NTSB, NHTSA Investigating Ford BlueCruise Fatal Crashes

by Michael Strong

Published: March 11th, 2026

ntsb nhtsa investigating ford bluecruise fatal crashes

Two crashes involving vehicles using Ford’s semi-autonomous driving technology, BlueCruise, are the subject of a March 31 hearing by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

The public board meeting aims to “determine the probable causes” of two crashes. They involve 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E electric vehicles crashing into stationary vehicles while traveling at highway speeds. The collisions happened in San Antonio and Philadelphia.

Ford officials were unable to respond to TTAC requests for comment before publication.

“During the meeting, NTSB board members will discuss safety issues related to these crashes and vote on the probable causes and safety recommendations designed to prevent similar crashes in the future,” the agency said in a release.

The San Antonio crash happened Feb. 24, 2024 about 9:50 p.m. According to the NTSB report, the 2022 Mustang Mach-E was traveling on Interstate 10 when it hit a stationary 1999 Honda CR-V, causing it to overturn. The 56-year-old driver of the Honda was killed while the Ford driver sustained minor injuries.

“A witness who had been traveling in the center lane of eastbound I-10 in front of the Ford reported that she encountered the stopped Honda in the center lane and that the vehicle’s tail or hazard lights were not illuminated. The witness changed lanes to the right to avoid striking the vehicle and later, in her rearview mirror, saw another vehicle strike the stopped Honda,” according to the case file.

On March 3, 2024, a 2022 Mustang Mach-E was in the left lane on I-95 in Philadelphia and struck the rear of a 2012 Hyundai Elantra, which then hit the rear of a 2006 Toyota Prius. Both were stopped in the travel lane of the freeway. Those vehicles hit a passing Toyota Corolla. The drivers of the two stationary vehicles died while the Corolla driver was unhurt. The Mach-E driver suffered minor injuries.

According to the NTSB report, “The vehicle was equipped with advanced driver assistance systems, including those providing partial automation capabilities that Ford refers to as “BlueCruise.” Vehicle-based data indicated that the vehicle’s 23-year-old driver was using BlueCruise as it approached mile marker 26.8.”

The NTSB isn’t the only federal agency examining these incidents. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has an open investigation on 2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E models due to the same to crashes. After a preliminary query, the agency expanded it to cover 2021-2024 Mustang Mach-E SUVs equipped with BlueCruise.

Investigators found there have been 32 crashes and 2,004 “non-crash reports” tied to the technology. They also found that Ford’s Adaptive Cruise Control is designed to “inhibit any response to reported stationary objects when the subject vehicle’s approach speed is at or above 62 mph. Additionally, system performance may be limited when there is poor visibility due to insufficient illumination.” Both crashes being investigated by the NTSB meet those conditions.

[Images: NTSB, Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#NTSB #NHTSA #fordbluecruise #Fordcrashes #FordNTSBhearing #BlueCruisecrash

Michael Strong

Michael Strong has spent more than 25 years writing about the automotive industry. A Detroit-area native, he’s written about everything from local car shows to product reviews to financial news. Currently he writes and edits for a variety of national and local publications. He’s also a longtime member of the Automotive Press Association and the International Motor Press Association, and a graduate of Georgia Southern University. Hail Southern! Despite a love for ’70s land yachts and BMWs from the late ’80s and early ’90s, his personal vehicle is neither of those.

More by Michael Strong

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 11 comments

Parkave231 on Mar 11, 2026
This reminds me of a question I've never been able to figure out. I'm not passing judgement on the result -- my overly-analytical brain is just trying to compare two events that might not be comparable after all:

These two accidents in this article involve collisions of a stationary vehicle and a second travelling at a high rate of speed. One result of this is news about, and an investgation into BlueCruise, with generally no mention of the design of the vehicles hit.

My brain, for whatever reason, is trying to compare and contrast this with the Ford Panther issues several years back. Everyone seemed to be entirely focused on the *stationary* vehicle in this case, and how the design flaw of (IIRC) a bolt in the differential housing puncturing the gas tank absolutely needed to be mitigated with a retrofitted shield. Notwithstanding the shield At the same time, I don't remember hearing much about the survivability of a rear-end collision by another vehicle moving at, say, 60 mph.

Now let me be clear -- these BlueCruise incidents should absolutely be investigated with a focus on that software. But at the same time, the questions I have are:
1. Notwithstanding any fire issues, what is the actual expecation of survivability in a stationary vehicle involved in a high-speed collision from behind; and
2. What was specifically different about the Panther issue? Was it perhaps focused more on the fire aspect, as maybe you could survive the initial collision but be absolutely screwed by a fire? Was it the fact that the issue could be relatively simply and cheaply mitigated -- i.e. there's no specific factor to be fixed on a CR-V, but the Panthers could be beefed up easily?
1 Reply
- EBFlexing on ur mom on Mar 11, 2026
  
  ”What was specifically different about the Panther issue?”
  The biggest difference is that it wasn’t software launching vehicles into the back of the Crown Vic.
  
  1
Verbal on Mar 11, 2026

Darwinism in action.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars