GM Future Tech May Warn Drivers of Accidents Before They Happen

Michael Strong
by Michael Strong

A team at General Motors patented a technology designed to let drivers know of accidents before they happen — or at least before the driver can see the potential collision — using reflective head-up displays.


GM and every other major automaker currently uses a collection of sensors, radar, cameras, lidar, and other technology to warn drivers of potentially imminent crashes. They’re better known as blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and other technologies. 

Now, the company’s development team, specifically Kai-Han Chang, Joseph F. Szczerba, Thomas A. Seder, and Guy N. Kennerly, according to U.S. Patent Application Publication  US 2026/0014932 A1, has created a “system and method of non-line-of-sight imminent crash warning using reflective head-up displays.” The technology is still in development and there is no timetable or commitment to it becoming publicly available.

The system uses sensors to detect objects moving toward a vehicle, but not able to be seen by the driver, and uses the data collected to determine if the trajectory of object and the driver’s vehicle will cross. If so, it uses the vehicle’s head-up display to warn the driver of the possibility of a looming collision, according to the patent publication.

The patent application was filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on July 10, 2024, while the patent publication was published Jan. 15, 2026, noted the  GM Authority, a publication reporting about GM only.

According to the patent publication, the system relies on the same hardware currently built into many vehicles already produced. The warning could be relayed in a variety of formats, ranging from using the current format of head-up displays which range from about 3 inches by 5 inches to nearly twice that size, shown only to the driver, to much larger displays that could be seen by other passengers in the vehicle.

The system’s potential is maximized in places where the driver may have a difficult time seeing a lot of their environment, such as an intersection or around the curve. These are the situations where it’s most difficult for a driver to avoid a collision, which could give them an extra second or two of warning, and avoid a crash.

[Images: U.S. Patent Trade Office]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Michael Strong
Michael Strong

Michael Strong has spent more than 25 years writing about the automotive industry. A Detroit-area native, he’s written about everything from local car shows to product reviews to financial news. Currently he writes and edits for a variety of national and local publications. He’s also a longtime member of the Automotive Press Association and the International Motor Press Association, and a graduate of Georgia Southern University. Hail Southern! Despite a love for ’70s land yachts and BMWs from the late ’80s and early ’90s, his personal vehicle is neither of those.

More by Michael Strong

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Slavuta Slavuta on Feb 03, 2026

    Now I remember that interview.. it was some GM manager talking. He said something along this - soon, if you want to drive yourself, there will be designated areas for that. Otherwise you will be driven by an automated vehicle.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Feb 03, 2026

    It predicts elections?

  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
  • Master Baiter This is what happens when you take a chance on a startup auto company. Designing and building cars is hard.
Next