Nissan Joins ChargeScape

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Last month, a tripartite of major brands announce the launch of ChargeScape, an endeavor intended to better integrate the charging demands of electric vehicles to the nation’s power grid. Now, Nissan has joined the fray.


BMW, Ford, and Honda – and now Nissan – are all part of this ChargeScape joint venture, which is described as a software platform which integrates electron-hungry EVs into the power grid, shoring up its stability while allegedly saving drivers a few bucks on their charging. The software is designed to wirelessly connect with EVs and manage the flow of electricity in consideration of real-time grid conditions. They claim EV drivers have the potential to be rewarded financially for this flexibility yet promise vehicles will always be charged to desired levels by whatever time is specified by the user. 

Participating utilities say this idea will temporarily reduce demand when the grid is strained through smart charging even potentially even send energy back into the network when needed. One presumes a vehicle and/or charging facilities capable of bidirectional charging is required to perform such a feat. Nissan is said to be investing heavily in this, while vehicles like the Ford F-150 Lightning are already packing this feature. Remember, we’re talking about bidirectional flow through the main charging port, not the commonly found household-style power outlets which pepper most EVs and can, in the case of a Lightning, provide just as much juice as a robust consumer-grade generator during a power outage.

Described as a tech company with offices in New York, the crew at ChargeScape list the automakers as ‘investors’, though it is noted Nissan takes a 25 percent stake in the joint venture by joining the fray. Using the ChargeScape backend software is a way for OEMs to roll out these types of charging features without needing to plow development dollars into an idea someone else has already sussed.


[Image: ChargeScape/Nissan/Ford]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Jalop1991 Jalop1991 on Oct 08, 2024
    oh look, another "platform". Wait--Nissan? Oh, so this is the next CHAdeMO.
  • Scott Scott on Oct 08, 2024
    Will Nissan even be around in a few more years? They do not seem to be on a good long term path right now. I will leave the truly snarky comments to others.
  • Lorenzo If it's over 30 years old and over 80k miles, and not a classic, it's a parts car, worth no more than 20% of original price.
  • Dusterdude No mileage noted on a 33 year old car means likely well north of 300k + miles , along with issues noted , should equate to an ask price of less than $3k
  • Ajla IMO, something like this really should be naturally-aspirated.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Unless they are solid state batteries you BAN THEM. I like EVs... but EVs like to burn ... for days
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh uh .. it looks like a VW golf got the mumps
Next