Opinion: Don't Take My Apple CarPlay Away -- Unless Your System Is Better
To paraphrase the late, great Charlton Heston, you can pry my Apple CarPlay from my cold, dead hands.
OK, fine, that's a bit extreme. But given GM's seeming desire to replace CarPlay with its own Google-based system, you can see why I, an iPhone owner, have some reservations. Especially if other automakers follow.
I want to preface this by saying that despite my ownership of several Apple products -- iPhone, TV, watch, iPad -- I am not an Apple fanboy. I don't get excited for the developer conference or read Apple-centric blogs. My first smartphone was a Droid. I work on a PC. I often go a very long time before upgrading to a newer iPhone model instead of trading in at each launch. Heck, even my Apple watch was a freebie tossed in with an upgrade.
Nor do I think CarPlay is perfect. Earlier iterations of the wired and wireless systems could be buggy. I also don't love that if you're parked in a drive-thru line and you scroll social media or play a game, the sounds of ads or the game takes over the audio.
And yeah, sometimes CarPlay requires too many presses of the touch-screen -- presses that distract from driving.
It's just that CarPlay -- and from what I've seen from the passenger seat, Android Auto -- generally seem to work better than most OEM infotainment systems. Navigation is often better via Google Maps, Apple Maps, or Waze than it is via OEM mapping. CarPlay often works much more easily for playing music or having a text message read to me.
Some OEM systems are pretty good, to be fair -- UConnect and Ford's latest, for example -- but the better ones seem to follow the basic user interface of CarPlay. Think movable tiles/apps, for one. One would think automakers might be able to blaze the trail instead of following.
Quite frankly, it's embarrassing for the industry that no automaker has, in the 20 years since Bluetooth launched and the 12-ish years since CarPlay came to market, built an infotainment system that is better than CarPlay or Android Auto.
See, here's the thing -- like most consumers, I will usually use the best product available if all else is equal, or if I can save money. I don't use CarPlay because I love Apple, I use it because it works better than the infotainment systems in just about every car I test. If automakers gave me a reason to use their systems (beyond the necessary testing those in my job must do) instead of clicking on the CarPlay icon, well, I'd use them.
But now GM will be taking away the choice -- at least eventually. Which is frustrating in and of itself. So GM's system had better be, well, better than CarPlay.
Really, I want two things from automakers -- the choice as to whether to use CarPlay or their system, and a reason to actually choose not to use CarPlay.
Give me that, and I will be a happy camper. Take away my CarPlay and replace it with something worse, something that I have no choice but to use, and your cars probably won't be on my shopping list.
[Images: General Motors]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
It doesn't really matter how good the auto maker's built-in system is, what I want is continuity with the media and apps I'm using on my other devices. For example, I can search in Google Maps on my laptop for a destination; take my phone in the car, connect CarPlay, and that recent destination from my laptop is available at the top of the list.
So many car manufacturers out there making cars that I have to choose from.
Why would I even shop at one that doesn't support CarPlay when I don't have to???
That said, if Apple people are raving that whatever they come up with integrates better (than CarPlay) with my phone, then I'd have to evaluate it. But seriously, I don't know how it could unless they work with Apple on it.