Question of the Day: Should Autonomous Vehicles be Required to Have Driving Controls?

Michael Strong
by Michael Strong

When the first autonomous vehicles moved from the drawing boards to the test tracks, they were envisioned as not having steering wheels, gas pedals, etc. When Google, later Waymo, rolled out its early concept cars, the little eggs on wheels came sans controls.


The company pitched a future where senior citizens or physically challenged people could simply get into their self-driving vehicles can get into their personal vehicle, tell it where they needed to go and it would drive them there — and back.

However, as time has gone on, more and more critics have asked an important question: What happens is the car runs amok? How will it stop? Shouldn’t the passengers be able take control of the car? 

Now Amazon’s robotaxi business, Zoox, just became the first company to win approval from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to deploy its steering wheel-free robotaxis to charge for rides — on a limited basis. NHTSA Administrator Jonathan  Morrison told  Reuters  that Zoox had received clearance to commercially deploy up to 2,500 ​vehicles in each of the next two years.


So we ask today: Do you think driving controls should remain mandatory equipment for autonomous cabs or not — and why? 

[Images: Zoox]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.


Michael Strong
Michael Strong

Michael Strong has spent more than 25 years writing about the automotive industry. A Detroit-area native, he’s written about everything from local car shows to product reviews to financial news. Currently he writes and edits for a variety of national and local publications. He’s also a longtime member of the Automotive Press Association and the International Motor Press Association, and a graduate of Georgia Southern University. Hail Southern! Despite a love for ’70s land yachts and BMWs from the late ’80s and early ’90s, his personal vehicle is neither of those.

More by Michael Strong

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Aug 05, 2026

    What's the point? By the time a rider realizes the car's in trouble, it's going to be too late, even if there are controls in the vehicle.

  • MGS1995 MGS1995 on Aug 06, 2026

    At the very least, they should take a page from the industrial robots and AGVs and provide a teach pendant to allow a technician to manually guide the vehicle out of harm's way.

  • KwikShiftPro4X On Kijiji this would be $3000 as-is, where-is. Vintage! Rare! I knows whats I got!
  • SCE to AUX KBB says that the ATP of new vehicles was $50,526 in September. As a group, buyers afforded that much, but we know that some (up to 6%) will default. Deducting 6% from that ATP, we get $47,494.So anything lower than that is 'more affordable', and anything higher than that is 'less affordable'.
  • Tom170698702 It's time to stop recycling old articles. This one is almost 3 months old.
  • Oberkanone Dacia makes product line of affordable vehicles. An entire product line. One vehicle is not the answer for all needs. Dacia does affordable well.
  • YaMoBeThere This is an egregiously bad AI generated article, the middle of the article is repeated twice... but yea go ahead and nitpick about my comment pointing that out
Next