General Motors Filed a Patent Application for a Navigation System That Knows When You Hate It
General Motors this month filed a patent application for a navigation system that can gauge how effective it is in frustrating guiding drivers based on their eye movements and how well those drivers follow directions.
The patent application filed Dec. 3 details a navigation system that watches “visual focus, the driver vocalizations and the driver emotions, along with vehicle system parameters from a data bus … to evaluate driver satisfaction with navigation guidance and determine driver behavior.”
“You missed our last turn, Aaron.”
I know, OnStar. We’re going off course.
“I don’t like how that sounds, Aaron.”
Take me to the nearest hole in the desert, OnStar.
According to the patent application, the system would use a driver-faced camera to track eye movement to see if the driver was paying attention to the road, looking elsewhere in the car or frantically searching for the nearest road sign.
Simultaneously, the system would use a forward-facing camera from the car to read nearby road signs to see if the driver’s eye movement picked up the last sign.
The systems would stitch together whether the driver was comfortable or hopelessly lost, and serve new directions appropriately.
The navigation system would also monitor the driver’s speech, perspiration and heart rate to determine just how pissed off you are now that you’re lost for the second time on the same stretch of road that it told you had construction, but clearly there’s no construction on this road.
Seriously, OnStar. You do this to me all the time!
Thankfully, the patent application also details a location-based “promotional offers for businesses near a destination or route of the driver,” to offer you a cookie at a nearby Arby’s to forget that it ever got you lost in the first place.
We reached out to General Motors for comment on the patent application but HAL can’t be bothered right now.
H/T to Bozi for the heads up.
More by Aaron Cole
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Amwhalbi My 1972 Mercury Capri was my first stick shift car. God, I miss that thing. It was a blast to drive.
- Vid169489471 The technology exists today to produce a variable color temperature (kelvin) LED lamp. It can vary from 2700k that soft orange look to 6500k the bright daylight with the bluish tint.Since everything in a late model car is computer controlled, it would be an easy task to write a few lines of code that enables your vehicle to not only dim down from hi to low beam but to shift color temp down to the 2700k range for oncoming traffic, then back up to 5000k once oncoming traffic has passed. For the operator it would be automatic and seamless. For older cars they could be retrofitted with LEDs that are 2700k on low beam and 5000k on hi beam. As far as standards, there could be a lumens max, and a minimum. Several States already have minimum lumen standards going back to the old incandescent bulbs. Why not update these to national standards.
- Jam169859557 More regulation is needed for ALL vehicle lighting systems. [list=1][*]The lighting that is most blinding are the rapidly flashing red, blue and amber lights on emergency vehicles. The lights themselves are blinding, flashing so rapidly that it's impossible for even the sharpest eyes to adjust. What's worse, is the nature of the emergency requires a careful view of the area surrounding the emergency vehicle. There is something going on that needs to be seen. More flashing lights is not the solution.[/*][*]Brighter headlights need to be regulated. The tall riding vehicles do not need headlights positioned so high that they blind drivers in lower riding vehicles. And those heasdlights need to be aimed properly. When I first started driving my 2020 Subaru Outback, many drivers would flash their lights, hoping I would dim my lights. This stopped after I performed am easy adjustment that tilted the beam lower. Late model Subaru headlamps are designed with a sharp cutoff that project less glare above the hood line. When the headlights are properly aimed, other drivers are not blinded by the beam.[/*][*]Customized light assemblies make it more difficult to see the marker lights (tail lamps, turn signals and side marker lamps) that have been tinted. There are many municiple codes that prohibit this tinting, but these laws are seldom enforced.[/*][/list=1]Solutions: Tight controls on emergency vehicle lighting. In trying to make these vehicles more visible, a dangerous side effect is reducing the ability of drivers to see the surrounding perils.Headlight design regulations that reduce the height of the headlight assemblies. Just because a pickup truck has a hood that sits 4 feet abouve the pavement, it does not mean the headlights need to be so high. Owneres should maintain proper adjustments to their vehicle headlights.Establish and enforce regulation requiring a illumination standard be followed.
- Stl170698708 as someone who hates big government, and their interference;but you can add me to the list of people that are blinded by the lights.unfortunately "the poop is out of the horse and no way is it going back in"They have had 5 years to make lights bigger, badder and brighter because in the vehicle work it is go big or go home!Trucks are the worst because so many people use them to express their dominance and that is big, big, big $$ both at the Original Purchase and in the Aftermarket world.If, we are so lucky to get some good government regulation on this it will also take some very good Court enforcement to get the aftermarket people with fines and lawsuits.Much like the EPA did with the Diesel Tuner Industry that felt emission regulations didn't apply to them.This is from someone that owns said pickup truck with the same bright headlights,but i only use the truck when I have too and always turn off the Fog lights when driving in traffic.
- Art65765977 I saw a porsche 911 with the most amazing headlights from behind approaching the Sunshine skyway in Florida. The pattern was 108 degrees across sweeping the road like a broom. My brother and I were amazed. I don't know what it looked like from the front but i am sure it was better than American cars
Comments
Join the conversation
Many posters here have argued at length about the numbing and dumbing of drivers by the inexorable march of auto tech, from automatic transmissions to ABS to ESC, but I maintain that the most serious abdication of drivers' accountability is the use of a nav system. How can you claim to be in control of the vehicle if you don't know where you're going, if you've surrendered the most basic aspect of travel to a disembodied voice that can't see what you can? I know that I'm an old fart that doesn't even own a smart phone, but come on, don't you know where you're trying to get to when you get in the car? And if you're going somewhere foreign, why wouldn't you look up the destination before you leave?
Monitors eye movements okay...... perspiration? and what algorithm will accurately put that one to use? Is it tied into the AC and internal vehicle temperature? Heart rate...from where and how? That black box data will be real fun to apply in court post crash. Considering GM's ignition switch engineering......... is there an off switch?