Nissan’s 2025 Earnings Outlook is Black — On an Adjusted Basis
The old adage that you can’t cut your way to profitability doesn’t apply to Nissan apparently as the Japanese automaker revised its 2025 fiscal year earnings forecast from a $377 million loss to a $314 million operating profit by cutting and controlling costs and favorable exchange rates.
The company’s 2025 fiscal year ended March 31, 2026, and Nissan’s full year results will be released May 13.
The company expects its full year revenue to be slightly higher than previously predicted, moving from $74.7 billion up to $75.3 billion. However, the company is still going to be in the red, but less so, predicting a full-year net loss $3.45 billion compared to the $4.1 billion originally forecast, reported Automotive News.
Officials also noted that automotive free cash flow is expected to be positive in the second half, as planned. Automotive net cash is forecasted to exceed $6.3 billion at year‑end, reflecting a strong cash position.
“The improvement mainly reflects a one-time positive impact from changes to U.S. emissions regulations, along with ongoing cost reductions and favorable foreign exchange effects,” officials said in a release.
Nissan noted the company’s global sales fell during the fiscal year by 4.2 percent compared to previous period, including a 7 percent drop in March. The company took its biggest hit in Japan where sales fell 13.5 percent. Overall outside Japan, sales fell 2.7 percent, with Mexico being the big exception where sales rose 6.8 percent. Other positive results came in Canada and China.
Nissan’s at the start of a three-year recovery plan implemented by new CEO Ivan Espinosa. Dubbed “Re: Nissan,” it’s counting using AI to refocus its global vehicle portfolio, which is going to shrink from 56 vehicles to 45 vehicles. The company plans to eliminate the “low performers” from its lineup in the near term.
While AI is central to Nissan’s plans to continue its recovery, how it plans to deliver product to buyers centers on new portfolio approach with four categories or models: Heartbeat, Core, Growth, and Partner.
[Images: Nissan]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Michael Strong has spent more than 25 years writing about the automotive industry. A Detroit-area native, he’s written about everything from local car shows to product reviews to financial news. Currently he writes and edits for a variety of national and local publications. He’s also a longtime member of the Automotive Press Association and the International Motor Press Association, and a graduate of Georgia Southern University. Hail Southern! Despite a love for ’70s land yachts and BMWs from the late ’80s and early ’90s, his personal vehicle is neither of those.
More by Michael Strong
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
""The company took its biggest hit in Japan where sales fell 13.5 percent.""
That says a lot about the utter lack of enthusiasm for the ENTIRE portfolio, not just the tiny US markets. Cutting models will not solve that.
Cost-cutting isn't necessarily a bad thing if done on the right things such as underutilized manufacturing capacity, too many models/platform which don't ROI, etc.
The thing is still to invest in new products/components (and make sure those bets pay off), which is something "Le Cost Cutter" Ghosn failed to do, leaving Nissan (and even more so Infiniti) in a precarious state.
“Good post But if you want a deeper version of this news with the latest updates, you can check XenixNews — they usually have clear and updated information.”