Why Do All The Hot Girls Want Old SUVs?

Michael Accardi
by Michael Accardi
Image: Maryralph Bradley

Is this peak automotive absurdity?


For decades, making more money meant you could buy your way into better engineering and more refinement—at the very least, an air conditioning system that actually works. If you really wanted people to know you made it, you leased a Mercedes to insulate yourself from everyone who drove a domestic.


Now, the new money wants the exact opposite: expensive, noisy inconvenience, yet somehow repackaged as a lifestyle prop for the social media feed.


The Wall Street Journal recently learned that younger, affluent, hot girls are walking away from modern luxury to drop absurd sums on ancient, throwback, off-road SUVs. Take the 28-year-old in England who spent $16,500 on a 1994 Jeep Wrangler YJ.


“Those EV cars, they’ll run you over because you can’t even hear them,” said Lucy Matthews, 28, who lives in Manchester. She says people look at her in a 90s Jeep and think:" That’s a cool girl, driving a cool car."

Image: Jeep

Another influencer in Los Angeles admits to spending $100,000 on a 1995 Mercedes-Benz 230GE soft-top. These trucks aren't machines anymore; they’re tokens valued for their image rather than their function as an object— mere backdrops meant to signal a casual, effortless life that requires breathless effort and six figures to pull off.


Naturally, the shops are laughing all the way to the bank, reporting massive surges in buyers willing to pay six figures for a vintage Land Rover Defender or a restomodded Ford Bronco. Hagerty says it has seen an 80% surge in women under 50 who bought Broncos from the ’60s and ’70s.


The marketing pitch is that these old trucks show you have more "edge" than the girl driving something new. “An older Jeep seems very fun and girly to me, whereas a new Jeep is just not as cool,” one 20-year-old content creator from Florida was quoted as saying— but she drives a 2000 Jeep Sahara her parents bought for her.


There's even a notion going around that these vintage trucks subtly signal wealth because they're expensive to maintain. Funnier than the article itself are all the self-proclaimed car guys in the comments of the original WSJ article simping out advice to the hot girls. I want to scoff, but then I can't help but think, is this really more ridiculous than people buying used Toyota RAV4s for more than MSRP, or old men spending six figures on a Plymouth 'Cuda?


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.


Michael Accardi
Michael Accardi

An experienced automotive storyteller known for engaging and insightful content. Michael also brings a wealth of technical knowledge and experience having been part of the Ford GT program at Multimatic and built cars that raced in TCR, IMSA, and IndyCar.

More by Michael Accardi

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • The138732094 The138732094 on Aug 02, 2026

    They are recycling, all good!

  • Tom170698702 Tom170698702 on Sep 14, 2026

    This has got to be the third or fourth time I have seen this article. What's wrong with coming up with new Info?

  • Oberkanone Dacia makes product line of affordable vehicles. An entire product line. One vehicle is not the answer for all needs. Dacia does affordable well.
  • YaMoBeThere This is an egregiously bad AI generated article, the middle of the article is repeated twice... but yea go ahead and nitpick about my comment pointing that out
  • Slavuta Is this Ok if I use OEM all weather floor mats? Yes, the ones that came with 2011 Mazda3 were not good. But the ones in 2017 Mazda6 are excellent. BTW, in that picture, Grand Cherokee on Kumho tires. Is this also an advert or just coincidence?
  • Bar170111344 "GM was on track to spend $31.7 billion on compliance technology through 2031."I'll just mention, that expenditure would have gone into research and development, and that would have driven U.S. manufacturing innovation. On the industrial side, R&D is necessary for U.S. manufacturers to remain competitive in the world. It's absolutely no surprise China is running rings around us. The prospective $ savings GM is looking forward to hasn't impressed the stock market. Year-to-date return of -5.65%. -7.05% in the last month. PE 20:1, inflated by the falling share price. Not to be insulting by any stretch, but it has never been like Mary Barra to get out ahead of anything. She's not an innovator and not a risk taker. She's a good engineer.Honestly - in that industry, which I worked in for decades, being regulated is like having a security blanket. You can be mediocre, blame it on regulation, and still make a buck. And with the federal government now digging an even deeper moat around GM and Ford, it's clearly suppressing American innovation and excellence.
  • Jks168824641 Mercedes, 2023 GLC 300’s start/stop feature is so smooth and seamless that I hardly notice it. I really appreciate it in slow traffic or drive through lanes for fast food
Next