Rental Review: 2024 Chevrolet Trax LT

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In the year 2024 - a strange world foreign to anyone old enough to remember Zima - the Chevrolet Trax is a full-size car.

I was informed of this jarring fact by my local Hertz agent.

"Gosh! Is self-identification at work here, or is there some type of science to back all of this up?" I wondered.



Seems the good folks at Hertz looked at the second-generation Trax's interior volume and legroom, compared it to the various Malibus they had sitting on the lot, and, taking into consideration the Trax's front-drive-only layout, bestowed GM's lowest-cost crossover with a size rating befitting an Impala (RIP).

For sure, my late father's unloved 2013 Trax could only dream of such status. And with good reason, as that stumpy phonebooth-perched-on-a-skateboard was everything the new Trax isn't.

Low-income Americans and returning GM buyers express their collective thanks for that.

I'll admit to being oddly curious about the big-ified Trax since it returned - rather unexpectedly - for the '24 model year. In my travels through the U.S., it's clear the longer, lower, wider, vastly better-looking second-gen model isn't having trouble finding buyers, especially in the flyover areas outside major urban centers. And so, with a week off work and an old college buddy's seaside home beckoning, there could be only one vehicle worthy of a cross-country shakedown cruze. 

Er, cruise.

And what better guy to put this thing through its paces, I thought? Yours truly has found himself behind the wheel of a low-end GM car for the majority of his adult life, and in the backseat for a not-insignificant part of his childhood. The current uninterrupted GM ownership streak began in 2008. Call me conservative, call me cheap, call me a dinosaur clinging desperately to a long-gone Western culture in which Detroit was king and foreign cars were built for ants, but low-rung offerings from Chevrolet have, more often than not, proved themselves profoundly livable vehicles.

Low purchase costs (*especially* used), cheap maintenance, mainly reliable drivetrains, decent suspensions, so-so brakes, piles of front legroom, and reasonable power and gas mileage were their virtues. Audiences used to line up for a taste.

Settling into the new Trax for the 930-mile jaunt east, cursing the mid-rung LT's drab light grey metallic paint all the while, I took stock of my new surroundings. At first blush? Classy, especially for a vehicle with a U.S. MSRP of $22,300 (a base LS starts at a mouth-watering $20,400). 

Two-tone dash and door finishes of varying surface textures, faux leather seating with cloth inserts, a broad 11-inch touchscreen with digital gauge cluster, and jet nozzle air vents (with blue accents) flanking it all, the Trax makes a good first impression. Yet, so do lots of people who ultimately prove impossible to live with. How does the relationship feel a week later? In this case, a few cracks formed immediately.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - the elimination of the handbrake hasn't done the elbows and knees of America any favors. The tall and fairly wide center console in the Trax will surely intrude into the hiproom of those not built like a pool noodle, and slightly impede access to the shifter for those who sit far back and low, as I do. My elbow suffered repeated blows while attempting to buckle up. And while the off-the-shelf six-speed automatic's shifter surrounds itself in always-dusty yet superficially elegant piano back, the console itself seems constructed of the cheapest possible pebbled plastic. Look to the upper doors for more of that. Sure, it's no one's idea of an expensive car, but how about a console lid that hinges on the side for easier access, and a bit of a softer one, too?

Of course, that lid is plusher than a kitten's behind when compared to the door armrests, which come close to 'coconut-shattering' on the hardness scale. Costs must be kept down in order to slot something below the Trailblazer in the Chevy lineup, sure, but these are easy issues to fix - especially when you consider the amount of content this Trax had on tap.

While base models feature a stripped-down suite of niceties, the volume LT comes standard with adaptive cruise, lane hold with lane departure warning, proximity warning, blind spot monitoring, HD backup camera with rear cross-traffic alert, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity, single-zone climate control with A/C, among lesser accoutrements. Hardly a stripper. There's even a volume knob for the audio system, though with its lofty placement you'll have to dodge both the wheel and the wiper stalk to access it. 

The Trax's main saving grace? Room! Despite pushing 6'4", this driver could extend his legs and not touch the pedals with the driver's seat in its rearmost position. Even with that chair positioned for my comfort, my knees didn't come close to the seatback after scrambling into the rear bench. Backseat passengers will enjoy a flat floor and excellent legroom for the car's class; just forget about a center armrest, map pockets, or anything beyond a couple of device plug-ins. Behind that row, I learned there's plenty of room for multiple rifles and shotguns, as well as luggage.

I vacation prepared, obviously.

As the trip wore on and speeds gradually entered the scan-for-cops range, I couldn't help being surprised at the diminutive 1.2-litre turbo three-cylinder's ability to mask its lack of displacement. It's no GT off the line, though you can easily squawk the tires. At speed, however, the tranny displays an eagerness to drop a gear with barely any additional throttle input, greatly improving the car's responsiveness. Rated for 28 mpg city, 32 highway, and 30 combined, my highway-heavy trip returned 32 mpg - comparable to its subcompact crossover competitors, but still below the consumption enjoyed by the former Cruze owners this vehicle so obviously targets. One wonders what the old 1.4-liter turbo four from the Cruze could have managed in this application.

Ah, the Cruze.

Like the hazy memories of a long-lost love, thoughts of the 2018 Cruze I had sitting back at home constantly inserted itself into the driving experience.

"Those door switches and handles look awfully familiar," I thought. "What else showed up from the estate sale?"

Luckily, not the steering! My main Cruze gripe is the steering's miniscule on-center dead zone, which results in constant minor corrections at highway speed. Not a trace in the Trax, thankfully.

Overall, the ride just felt familiar. Someone in Korea clearly pressed the 'Standard GM' button when it came time to tune the suspension. There's considerable more ground clearance on this rig (7.3 inches), but cornering was flat (not Macan flat, obviously), bumps were handled with an amount of aplomb befitting a slightly more expensive vehicle, and no audible rattles or vibrations intruded into the ever-present road noise (caused partially by the ICE tires this thing wore, despite 90-degree temps. Thanks, Hertz!). Suspension travel might be the only difference between the two vehicle's squishy bits. This isn't a vehicle one buys to power aggressively through tight curves, clearly, so such observations aren't worth much.

So, does the Trax fulfill the GM promise of decent content offered at an affordable price? Undoubtedly, and it does so while looking better and more substantial than its competitors. The Trax also offers more rear seat legroom and cargo volume than the FWD-only Nissan Kicks and Hyundai Venue, despite costing just $400 more than the Venue in base form, and a grand less than the Kicks. Both of those rides fail to measure up on the power scale, too.

With 137 horsepower and 162 lb-ft on tap, the Trax kicks sand in the face of both the Venue (121 hp, 113 lb-ft) and Kicks (122 hp, 114 lb-ft), while wowing their girlfriends with added inches. The Trax's external dimensions emasculates both cars, and even outsizes its Trailblazer stablemate. There's a further 9.5 inches stem to stern compared to the Kicks, and it boasts a whopping 19.5 inches on the Venue. Food for thought. This is also a car with a hood flat and long enough to see from inside - great for me, as I like to feel like the captain of a ship.

Could I live with the Trax? Sure - a set of decent winter tires makes this an all-season rig in most locales (though I question that massive driver-side wiper's ability to clear wet, heavy snow). Plus, foam padding is a cheap buy at Lowes. Will the Trax continue to burn up the subcompact sales charts, giving the yuppiemobile Subaru Crosstrek a run for its money? Undoubtedly, unless a long-term reliability issue crops up to give the Trax a run-don't-walk reputation.

I don't know what the hell GM is doing with the rest of its lineup, but the Trax shows that the company hasn't forgotten where it's been. Maybe it can help it figure out where to go.

[Images © 2024 Steph Willems/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 32 comments
  • Akear Akear on Oct 15, 2024
    The US content for the Trax is around 15% It is simply not an American vehicle. Korea has made better vehicles than this
  • Dan Dan on Dec 14, 2024
    I own a 2025 Trax 1RS. If this car remains reliable (it should-its cousin trailblazer is 4 years old now), it will be an OUTSTANDING value. The car is very, very nice.
  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next