EPA Doing Away With Diesel Exhaust Fluid Power Restrictions By 2027
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin has announced plans to eliminate restrictions placed on diesel-equipped vehicles when they run out of diesel exhaust fluid (DEF).
Starting with model year 2027, the EPA wants manufacturers to do away with power limitations imposed whenever diesel trucks start running out of DEF. It likewise plans on working with automakers to create software changes that can be made to existing vehicles that would undo emissions-based restrictions pertaining to diesel exhaust fluid levels.
While the EPA has stated that it’s still committed to environmentalism, it’s also concerned that these restrictions have reduced productivity on America’s work vehicles and made an entire class of vehicles less desirable. Even though future vehicles will still be able to utilize DEF to boost emissions and fuel economy, it will not be required in order to keep diesel engines running via artificial, software-based restrictions.
EPA Administrator Zeldin made the announcement alongside U.S. Small Business Administrator Kelly Loeffler at the Iowa State Fair and it looks to be getting quite a bit of support from farmers and the trucking industry.
“No farmer should ever have their tractor literally brought to a halt in the middle of a field because of a Green New Deal style regulation from Washington,” Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) said of the plan. “The previous arbitrary diesel exhaust fluid system guidelines severely hurt farmers, truckers, and small businesses that rely on diesel powered trucks. Not only will the new guidelines save family-run farms hundreds of millions every year, but it is also simply common sense.”
Diesel vehicles used to have a lot of good things going for them. Compared to their gasoline counterparts, they typically offered superior fuel economy and torque. Despite having specialized maintenance routines, diesel engines tend to need less work overall and be exceptionally long lived due their relatively simple mechanics. Untreated diesel fuel likewise has a longer shelf life than gasoline, making it the more convenient fuel to store.
However, federal requirements for diesel exhaust fluid have undermined much of the above benefits. While it does help improve fuel economy as it treats emissions, it’s something else you have to buy and add to your vehicle at regular intervals. It also has a relatively short shelf life, particularly if you’ve exposed it to warmer temperatures and stinks horribly because it’s made from water and urea (the same chemicals you make when you go to the bathroom).
Exceptionally cold weather can result in diesel exhaust fluid freezing inside of the vehicle, creating problems. Clogged DEF systems are not uncommon on vehicles operating in extreme climates or among those that aren’t driven enough to prevent urea crystals from forming. Obviously, the biggest issue here is that it’s one more component that can go wrong on a powertrain that’s supposed to be synonymous with above-average reliability.
The EPA seems keen to eliminate some of those problems by asking manufacturers to stop putting trucks into limp mode when DEF levels are low. While this obviously isn’t an issue on older diesel vehicles, modern trucks will typically issue a series of warnings before limiting engine output and speed to prevent it from producing excess emissions.
“We have heard loud and clear from small businesses across the United States that the current DEF system is unacceptable. It is unacceptable that farmers, truckers, construction workers, and many other small businesses continually experience failures of diesel-powered equipment when they need it most — costing millions of dollars in lost productivity,” stated EPA Administrator Zeldin. “Today, we are responding to those concerns by calling on manufacturers to take action to update their software and eliminate the unnecessary sudden loss of power and frustrating shutdowns that too many Americans have experienced.”
The planned changes will allow the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems that inject DEF into exhaust streams to reduce nitrous oxide (NOx) emissions to be more generous. While restrictions vary between vehicles, past setups had diesels issuing low-DEF warnings before gradually reducing power. This would eventually be followed by the full-on limp mode that restricted a vehicle to just 5 mph. While the mileage varies by class for the next step, the diesel model’s on-board computer may even eventually prevent it from starting or being placed into gear until it’s been serviced.
Initial warnings are often subtle. But the later indications are basically impossible to miss. This has led proponents of DEF to claim that there’s really no excuse for diesel owners to ignore refilling their diesel exhaust fluid reservoirs. But the problem is that the same thing happens with the system fails and many vehicles have fairly large DEF tanks.
An HD pickup may have a tank sized up to 10 gallons, whereas a commercial semi could be closer to 30 gallons. Considering that diesel exhaust fluid tends to come in 2.5-gallon jugs (unless you're hitting a well-equipped truck stop), they’re not ultra convenient to haul around or pour. As previously mentioned, they also pad the price of running formerly economical diesel powertrains.
“The Trump Administration is fighting for farmers and truckers, as evidenced by the EPA’s new DEF guidance which is a big win for the millions of small businesses who rely on diesel engines — and who have been crushed by years of costly Green New Scam regulations,” said SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler. “This change will save family farms an estimated $727 million per year and offers vital financial and operational certainty. I’m proud to work alongside EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin to reduce red tape for our nation’s producers and deliver real relief for hardworking Americans.”
[Images: Yingna Cai/Shutterstock; Tada Images/Shutterstock; Magsi/Shutterstock; The Image Party/Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
I wonder what the environmental impact is of the dozens of DEF jugs I've used, the replacement of my faulty DEF system and 2 replacement DPF filters are versus the impact if my truck didn't have all this nonsense?
Anyone looked at the impact of manufacturing and transporting DEF fluid?
102,000 miles on my 2021 Ram EcoDiesel, which uses DEF. Never had a problem. Once about every 10,000 miles it needs 2.5 gallons. When towing its 5 gallons per 10,000 miles. And DEF is easily filled at truck stop when towing camper. Its also available in bulk containers and small 2.5 gallon jugs. As for running out: You've got to be a MAGOT moron not to take notice of the several low DEF warnings. You've got to be a real IDIOTrump
Pros: No diesel stink. 30 mpg on highway when not towing and at 75 mph.
Con: DEF now costs $3.00 to $5.00 a gallon. Possible mechanical issues (that I've not had).