Study Claims Gen Z Doesn't Like Buying Cars
Younger drivers have reportedly had it with the dealership experience, with Gen Z even more disenfranchised than Millennials. Though it’s difficult to imagine anybody visiting a showroom within the last 12 months having any other reaction. Incentives are down, prices are up, and there’s a good chance whatever you wanted to buy isn’t going to be on the lot anyway. Someone saying they had an exemplary dealer experience is becoming about as common as people claiming they enjoy going to the DMV.
However, CDK Global Inc. still opted to conduct a survey in the hopes of determining just how much less tolerant younger shoppers might be compared to older generations. The takeaway probably isn’t going to shock you, even if the sheer volume of first-time buyers that don’t care for dealerships might.
The study, which was released on Thursday and subsequently shared by Automotive News, polled 1,100 recent car buyers in December 2021 and analyzed their preferences and hardships during the car-buying process — breaking down the results by age. CDK classified Gen Z as car buyers from the ages of 18 to 25, Millennials as 25 to 40, Gen X as 40 to 55, and Baby Boomers as individuals aged 56 and over.
From AN:
CDK said 81 percent of Gen Z members said their biggest priority when purchasing a car was taking their time and exploring all of their options, compared with only 73 percent of millennials, 60 percent of Gen Xers and only 45 percent of baby boomers. The survey also said members of Gen Z had more difficulty purchasing a vehicle online than older generations.
Brendan Dougherty, CDK’s director of product marketing, attributed this trend to 56 percent of Gen Z respondents telling CDK that they were making their first car purchase.
“For most of these consumers, this is their first major purchase, and they come in with some assumptions that they could do more of this thing online than what they really can do, because of the complexity of a car transaction,” Dougherty told Automotive News.
Luxury vehicles were also more popular among Gen Z, according to the survey, with 39 percent of buyers purchasing a luxury car compared with 27 percent of Gen X buyers and 12 percent of baby boomers.
That’s rather interesting since we know that Millennials hold almost 7 percent of the nation’s wealth today. By contrast, Boomers held 22 percent of the national wealth at the same age based on data provided by the Federal Reserve. Considering that this trend is presumed to expand over time, one would assume that Gen Z would be in even worse financial shape — not to mention having less time on Earth to accrue their finances. But it’s no secret that a lot of people purchase cars that are well out of their price range.
While your author would argue that the majority of today’s luxury vehicles aren’t really offering more bang for the proverbial buck than in past eras, marketing still makes them out to be a cut above their mainstream peers, and loan terms have expanded to a point where it’s not uncommon to see people paying a vehicle off for at least 70 months. Another possible explanation is that a majority of young adults (18-29) now live at home with their parents, even if they’re gainfully employed. By avoiding rent or mortgage payments, there’s a chance that a subset of Gen Z simply has more disposable income and has elected to throw that money at premium marques.
Regardless, the big takeaway from the study was that Gen Z doesn’t actually seem to like the process required to get into a new car and is far less likely to own one — be it fancy or humble. Almost half (45 percent) of Gen Z respondents told CDK they were frustrated by having to wait for a salesperson when going to a dealership and were the least likely age group to recommend any dealership to a friend or family member. The group likewise wanted to have a comprehensive understanding of their options over older individuals and took more time out of their week before making a final decision.
“[Gen Z] said that they wanted someone to help them, they wanted to take their time, but they also still valued speed,” explained Dougherty.
CDK basically exists to figure out ways of making the automotive sector money and often works directly with dealerships, so there’s some reason to believe the survey isn’t another attempt to undermine the dealer model so automakers can commence direct sales. Joe Tautges, chief operating officer of CDK Global, suggested dealers might benefit from streamlining the buying process while taking additional time to work directly with a customer to help them understand features while catering to their specific needs. But the company also works with manufacturers that seem to be advancing direct sales, so take all of the above with a grain of salt.
There are a lot of factors to consider here. Younger generations are not incurring the kind of wealth their parents did at the same stages of life, so big purchases have a lot more riding on them. We’ve already seen this with the housing market becoming prohibitively expensive after 2006. The number of renters living in the U.S. continued to climb while homeownership rates stayed relatively stagnant.
Vehicles have likewise grown substantially more cash-intensive over the last couple of years, forcing some people to spend more on a vehicle they can afford — rather than the one they actually wanted. This alone may be all there is to Gen Z having a lower tolerance for visits to the dealership and spending more time browsing for cars — with the issue potentially made worse by the current situation, where options are comparatively limited and haggling has nearly gone out the window.
Ultimately, these kinds of studies feel extremely familiar to the ones we saw for years citing that Millennials were buying fewer cars than their parents had. We’re just further down the path now, with the average American having even less economic freedom than before. The obvious solution is to get more money into the pockets of regular people to deliver a healthier and more stable automotive market. Something tells me the days of being able to overcharge customers are about to come to an end. But it has also historically been a lot easier to talk about fixing a broken market than actually getting the job done.
[Image: Gretchen Gunda Enger/Shutterstock]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
Why should we put up with the same problems imposed upon society for literal generations when there is a better way? Why pay for cable TV when we can get entertainment on our schedule and practically free of charge?
Between several friends and neighbors who have Gen Z kids going to college, they all hate cars. They want nothing to do with cars. They all want to move to cities that have mass transit, even if they don't like everything else that comes with large cities.