Drive Notes: 2024 Chevrolet Traverse RS AWD

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

I had a brief time with the 2024 Chevrolet Traverse RS AWD recently.


Chevrolet's large-but-not-largest three-row family SUV is redesigned, getting truckier looks, a new engine, and a screen-centric interior.

Normally I'd give a redesign the full review treatment, but I just didn't get a ton of mile on this one because I had to head out of town on some personal business -- that happens sometimes. Still, I got enough seat time to get a sense of this one's strengths and weaknesses.

Underhood is a 2.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that makes 328 horsepower and 326 lb-ft of torque. It mates to an eight-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel drive is available -- my test unit was so equipped.

Four trims are available -- LS, LT, Z71, and RS, which is the version I drove. The "sporty" RS (can anything in this class be sporty?) gets special badging, 22-inch black aluminum wheels, a suspension tuned for sportier handling, trim-specific interior and exterior accents, a flat-bottom steering wheel, and one-touch power-fold second-row seats.

Other standard features included a remote start, adaptive cruise control, Bose audio, satellite radio, SuperCruise, six USB ports, built-in Google compatibility, Wi-Fi hot spot, power liftgate, 17.7-inch LCD screen, active noise cancellation, power-folding third-row seats, heated and cooled front seats, heated second-row outboard seats, heated steering wheel, power tilt/telescope steering wheel, ambient interior lighting, power panoramic sunroof, wireless device charging, LED lighting, HD surround vision, parking assistance, forward collision alert, automatic emergency braking, and intersection automatic emergency braking. The only option was $495 Radiant Red paint. So the base price was $56,200 with an as-tested mark of $57,990 after D and D and a $100 credit.

Let's get on with the pros and cons.

Pros

  • This was one smooth-riding beast. Whether it was highway, suburban surface roads, or neighborhood streets, the ride was pleasant, though some occasional float and wallow snuck in.
  • Smooth also applies to this powertrain -- I'd have never guessed it only had four cylinders. It felt torquey, too.
  • The inside is comfy and so spacious that I question why anyone needs to go up in size to the Tahoe or Suburban.
  • I found the large screens easy to read. Easy to use, however, is another matter.
  • The cabin was nice and quiet.
  • Not only that, but the interior was thoughtfully set up.
  • I didn't get the chance to use SuperCruise this go-round, but it's nice to see it available here.

Cons

  • While the engine felt torquey, the Traverse felt a bit pokey due to weight. Americans appetites demand size, which means more weight -- I get that. But press down on the throttle and you can feel the heaviness.
  • A lot of the infotainment menus were easy to use, but I struggled with the gauges. It looked like you could flip between tiles of info, but I could never figure out how to do it.
  • The column shifter was a pain when trying to shift from park to reverse to drive in short order while leaving a parking lot.
  • Handling merely exists.
  • While I dig the "trucky" looks, I sorta miss the rounded-edge design of the older Traverses. This one looks a bit like a baby Tahoe, for better or worse.
  • Fuel economy won't be wallet friendly at 19/24/21.

The redesigned 2024 Chevrolet Traverse is quite easy to live with, but weight is an enemy here. On the other hand, the interior is roomy enough that you probably don't need to up-size even if you are often using the third row.

Despite an infusion of trucky machismo, the Traverse remains what it always has been -- a generally pleasant but slightly flawed people mover.

[Images: Chevrolet]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 26 comments
  • Redapple2 Redapple2 7 days ago
    Question. -gm- seems to jam drivers way to the outboard edge of the car where you are close to the B pillar. Barely an inch gap in the equinox and sierra. This new traverse too? Not acceptable. Rubbish cars.
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey 7 days ago
    I probably missed this skimming over the review, but what platform is the 'new' Traverse (and its stable mates) built on? How is a column shifter 'difficult to use'? Please explain. Just how old is Tim and has he never driven a vehicle with a column shifter before? Surely it is easier to use and more tactile than a 'dial' or even push button shifters? Finally would this vehicle not be better if GM had decided to continue manufacturing and equipped this with its classic 3800 engine? Surely the mileage wouldn't be any/much worse?
    • See 3 previous
    • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey 6 days ago
      @28 and @Maintenance; thanks for your replies. I am old enough to remember when a 'Mighty Mouse' engine was the recommended solution to most engine related performance questions.
  • Crtfour The rear ends on these electric IQs are hideous. No thanks. Now, time to get back to the Eldorado: Distinctly Luxurious article.
  • ToolGuy Doesn't matter, EVs don't work, even if they do I mean did they won't I mean wouldn't have the range to drive to the track. Plus the world is running out of electricity (and there is no way to make more). The panel gaps on EVs are aerodynamically problematic, especially Porsche. No one can afford EVs. There is no place (literally -no- place) to charge, and even if you do I mean could it will I mean would crash the U.S. electrical grid and there is no way to restart it, ever. Drivers will grow old and die waiting for the vehicle to charge. EV racing will never benefit the environment the way that ICE racing does and has and will. The batteries cost more than the vehicle and that cost goes up every minute. All electricity is dirty and nasty and not wholesome like petroleum. EVs are slow (as in the opposite of quick) and the point of a drag race is quick. I can't hear well because of ICE and what happens when a silent EV runs over me at the track? It is a good thing that the EV thing ended when it did and will never return. I for one am relieved.
  • MaintenanceCosts It at least looks more like a Cadillac and less like a Traverse than the XT6. I'm a shopper in this segment and would give it a test drive, which I wouldn't bother with for the XT6.
  • 1995 SC Early El Camino = coolLate El Camino = coolThis one = not cool
  • AZFelix A calendar search shows Saturday May 14th could have recently been in 2005, 2011, 2016, and 2022. The phone number now shows for Coys Wheel in Kaysville, UT.
Next