Stellantis Shakeup: Chrysler Boss Chris Feuell Steps Down, Replaced By Matt McAlear

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Chrysler CEO Chris Feuell has stepped down.


Feuell, who has led the Chrysler brand since 2021, leaves for personal reasons. Her departure is effective immediately.

Dodge head honcho Matt McAlear will take over. McAlear has led Dodge since 2024.

McAlear will remain in charge of Dodge and also take over Alfa Romeo's North American operations. He's been with Stellantis in various roles for 13 years.

How the change will affect any future product plans for Chrysler, a brand that currently offers just one model -- the Pacifica minivan --remains to be seen

[Images: Stellantis]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 30 comments
  • Oldsaltydog Oldsaltydog on Mar 09, 2026

    "Feuell was appointed CEO of Chrysler in September 2021, tasked with leading the historic brand's transition to a fully electric lineup by 2028."

    Well, that didn't go so well now did it! LOL!

    It never ceases to amaze me how far out of touch these executives are from the reality of the product they're supposed to be producing. Now that the electric transition has proven to be a complete flop, it's time for new leadership! In interviews she mentions how she's asked "all the time" if Chrysler is going away, well Chris, maybe you should ask yourself why that question keeps coming up? Not sad to see her go, but pretty sure Chrysler is DOA.

    • Luke42 Luke42 on Mar 10, 2026

      Correction: Chrysler’s EVs were a flop.

      That’s not the same thing as EVs as a whole being a flop.

      I’m an EV guy, and even I didn’t give the Dodge ChargerEV a second look — the nostalgia didn’t speak to me. The reviews of the Jeep EVs basically concluded they were half baked.


      Tesla, Rivian, Chevrolet/GM, Hyundai/Kia, and Ford are all way ahead of the Stellantis brands - so that’s where my attention is.






  • Oldsaltydog Oldsaltydog on Mar 10, 2026

    Stellantis in the USA consists of Jeep, Ram Trucks, Dodge, Chrysler, Maserati, & Alfa Romeo. Jeep limps on, as does Ram (since Americans buy trucks at a 3 to 1 ratio it's no surprise) Dodge might recover from the ridiculous electrification failure it tried, but that's not a sure thing. Chrysler for all intents and purposes is dead (has been for some time). Alfa and Maserati are nothing more than an after thought with no real invigorating new products and have always been low volume niche MFR's. This is why the sale of MOPAR to a foreign company was not a good idea, everyone knew what the result would be. We like to think we are very much like Europe, but in reality we are far far apart. The leadership of Stellantis has no clue how to function in the USA and it shows. Stellantis really just wanted the American infrastructure to pedal it's own products but found out Americans don't like their cars, oops!

  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next