Junkyard Find: 1992 Daihatsu Charade SE Hatchback

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

While Daihatsu has long been one of the biggest sellers of small cars and trucks in its homeland, the brand was available in the United States for just the 1988 through 1992 model years. Two models were sold here: the Rocky mini-SUV and the Charade supermini. Today's Junkyard Find is one of the very last Daihatsus sold in the United States, discovered at a Denver boneyard earlier this year.


I'm always on the lookout for Daihatsus during my junkyard travels, but they have become extremely rare. It has been four years since I last spotted a discarded Rocky (and I still get desperate emails from Rocky owners asking me about it), and today's Charade is the first I've shot since 2022.

I've found that Japanese speakers don't get bent out of shape over the localized ways foreigners pronounce "Subaru" or "Mazda," but they tend to flinch when they hear us say "Die-hot-sue" with the long U at the end. I try to get it less wrong when I'm talking Copens or Canbuses with car freaks in Japan.

Toyota first bought a piece of Daihatsu in 1967, gradually upgrading its stake over the years. In 2016, Daihatsu became a wholly owned subsidiary of Toyota. Daihatsu has built plenty of small vehicles for Toyota over the decades, including the Toyota Tank. Toyota Tank!

The Charade was supposed to compete for American sales with the Suzuki Cultus family ( Chevrolet Sprint/ Geo Metro/ Suzuki Swift), Ford Festiva and Subaru Justy, but car shoppers couldn't help but notice that Daihatsu's mighty business partner offered a bigger car with recognizable manufacturer's badges for about the same price: the Tercel EZ.

In 1990, the cheapest possible Charade (the three-cylinder SE hatchback) had an MSRP of $6,497 (about $16,522 in 2025 dollars). The most affordable 1990 Ford Festiva was $6,319 ($16,069 now), the Cheapskate Edition Geo Metro cost $5,995 ($15,245 today) and the Subaru Justy started at a mere $5,866 ($14,917 after inflation).

Then there was the 1990 Yugo GV and its $4,435 price tag ($11,278) and the $5,899 base Hyundai Excel/ Mitsubishi Precis ($15,001). The Charade was supposed to beat all those cars on features and build quality… but what about that $6,488 ($16,499) Toyota Tercel EZ?

You'd think that the early-1990s recession would have encouraged car shoppers to take a longer look at cheap gas-sippers like the Charade, especially when it looked like the 1990 invasion of Iraq was going to push up gas prices. But fuel stayed cheap and SUVs beckoned.

The US-market Charade was available as a four-door sedan and three-door hatchback. I've never managed to find a junkyard Charade sedan, but I will keep looking.

While this car has the base SE trim level, it was purchased with some major options. First of all, it has the "big-block" 1.3-liter SOHC four-banger (80 horsepower/70 pound-feet) instead of the base single-liter three-cylinder (53 horsepower/58 pound-feet).

Then there's the three-speed automatic transmission, which wasn't even available on the Charade here for the first couple of years.

Air conditioning! Going by 1990 prices (the only trustworthy reference guides I have that include the Charade are 1989-1990 ones and online-available car prices from this era are all wrong), a new Charade SE hatchback with 1.3, automatic, air conditioning, power steering and tape stripes would have cost $8,420, or about $21,412 in today's money.

Then there's the AM/FM/cassette radio with auto-reverse and digital tuning, which listed at $375 ($654 after inflation). The passenger-side outside mirror was $88 ($224), and if this car was sold with alloy wheels they'd have been $395 ($1,004).

Let's call it about $23k in current prices, which is about what you'd pay for a new Sentra.

However, selling new Daihatsus in 1992 would have been like selling new Daewoos in 2002. The whole "doomed brand nobody's ever heard of boarding up the showroom windows" thing probably had soon-to-be-unemployed Daihatsu dealership employees desperate to move iron off the lot. We can assume that this car really was a good deal, for a buyer who didn't care about resale value.

This car traveled just a bit more than 90,000 miles during its decades on the road. I've documented a junked Charade with 224,607 miles and a junked Rocky with 202,762 miles, so maybe a bit of Toyota build quality rubbed off on these cars.

One of the most respected names in Japan for over 80 years.

Don't buy your new car from Auto Inc., Colossal Cars or Mega Motors!

JDM car commercials tend to be more fun than their US-market counterparts, but this one is on the painful side.

Here's a better one for the previous generation of Charade. Yes, there were Charade Turbos in Japan.

Here's a maddeningly perky Charade ad from Australia.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

1992 Daihatsu Charade in Denver wrecking yard.

If you'd like to watch a salaryman open a Daihatsu driver's door from four different camera angles, this JDM ad is for you.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Hagerty and The Truth About Cars.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • FormerFF FormerFF on Oct 07, 2025

    I hadn't heard of this.

  • Jeff Jeff on Oct 08, 2025

    They really were not a bad car, and a ton of Tercel parts will fit. I worked at a Toyota, BMW store and our sister location sold Daihatsu and Mitsubishi. We had all 4 lines in our parts department. And, the parts number system was nearly identical to Toyota. Few people know during those times Daihatsu assembled different cars for Toyota, including the Starlet, some AE86 Corollas even the van.

  • Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
  • Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
  • Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
  • Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
  • Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Next