Junkyard Find: 1988 Pontiac Fiero GT

by Murilee Martin

Published: May 19th, 2025

Which of The General's Should Have Been Game-Changers But Weren't vehicles most makes the ghost of Alfred P. Sloan want to rise up and haunt his bumbling successors? The Corvair? The Citation? The Vega? The Allanté? The Aztek? How about today's Junkyard Find, the final-year Pontiac Fiero?

Since both the Vega and the Citation were innovative machines that would have dominated their respective sales decades had their good engineering not been torpedoed by poor execution and/or intracorporate squabbling, they inflicted far more lasting harm to GM than a low-volume sports car ever could have dealt out. But still, the maddening story of the Fiero must enrage Sloan's ghost.

I can't improve on Aaron Severson's masterful Kill Your Darlings: The Birth and Death of the Pontiac Fiero, so go read that right now if you haven't already done so.

Long story short, the Fiero's initial design got bean-countered into an overweight econo-commuter with a parts-bin suspension and the gnashy pushrod Iron Duke as its base engine. That's what was sold for the 1984 through 1987 model years.

But for 1988, the Fiero finally got the suspension it was supposed to have had from the beginning (with some improvements added since that time). Hooray, no more Citation/Chevette underpinnings! Few cared by that time, though, and sales of the much-improved Fiero were miserable. The car got the axe, with the final '88 Fiero built in August of that year.

I photographed this car last summer in a high-turnover Northern California junkyard, so it has been crushed by now. However, I still find discarded '88 Fieros every year or two, so parts are still out there.

This is a top-of-the-line GT model, so it has the 2.8-liter pushrod V6 rated at 135 horsepower and 165 pound-feet.

A three-speed TH125 automatic transmission was available for $490 (about $1,359 in 2025 dollars), but this car has the base Muncie/Getrag five-speed manual.

The MSRP for this car was $13,999, or about $38,814 after inflation. The base 1988 Toyota MR2 cost $12,808 while the 145-horse supercharged version listed at $16,418 ($35,512 and $45,521 in today's money). Meanwhile, a new 1988 Honda CRX Si had a sticker price of just $10,195 ($28,267).

The optional air conditioning added $775 ($2,148) to this car's cost.

Unusually for GM cars of the era, Fieros got odometers that could show hundreds of thousands of miles. That's why we can see that this one traversed 163,087.7 miles during its driving career.

Its final owner applied a bit of aftermarket suspension hardware before the end.

The RPM wheel with a lock was the only one remaining on the car when I arrived.

The body is pretty rough.

Worth restoring? Probably not, but some of its parts lived on in other '88 Fieros.

1988 Pontiac Fiero GT in California wrecking yard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Junkyard #JunkyardFind #DownOnTheJunkyard #Pontiac #Fiero #PontiacFiero #1980s #SportsCar #Sportscars #California #twoseater #GMDeathWatch

Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Hagerty and The Truth About Cars.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 37 comments

Arthur Dailey on May 20, 2025

Another example of 'a camel being a horse designed by a committee'.

When the Fiero was first unleashed on the public GM executives were still coasting on the brand loyalty that existed for GM in North America.

They believed that even though their 2 seater could not compete with the likes of the 2 seaters being manufactured/sold by Japanese companies, that the masses would still buy their product because it was from GM. So why not use cheaper parts and lacklustre interiors?

1 Reply
- Lloyd Bonified on May 20, 2025
  
  Yeah that isn't true at all Arthur. First off, what Japanese 2 seaters are you refering to in 1983? Secondly Pontiac nerfed the car due to GM internal politics and the Highlander approach to 2 seat sports cars (There can be only one...the Corvette). But Pontiac was for whatever reason dead set on producing it so they pitched it as some sort of urban commuter and equipped it as such. Given the limited reach of 2 seat sports cars the Corvette people were probably correct. That's why you got the iron duke and Chevette based rear suspension though.
  
  2
- Stellantis Guy on May 21, 2025
  
  To be clear, camels are incredibly well-adapted animals.
  
  1
NJRide on May 20, 2025

Is this like the Probe where this was supposed to be the "future sporty/muscle car" but fan loyalty and falling fuel prices crushed it? The Probe was somewhat successful comparatively (though I feel the name sounds way worse than it did in the 1990s)
Also strange considering GM badge engineering everything to death that there wasn't a Chevy or Olds version.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars