More Evidence That Ram Is Working On Smaller Pickup Emerges

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Despite being the dedicated truck brand for Stellantis, Ram effectively only sells one full-size pickup in a myriad of flavors and configurations and the ProMaster van. Meanwhile, its rivals have correctly identified that there was a large hole in the North American market that could only be plugged with small, affordable trucks — leaving Ram to play catch up.


Ram hasn't had a modestly sized pickup since ending production of the Dakota (top of the page) in 2010. But we’ve been hearing for years that the company was believed to be in the process of providing an answer to the Ford Ranger, Toyota Tacoma, and Chevrolet Colorado. Rumors have also been circulating that Ram has been working on a response to the successful Ford Maverick. But things have been relatively quiet since Stellantis took over, at least until the last couple of weeks.


During the Detroit Auto Show, Ram CEO Tim Kuniskis dropped some incredibly direct hints to Road & Track that something is being worked on behind the scenes.


“I think we can grow more in our sub-$55,000 price point, because I used to have [the Ram Classic] and I don’t have that [truck] anymore,” Kuniskis explained. “I'm doing some interesting stuff down there with Tradesmans and Warlocks and stuff like that, but I need to do more there. I need a mid-size truck for sure."

"We’re a truck brand and we don’t have a compact, we don’t have a mid-size. Kinda disingenuous to call me a truck brand, isn’t it?” the CEO continued. "So yeah, I need that. I want that, I need that. I’m not telling you that I am going to have it in six months, but I desperately want it, and there is a market for it.”


From Road & Track:


The recently-unretired executive was quick to point to the success that competitive brands have had in the mid-size and compact truck segments, which only continues to grow in the United States. Those represent a massive number of potential conquest customers for Stellantis, if it can solidify its position.
“If I look at Toyota, they’re doing over 200,000 Tacomas a year. Ford’s doing close to 200,000 between the Maverick and the Ranger,” said Kuniskis. “GM’s doing around 140,000 between GMC and Chevy. There’s a clear, obvious market there that I want to go after. That’s just plus business to [Ram dealers] since they haven’t had that since Dakota.”

While nobody has officially confirmed that the automaker is developing something smaller than the 1500, the reality of the situation is that the company is already building them for other markets.


In Mexico, customers disinclined to purchase a full-size pickup have the option of selecting from two smaller models. The Ram 1200 (above) is a midsize that was previously based on the Mitsubishi Triton and currently exists as a rebadged Peugeot Landtrek or Fiat Titano.


Meanwhile, the pint-sized Ram 700 (below) is based on the subcompact Fiat Strada. It does a modest amount of business in Mexico and has seen increasing sales volumes. But the real success story is how well it has performed in Brazil — where the Strada can reliably expect to sell over 100,000 units annually.

Either truck could be repurposed for our market to compete in their respective segments and that seems like the likely play for Stellantis. However, the company has had mixed success in regard to this in the past. Despite being a relatively enjoyable vehicle to drive, the Dodge Hornet (AKA Alfa Romeo Tonale) hasn’t done much business for the company and is being heavily discounted in an effort to get customers interested.


That said, badge-engineering is pretty commonplace within the industry and has been for years. Sadly, even the objectively good examples have sometimes struggled with success. For example, the Pontiac Vibe was just a General Motors-Toyota NUMMI collaboration building an Americanized Corolla/Matrix in the early 2000s. But it never saw the same volumes as the original and ended up flying under the radar for the kind of shoppers that would have appreciated it. Around the same time, GM was also selling Holden performance vehicles in North America (e.g. Chevrolet SS and Pontiac GTO) that enthusiasts agreed were phenomenal. But they didn’t stay in production for very long.


The assumption is that badge-engineered vehicles (even those coming from within the same parent company) dilutes the image of a brand. Rather than building a vehicle of their own for a specific type of customer, they’re repurposing a vehicle from elsewhere. But there’s so many global market vehicles and brand consolidation in the present era, not to mention platform/component sharing and competitor collaboration, that it seems sort of silly for people to care when there’s a possibility of ending up with a better product for less money.


Kuniskis suggested that Ram needs to first focus on maintaining production of in-demand 1500 examples, specifically RHO (below) and Tungsten models. But hinted that a smaller pickup could become Ram’s priority once sport-truck allocations had been dealt with — noting that the dealerships were being pretty vocal about what they wanted to see from the company.

“That’s on us, we gotta fix it,” stated Kuniskis. “So at a base level, at an absolute step one, I gotta get back to the volume that they were at, because they’re set up for that volume. Quite frankly, we’re set up for that volume. So we gotta get back to that volume.”


As awesome as the Ram RHO is at bombing over hills and catching some air, America’s preference for modern full-size pickups seems like it could be waning. Luxury and sport trucks carrying high price tags remain popular. But some customers seeking workhorse vehicles are turning away, as larger pickups become more expensive to purchase and difficult to maintain. There’s a clear appetite for models that are easy to service and come with lower MSRPs.


But Stellantis no longer offers the older-generation Ram Classic (below) and has likewise failed to offer something that can compete with the smaller pickups of its core rivals. Practically everyone that matters is already selling midsize and compact pickups — save for Ram, which is supposed to be Stellantis’ dedicated truck brand.


Kuniskis is obviously aware of this and has historically had a handle on what the American market needs. The real question is whether or not Stellantis is willing to facilitate what’s required to make Ram competitive in regard to the smaller pickup segments it’s presently leaving for the competition. Considering how late the brand will be to offer something up, relative to its rivals, the resulting Ram product(s) will either need to trade on superior value or be so well designed that they’re effectively just better than what’s being offered elsewhere.

[Images: Stellantis]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 49 comments
  • Joe Turnes Joe Turnes on Jun 05, 2025

    For SURE will not be available as TWO door, let alone as an affordable base model without touch screens, p/w, etc.

  • D D on Jun 05, 2025

    To the Auto Industry:

    I drive what I consider to be a monster sized, meaning huge by historical standards, Ram 1500 EcoDiesel. Despite its comfort, features and great reliability, I absolutely hate it. I love driving it and I love towing with it on major highways. But I still hate it. Its just too frigging big. An aircraft carrier has a shorter turning radius. It size and huge turning radius makes it difficult to manipulate in close quarters. Making a U-turn requires a road of four lanes. I've never driven a vehicle so hard to turn and maneuver around a campground or marina.


    I did not want to buy a giant truck. I wanted a mid sized Durango or Frontier size truck with a reasonable turning radius, like my Frontier had, like my Jeep had, like my Xtera had. I just want a smaller truck with high cargo and tow capacity. Nobody makes one. None of the compact or mid-sized trucks have the frames and underpinnings that would allow it to tow 10,000 lbs. Cargo capacity in these things can be laughably low. I've seen numbers as low as 900 pounds -- on a new optioned out "pickup" shaped vehicle. They are nearly useless to me.


    Why doesn't anyone make a reasonably sized SUV and pickup truck that can tow 10,000 lbs and carry 1700 lbs without every option (including 4wd) being deleted to save weight? I wanted a heavy duty SUV. But nobody, nobody, makes a real heavy duty SUV... Remember the 2500 and 3500 Suburbans?


    Why is it in 2005 I was able to tow a 6500 pound camper with my Dodge Durango Limited, one with a heavy duty tow package and low gearing, but I have to buy a huge truck today?


    If someone builds a small optioned up truck that costs $40,000 (max), has 4wd, can tow 10,000 lbs and carry at least 1,500 and I will be trading in my '21 Ram Pigup.



  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next