Who is the President?
"Nurse? Someone help this man -- and take away his internet access!"
Dealers for traditional automakers don't want to deal with EVs, so fine, let the automakers handle the EVs directly. I personally don't see the 2035 EV mandate coming to fruition so in theory dealerships should be able to continue effing over ICE shoppers for many decades to come