Kia EV9 Powertrains Revealed, High Performance Variant Coming in 2025

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While the Kia EV9’s existence isn’t news, the manufacturer has released the all-important details regarding powertrains and they really span the gamut.

From the sound of things, you’ll be able to have the standard version of the all-electric SUV optioned to be unsatisfyingly slow or surprisingly quick. It all depends on how much you’re willing to spend and your sensibilities as a driver. However, news has also broken that Kia is developing a high-performance GT model that’s slated to arrive in 2025.


Though you would also have to decide whether you would want a juiced-up SUV that’s effectively the same size as the Kia Telluride. At 197.2 inches long, 78.0 inches wide, and 69.1 inches tall, it’s hard not to make direct comparisons. But the EV9 should have more interior space (figures are being kept secret) thanks to the e-GMP electric platform creating a much longer wheelbase and flatter floor. Still, it’s a big vehicle and you’ll have to ask yourself how crazy you want the performance to be.


That said, we might advise against the Standard rear-wheel-drive setup that features a single electric motor mounted on the back axle. The configuration yields a maximum output of 214 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque, which would be lovely to have on a much smaller vehicle. Kia said the model (which is limited to the smaller 77.6-kWh battery pack) can breeze through 62 mph in 8.2 seconds. Not great, though faster than some of us would have guessed.

The Long Range model increases range by utilizing a larger 99.8-kWh battery (estimated at 336 miles on the wildly forgiving European WLTP cycle) and further culling the power to help maximize its operating area between charges. As this model will also be heavier due to the bigger battery, Kia suggests the 201 horsepower the trim has been limited to is only good enough to get you to 62 mph in 9.4 seconds on flat, level ground.


Kia’s EV9 GT-Line likewise comes with the larger battery. But the company hasn’t said what that will translate to in terms of range. Unlike its siblings, it comes as a dual-motor setup with power being delivered front and rear for a combined 379 horsepower and 442 pound-feet of torque. The manufacturer is also offering it with a boost mode that can temporarily deliver more torque.. When everything is going your way, the system should be capable of hitting 62 mph in 5.3 seconds.

Car and Driver has also reported the company is working on a high-performance variant utilizing the same powertrain from the EV6 GT – which utilizes a 576-hp dual-motor setup. The car is slated to arrive sometime in 2025, without outlet speculating on its potential based on what we already know about the EV6:


A special green "GT" button on the wheel unlocks the full range of chaos in the GT, giving drivers access to blisteringly quick acceleration. How quick? The one we tested hit 60 mph in as little as 3.2 seconds. Of course, the heavier EV9 GT likely won't be quite as quick. However, it could adopt other hardware found exclusively on its EV6 counterpart, such as its eLSD that can overdrive the outside rear wheel in corners, improving agility and giving the machine a more rear-drive demeanor. Adaptive dampers, upgraded brakes, and a set of summer tires like those found on the EV6 could also be part of the mix.
Unfortunately, the added performance benefits that come along with the EV9 GT are likely to result in the same issues as the EV6 GT. While Kia boosted the available power in that car, it stuck with the same 77.4-kWh battery pack, which led to its estimated range to drop to 206 miles. So, expect the mighty GT to have the shortest range in the EV9 family.

Regardless, it should still possess the 800-volt electrical architecture that the rest of the EV9 lineup has and probably needs. With the range of these vehicles looking serviceable for most errands and less-than-ideal for a road trip, ensuring they can quickly charge with help from the right charging stations will be important. Kia claims the largest EV9 battery can take on about 148 miles of range in about 15 minutes.


While that’s about 14 minutes longer than any comparable gasoline car, this is a pretty big battery we’re talking about. So, in the world of all-electric vehicles, this represents a modest victory.


Everything else Kia had to offer this week pertained to how the company wanted to up its game in terms of driver assistance technologies. Currently, the brand said it would be working on a Highway Driving Pilot that'll allow Level 3 autonomous driving in certain situations and is reliant on lidar. We’ve been less than impressed with a lot of modern driving assistance packages (though some features are nice) and would prefer not to celebrate before someone can offer reliable SAE Level 4.

Level 3 will still force you to pay constant attention while the vehicle acts as though it’s doing most of the driving for you. It’s basically like asking someone to be ready for anything as you’re tucking them into bed and makes little sense to your author as a valid safety feature. The EV9 is also coming with park assist and numerous phone-based features that you can unlock via subscription through Kia Connect Store.


That’s another black stain for the vehicle. With the exception of multimedia, there are very few features that seem like they should be attached to monthly subscriptions – especially if the hardware is already equipped to the vehicle. But we don’t yet know what the brand is offering and will save our full ire for future updates.


Kia has said the 2024 EV9 lineup will go on sale in the United States in the second half of this year. While pricing has yet to be announced, leaked details suggest they’ll start around $55,000 and easily crest $70,000 if you’re going for the GT-Line. Your guess is as good as ours on the high-performance model, however.

[Images: Kia]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 15 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 30, 2023

    @Matt Posky: This may surprise you, but I agree with your criticisms is this story.


    This vehicle has the look and weight of the Telluride, but without the right chops. A vehicle like this is intended to be a great highway cruiser loaded up with all the stuff one takes on a trip - not a 0-60 racer.


    My former Sedona (RIP, sniff) had a great blend of space, power, and towing capacity. It was lovely for countless road trips, but it was a ponderous commuter.


    The EV9 won't make a great road trip car due to its short range, and it is too hulking to make sense as a commuter. They should have fitted a 150 - 200 kWh battery so it could at least go some distance, and that might justify the bulk.


    No way I'd go in for ~$60k for this vehicle.

    • Matt Posky Matt Posky on Mar 31, 2023


      I don't want to be too mean before I've learned more about it and seen it in action. But I think the world will agree with us whenever an EV like this comes out.

  • Stellantis Guy Stellantis Guy on Mar 30, 2023

    "creating a much longer wheelbase" Mmmmm...

  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
  • Pwrwrench IIRC the most efficient version of the CRX was not sold in California, due to the "tune" of the 50+ mpg engine not meeting the emissions standards. The ones sold in California were rated in the upper 40s.Also, nearly all of these that I saw in SoCal were red, except for a few white ones.
Next