Mitsubishi Tries Harder in 2021 J.D. Power Study

by Jason R. Sakurai

Published: March 11th, 2021

mitsubishi tries harder in 2021 j d power study

Mitsubishi Motors’ third-place ranking in the latest J.D. Power Customer Service Index (CSI) indicates the brand is trying harder to improve the experience for service done under warranty and or customer pay. Up one spot from 2020 among non-premium, mass-market nameplates, Mini ranked the highest with a score of 864, Buick ranked second at 859, followed by Mitsubishi at 857, GMC at 856, and Kia in fifth at 855.

Vehicles one- to three-years-old that required service in 2020 were a part of this survey. Stay-at-home orders and working from home caused owners to drive fewer miles, thus extending the service interval. J.D. Power reported that service visits were only down six-percent from the previous year, and satisfaction rose by ten points to 847 on a 1,000-point scale.

Customer satisfaction was measured at both franchised dealers and independent service facilities for maintenance or repairs. This provided a numerical index of the automotive brands in the U.S. that performed well, as measured by service quality, service facility, service initiation, service advisor, and vehicle pick-up.

Significant among the survey’s findings were that those who used contactless payments were more satisfied at vehicle pick-up, 44-points more so among premium customers, and 69-points for mass-market owners. While only six-percent of premium and one-percent of mass-market owners used this option, going forward dealers may decide to keep it if the trend grows after the virus has subsided.

While express service users were more satisfied by ten points, only 54-percent of battery electric vehicle (BEV) owners took their cars in for service, and when they did, BEV owners were 69 points lower in service satisfaction than the average, and 76 points lower in service quality. Power attributes this to the difficulty in servicing BEVs versus regular vehicles with internal combustion engines, and fewer visits that equated to fewer opportunities for dealers to make a good impression on these owners. On average, twice as much maintenance is being done on a service visit than repairs, while with BEVs, the ratio is nearly even. The complexity of BEVs is in part why BEV owners are 2.5 times less likely to have service completed correctly the first time.

The survey, conducted from July through December 2020, was based on 62,519 responses from owners and lessees of 2018-2020 model-year vehicles.

[Images: Mitsubishi Motors, J.D. Power]

#CustomerService #J.D.Power #Satisfaction #ServiceExperience #Survey

Jason R. Sakurai

With a father who owned a dealership, I literally grew up in the business. After college, I worked for GM, Nissan and Mazda, writing articles for automotive enthusiast magazines as a side gig. I discovered you could make a living selling ad space at Four Wheeler magazine, before I moved on to selling TV for the National Hot Rod Association. After that, I started Roadhouse, a marketing, advertising and PR firm dedicated to the automotive, outdoor/apparel, and entertainment industries. Through the years, I continued writing, shooting, and editing. It keep things interesting.

More by Jason R. Sakurai

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 8 comments

Akear on Mar 12, 2021

If they are willing to pay the ransom J.D. Powers allows automotive bottom feeders a chance to finish at the top of a survey. Of coarse these surveys are for the most part detached from reality. At this point does anyone take J.D powers seriously?

Like Reply
Art Vandelay on Mar 12, 2021

so many $#!+boxes

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars