Toyota Financial Ordered to Pay $60M Penalty

by Matthew Guy

Published: November 20th, 2023

toyota financial ordered to pay 60m penalty

In yet another chapter of dealers (and their financial arms) behaving badly, Toyota Motor Credit has been levied $12 million civil fine and also order to fork over $48 million in restitution after a court found the organization played fast and loose with some rules.

At issue were items described by the court as “product bundles” which the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau alleges were nigh-impossible to cancel once pushed through the approval process. This, they say, drove up monthly payments of hapless customers. Anyone who’s been plunked into the business office of a dealership knows exactly the types of bundles to which the CFPB is alluding.

Interestingly, the company apparently did not admit or deny liability whilst agreeing to settle the case. A number – thousands, according to the regular – of customers seemingly complained about being saddled with these add-on bundles, alleging shadiness at the dealer level about if these packages were mandatory or the rushing of paperwork in apparent attempts to obfuscate true costs.

But the dealers aren’t all to blame, it seems. The regulator goes on to say that Toyota Motor Credit went out of its way to making the reversal of these charges “extremely cumbersome”, including the practice of routing callers to agents instructed to discourage cancellations. In some cases, refunds are alleged to not have been given at all – whether due to requests falling through the cracks, someone losing paperwork, or willful maliciousness is unclear.

According to reports, the consent order instructs Toyota Motor Credit to simplify the process for cancelling unwanted product bundles whilst also agreeing to monitor the conduct of its dealer body more closely. As well, it is suggested they also copped to ensuring employee pay and performance metrics are not tied to sales of these bundles but anyone with even a passing knowledge of dealer management techniques know that decree is all but impossible to enforce. In a statement, Toyota Motor Credit said it "admitted to no wrongdoing but agreed to the terms of the consent order with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to fulfill our commitment to continually provide ever-better service to our customers.”

And your kid promises to do their homework on time, as well.

[Image: Toyota]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Toyota #crime #Dealerships #HighFinance

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 21 comments

Peter on Nov 22, 2023

No biggie just add another $60 million to Toyota’s $225 Billion debt pile. #Worlds most indebted company.

1 Reply
- Analoggrotto on Nov 23, 2023
  
  Totally a good reason to switch to Hyundai Kia for a healthier company serving higher ATPs.
  
  Like
Dukeisduke on Nov 27, 2023

A rare black eye for Toyota. I'd expect shenanigans from the dealer's F&I office - I experienced them when I bought my then-new 2013 Tacoma (and paid cash for it) eleven years ago, but I expect more from a corporate finance arm.

Have they been hiring people from Wells Fargo?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars